Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN

Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Perfusion MR Imaging in Primary and Metastatic Solitary Malignant Brain Tumors

Nail Bulakbasi, Murat Kocaoglu, Anar Farzaliyev, Cem Tayfun, Taner Ucoz and Ibrahim Somuncu
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2005, 26 (9) 2187-2199;
Nail Bulakbasi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Murat Kocaoglu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anar Farzaliyev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cem Tayfun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taner Ucoz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ibrahim Somuncu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    A 22-year-old man with low-grade oligoastocytoma (WHO II) in left frontoparietal lobe.

    A, Axial T2-weighted spin-echo image (2295/90) shows hyperintense mass involving left insula and temporal operculum.

    B, Tumor does not demonstrate contrast-enhancement on axial T1-weighted image (583/15), which suggests a LGGT.

    C, Gradient-echo axial perfusion MR image (627/30) with rCBV color overlay map shows a low rCBVT value of 1.50 and rCBVP value of 1.18, in keeping with LGGTs.

    D, Time-signal intensity and gamma-variate fitted curves from tumoral (red), peritumoral (blue), and normal (purple) areas show prominent decrease in signal intensity from tumoral area. Decreased signal intensity in peritumoral area is at least equal to that of normal gray matter.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    A 22-year-old man with centrally located glioblastoma multiforme (WHO IV).

    A, Tumor shows heterogeneous hyperintensity with prominent peritumoral edema and/or tumoral infiltration (arrow) on axial T2-weighted SE image (2295/90).

    B, There is a significant heterogeneous enhancement in tumoral borders but not in peritumoral area (arrow) on axial T1-weighted image (583/15).

    C, Gradient-echo axial perfusion MR image (627/30) with rCBV color overlay map shows both high rCBVT value of 6.58 and rCBVP value of 2.21, which are consistent with HGGT. Peritumoral increased rCBV (arrow) shows tumoral infiltration outside the tumoral margins, which is not perceptible on T2- and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images.

    D, Time-signal intensity and gamma-variate fitted curves from tumoral (red), peritumoral (blue), and normal (purple) areas show prominent decrease in signal intensity from tumoral and peritumoral areas, when compared with signal intensity of normal gray matter.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Scatter plots of the tumoral (A–C) and peritumoral (D–E) rCBV values of different tumor groups show that higher rCBV values are linearly related to higher degree malignancy. Lines are fitted by linear regression with 95% confidence interval. LGGT indicates low-grade glial tumor; HGGT, high-grade glial tumor; MET, metastasis; LGA, low-grade astrocytoma; LGMT, low-grade mixed tumor; HGA, high-grade astrocytoma; HGMT, high-grade mixed tumor; DAS, diffuse astrocytoma; PAS, pilocytic astrocytoma; AAS, anaplastic astrocytoma; GBM, glioblastoma multiforme.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Correlation plots of individual data points show linear correlation between tumoral and peritumoral rCBV values of different tumor groups. Lines are fitted by linear regression with 95% confidence interval.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    A 51-year-old man with cystic METs from lung carcinoma located in right temporal lobe.

    A, Axial T2-weighted spin-echo image (2295/90), shows hyperintense cystic mass with peritumoral edema and/or infiltration (arrows).

    B, Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (583/15) reveals an irregularly ringlike enhancing mass without any peritumoral contrast enhancement (arrows).

    C, Gradient-echo axial perfusion MR image (627/30) with rCBV color overlay map shows a high rCBVT value of 3.05 but low rCBVP value of 1.05, which is consistent with METs. No rCBV increase is present on peritumoral area (arrows).

    D, Time-signal intensity and gamma-variate fitted curves from tumoral (red), peritumoral (green), and normal (blue) areas show prominent decrease in signal intensity from tumoral area. Decreased signal intensity in peritumoral area is at least equal to or less than that of normal gray matter.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    A 20-year-old man with pilocytic astocytoma (WHO I) in the brain stem.

    A, Axial T2-weighted spin-echo image (2295/90), shows hyperintense mass involving brain stem without significant peritumoral edema.

    B, Tumor strongly enhances on postcontrast axial T1-weighted image (583/15), which suggests a HGGT.

    C, Gradient-echo axial perfusion MR image (627/30) with rCBV color overlay map shows no significant perfusion with a low rCBVT value of 1.14 and rCBVP value of 0.88, in keeping with a LGGT. Very low rCBVP value helps to differentiate it from low-grade astrocytomas (WHO II).

