Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Highly Diffusion-Sensitized Tensor Imaging of Unilateral Cerebral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Atsushi Shiraishi, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Shunichi Okada, Kazumi Kimura, Tohru Sawada, Hidehiro Mizusawa and Kazuo Minematsu
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2005, 26 (6) 1498-1504;
Atsushi Shiraishi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasuhiro Hasegawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shunichi Okada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazumi Kimura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tohru Sawada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hidehiro Mizusawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuo Minematsu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Selective neuronal death is a well-recognized histopathologic sequel to moderate ischemic brain damage. However, radiologic visualization of these changes has not been established, even with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). We sought to determine whether DTI with b values ≥1900 s/mm2 reveals occult diffusion abnormalities in patients with cerebral arterial occlusive disease.

METHODS: Six patients (five men, one woman; mean age ± standard deviation, 66 ± 8 years) with unilateral internal carotid or middle cerebral arterial occlusive disease but not parenchymal T2 hyperintensity underwent 3T fast DTI with b ≤ 1300 s/mm2 and slow DTI with b ≥ 1900 s/mm2. We postprocessed mean diffusibility and fractional anisotropy (FA) images from the fast and slow DTI datasets. Standardized asymmetry indices (AIs) were used to identify regional asymmetries. Diagnostic accuracy among the DTI modalities was assessed by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS: In hemispheres ipsilateral to occluded vessel, AIs were significantly elevated on fast mean-diffusibility images of white matter at the levels of the internal capsule (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00, 1.09; P = .045) and corona radiata (95% CI: 1.01, 1.12; P = .034). AIs were significantly decreased on slow FA images at the internal capsule (95% CI: 0.84, 0.98; P = .018) and white matter at the internal capsule level (95% CI: 0.92, 1.00, P = .043). The slow FA map had the highest accuracy (89.8%) for detecting the hemisphere ipsilateral to arterial occlusion.

CONCLUSION: Slow FA maps acquired by using DTI with high b values are useful for visualizing ischemic brain damage in apparently normal WM.

Selective neuronal death is well recognized as a histopathologic sequel of ischemic brain damage less severe than infarction (1–5). Selective neuronal death reveals regional loss of limited number of neurons without coagulation necrosis or cavitation of the neural tissue. Several histopathologic studies have demonstrated selective neuronal death in experimental animals (1–4) and human autopsy cases (5) with ischemic insults.

By using conventional MR imaging, brain infarction was widely accepted as depression of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with acute brain ischemia and T2 hyperintensities; however, radiologic visualization of selective neuronal death remains limited. Only studies of in vivo benzodiazepine receptor mapping (6, 7) or magnetization transfer imaging (8) in patients with acute (6) or chronic nonfatal ischemia (7, 8) have supported this concept for selective neuronal death.

Progress in diffusion MR imaging has advanced the immediate diagnosis of hyperacute ischemic stroke. Furthermore, applications of diffusion MR imaging continue to expand from the estimation of diffusion amplitudes, which enables the diagnosis of stroke on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), to the estimation of complete diffusion tensor, which may improved resolution of white matter (WM) microstructures in both healthy and diseased conditions on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). DTI depicts tissue diffusion characteristics as 3D ellipsoids (9). Postprocessed from these ellipsoids, DTI maps can reveal both amplitudes and anisotropy indexes of tissue diffusion properties on a voxel-by-voxel basis.

DTI with conventional b values of ≤1000 s/mm2 is already accepted as a tool with sufficient sensitivity to depict brain pathologies hidden in normal-appearing WM (10–20). However, in the evaluation of chronic brain ischemia, the sensitivity of DTI is limited because it shows only diffusion abnormalities that coexist with diffuse T2 hyperintensity (12, 18, 21) or secondary neuronal degeneration after stroke (15).

We hypothesized that increased diffusion weighting can reveal the slow-diffusing water component of neural tissue (22–24), which might clarify the subtle WM structural changes that accompanies selective neuronal death. We therefore used DTI with low and high b values to evaluate patients with cerebral arterial occlusive disease and minimal T2 changes.

Methods

Patients

The study was approved by the institutional review boards of our institution. To assess the subtle structural changes in the WM independent of apparent lesions, we included only patients with occlusive lesions (≥75% stenosis) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA). Patients with neurologic deficits were excluded, as were those with any other brain disease, and patients whose most recent neurologic episode occurred <3 months before the study.

We excluded patients with the following findings on fluid-attenuating inversion recovery images (1.5 T, fast spin-echo, TR/TE/TI = 10,000/100/2500, echo train length = 8): apparent symptomatic brain lesions, grade 2 or 3 hyperintensities in the deep WM or periventricular hyperintensities according to the Fazekas scale (25), asymptomatic cortical lesions, or lacunae larger than 3 mm in diameter.

Because of concerns about the safety of high-field-strength MR imaging, patients with implanted metals or medical devices, tattoos, or claustrophobia were excluded. Six patients hospitalized at National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan, between November 2001 and November 2003 met the study criteria (Table 1). These patients underwent imaging after informed consent was obtained. We also examined six nonage-matched healthy volunteers (three men, three women; mean age ± standard deviation, 29 ± 4 years) after obtaining informed consent and verifying the absence of safety concerns related to MR imaging.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1:

Patient demographics

Physiologic Basis of DTI with High b Values

The strength of diffusion weighting is quantified by the b value (26). For typical b values of ≤1000 s/mm2, diffusional signal-intensity decays can be simply approximated by using the single exponential model (27, 28). However, diffusion MR imaging studies with increased b values have revealed that this model is no longer best for describing diffusional signal-intensity decay in the human brain. The decay (Sb/S0) is better described by the double exponential model, as follows (22–24): Sb/S0 = Ffast exp(−Dfast × b) + Fslow exp(−Dslow × b), where Sb is the signal intensity with diffusion weighting of the specified b value, S0 is the signal intensity without diffusion weighting, Ffast and Fslow are the volume fractions of the respective fast and slow components, and Dfast and Dslow are the ADCs of the respective fast and slow components.

Fast components consist of loosely diffusion-restricted water components, which, with differences in D, show increased decay with b-value increments. Similarly, slow components are tightly diffusion-restricted water components and, as D changes, show decreased decay with change in the b value. Diffusion MR imaging with low b values represents both the fast and slow components; in contrast, imaging with high b values dominantly represents the slow diffusion components in eliminating signals from the fast components. To optimize the appropriate use of high b values for the slow components, we examined the diffusional signal-intensity decay of six healthy volunteers before beginning the study (Fig 1); these data indicated that we should use b values of ≥1900 s/mm2 to estimate the slow components.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Double-exponential diffusional signal-intensity decays. Plot shows 1) the mean ± 1 SD (error bars) of Sb/S0 at b = 100–3300 s/mm2 in the centrum semiovale in six healthy volunteers and 2) the approximation to the double-exponential model according to the nonlinear least-squares Marquardt–Levenberg algorithm (line) plotted on a logarithmic scale. Also shown are b-value ranges for fast (A) and slow (B) DTI in patients 3–6.

DTI Parameters

Spin-echo echo-planar imaging that was diffusion-sensitized with six non-colinear motion-probing gradients (9) was implemented on 3.0-T MR imaging systems equipped with gradients of ≤40 mTm−1 (Signa Horizon 3.0LX; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). We performed the following sequences same section orientation: spin-echo echo-planar T2-weighted imaging, fast DTI with a subset of low b values (100, 700, and 1300 s/mm2 for patients 1 and 2 and 100, 400, 700, and 1000 s/mm2 for patients 3–6 and control subjects), and slow DTI with a subset of high b values (1900, 2500, and 3100 s/mm2 for patients 1 and 2 and 1900, 2200, 2500, and 2800 s/mm2 for patients 3–6 and control subjects).

To achieve similar signal intensity-to-noise ratios, we averaged two images for fast DTI and eight images for slow DTI. Total examination times were 41 minutes for patients 1 and 