    D, Time-signal intensity and gamma-variate fitted curves from tumoral (red), peritumoral (blue), and normal (yellow) areas show prominent decrease in signal intensity from tumoral area. Decreased signal intensity in peritumoral area is similar to that of normal gray matter.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1:

    Descriptive statistics of different tumor groups

    Tumor Type*n (%)ParameterMean/SD/SE95% CI for MeanRange
    LGGT (I–II/IV)36/75 (48.00)rCBVT2.30/1.12/0.191.92–2.680.84–5.73
    rCBVP1.18/0.24/0.041.10–1.260.77–1.86
    LGAT (I–II/IV)24/75 (32.00)rCBVT1.75/0.38/0.081.59–1.910.84–2.52
    rCBVP1.15/0.23/0.051.05–1.250.77–1.86
    LGODG (II/IV)12/75 (16.00)rCBVT3.40/1.29/0.372.59–4.221.73–5.73
    rCBVP1.23/0.25/0.071.07–1.380.87–1.83
    HGGT (III–IV/IV)22/75 (29.33)rCBVT5.42/1.52/0.334.74–6.093.15–8.96
    rCBVP2.17/0.82/0.181.80–2.531.00–4.14
    HGAT (III–IV/IV)15/75 (20.00)rCBVT4.78/0.99/0.264.23–5.333.15–6.58
    rCBVP1.99/0.59/0.151.66–2.311.00–3.09
    HGODG (III/IV)7/75 (9.33)rCBVT6.78/1.63/0.625.27–8.294.55–8.96
    rCBVP2.55/1.15/0.431.49–3.611.23–4.14
    MET17/75 (22.67)rCBVT3.21/0.98/0.242.70–3.711.27–5.60
    rCBVP0.97/0.09/0.020.93–1.020.80–1.13
    • Note.—LGGT indicates low-grade glial tumor; LGAT, low-grade astrocytic tumor; LGODG, low-grade oligodendroglioma; HGGT, high-grade glial tumor; HGAT, high-grade astrocytic tumor; HGODG, high-grade oligodendroglioma; MET, metastasis; rCBVT, tumoral relative cerebral blood volume; rCBVP, peritumoral relative cerebral blood volume.

    • * Roman numerals in parentheses show tumor grade according to the World Health Organization 2000 classification scheme.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2:

    Descriptive statistics of low-grade astrocytomas

    Tumor Type*n (%)ParameterMean/SD/SE95% CI for MeanRange
    PAS (I/IV)10/75 (13.33)rCBVT1.71/0.45/0.141.39–2.030.84–2.52
    rCBVP0.97/0.14/0.050.87–1.070.77–1.29
    DAS (II/IV)14/75 (18.67)rCBVT1.78/0.35/0.091.58–1.981.29–2.43
    rCBVP1.28/0.19/0.051.17–1.391.07–1.86
    • Note.—PAS indicates pilocytic astrocytoma; DAS, diffuse astrocytoma; rCBVT, tumoral relative cerebral blood volume; rCBVP, peritumoral relative cerebral blood volume.

    • * Roman numerals in parentheses show tumor grade according to the World Health Organization 2000 classification scheme.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3:

    Descriptive statistics of high-grade astrocytomas

    Tumor Type*n (%)ParameterMean/SD/SE95% CI for MeanRange
    AAS (III/IV)4/75 (5.33)rCBVT4.09/0.06/0.033.99–4.194.04–4.18
    rCBVP1.92/0.43/0.221.23–2.611.28–2.19
    GBM (IV/IV)11/75 (14.67)rCBVT5.03/1.05/0.324.32–5.743.15–6.58
    rCBVP2.01/0.65/0.201.58–2.451.00–3.09
    • Note.—AAS indicates anaplastic astrocytoma; GBM, glioblastoma multiforme; rCBVT, tumoral relative cerebral blood volume; rCBVP, peritumoral relative cerebral blood volume.

    • * Roman numerals in parentheses show tumor grade according to the World Health Organization 2000 classification scheme.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4:

    Statistically significant lowest cutoff rCBVT values tested for different mean differences

    ParameterCutoff rCBVT Values
    For Grading*For Differentiation†
    3.9a2.6b4.3c2.3d3.9e2.3f3.9g3.9h2.2i2.3j3.9k3.9l2.3m2.2n2.5o
    ROC area0.9361.0000.9170.8040.9180.9290.9080.9410.9210.9350.9410.8960.8750.8670.875
    SE0.0370.0000.0680.0610.0530.0470.0600.0490.0650.0520.0520.0690.0720.0850.079
    AS0.0000.0000.0030.0000.0000.0000.0000.0010.0000.0000.0070.0000.0000.0040.001
    Sensitivity95.4610010094.1290.9194.1295.4610094.1294.1210090.9183.3383.3375.00
    Specificity91.6710083.3366.6788.2466.6788.2488.2490.0092.8688.2488.2491.6790.00100
    PPV87.5010077.7857.1490.9157.1491.3077.7894.1294.1266.6783.3383.3390.91100
    NPV97.0610010096.0088.2496.0093.7510090.0092.8610093.7591.6781.8282.35
    Accuracy93.1010089.4775.4789.7475.4792.3191.6792.5993.5590.4889.2988.8986.3688.46
    • Note.—rCBVT indicates tumoral relative cerebral blood volume; ROC, area under curve; SE, standard error; AS, asymptotic significance; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

    • * Superscripts indicate:

    • a Low- and high-grade glial tumors;

    • b low- and high-grade astrocytic gliomas;

    • c low- and high-grade non-astrocytic gliomas.

    • † Superscripts indicate:

    • d Low-grade glial tumors from metastases

    • e high-grade glial tumors from metastases;

    • f low-grade astrocytomas from metastases;

    • g high-grade astrocytomas from metastases;

    • h high-grade non-astrocytic gliomas from metastases;

    • i pilocytic astrocytomas from metastases;

    • j diffuse astrocytomas from metastases;

    • k anaplastic astrocytomas from metastases;

    • l glioblastoma multiforme from metastases;

    • m low-grade astrocytomas from low-grade oligodendrogliomas;

    • n pilocytic astrocytomas from low-grade oligodendrogliomas;

    • o diffuse astrocytomas from low-grade oligodendrogliomas.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5:

    Statistically significant lowest cutoff rCBVP values tested for different mean differences

    ParameterCutoff rCBVP Values
    For Grading*For Differentiation†
    1.9a1.5b1.1c1.2d1.1e1.2f1.1g1.2h1.1i1.1j
    ROC area0.8410.8790.7470.9550.7330.9330.9000.9090.9140.905
    SE0.0630.0670.0700.0370.0790.0530.0660.0710.0690.061
    AS0.0000.0000.0040.0000.0120.0000.0000.0000.0010.000
    Sensitivity68.1880.0061.1190.9158.3386.6791.6781.8292.8692.86
    Specificity10095.8388.2410088.2410088.2410090.0088.24
    PPV10092.3191.6710087.5010084.6210092.8686.67
    NPV83.7288.4651.7289.4760.0089.4793.7589.4890.0093.75
    Accuracy87.9389.7469.8194.8770.7393.7589.6692.8691.6790.32
    • Note.—rCBVP indicates peritumoral relative cerebral blood volume; ROC, area under curve; SE, standard error; AS, asymptotic significance; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

    • * Superscripts indicate:

    • a Low- and high-grade glial tumors;

    • b low- and high-grade astrocytic gliomas.

    • † Superscripts indicate:

    • c Low-grade glial tumors from metastases;

    • d high-grade glial tumors from metastases;

    • e low-grade astrocytomas from metastases;

    • f high-grade astrocytomas from metastases;

    • g low-grade non-astrocytic glial tumors from metastases;

    • h glioblastoma multiforme from metastases;

    • i diffuse astrocytomas from pilocytic astrocytomas;

    • j diffuse astrocytomas from metastases.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 9
1 Oct 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Perfusion MR Imaging in Primary and Metastatic Solitary Malignant Brain Tumors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Nail Bulakbasi, Murat Kocaoglu, Anar Farzaliyev, Cem Tayfun, Taner Ucoz, Ibrahim Somuncu
Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Perfusion MR Imaging in Primary and Metastatic Solitary Malignant Brain Tumors
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2005, 26 (9) 2187-2199;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Perfusion MR Imaging in Primary and Metastatic Solitary Malignant Brain Tumors
Nail Bulakbasi, Murat Kocaoglu, Anar Farzaliyev, Cem Tayfun, Taner Ucoz, Ibrahim Somuncu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2005, 26 (9) 2187-2199;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Histopathologic Findings
    • Grading
    • Differentiation
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Multisite Benchmark Study for Standardized Relative CBV in Untreated Brain Metastases Using the DSC-MRI Consensus Acquisition Protocol
  • Solitary Cerebral Metastases vs. High-grade Gliomas: Usefulness of Two MRI Signs in the Differential Diagnosis
  • Improved Brain Tumor Classification by Sodium MR Imaging: Prediction of IDH Mutation Status and Tumor Progression
  • MRI Grading versus Histology: Predicting Survival of World Health Organization Grade II-IV Astrocytomas
  • The Added Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Cerebral Blood Volume in the Preoperative Grading of Diffuse Gliomas
  • Imaging biomarkers of angiogenesis and the microvascular environment in cerebral tumours
  • Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI in patients with non-enhancing supratentorial brain gliomas: a valuable tool to predict tumour grading?
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire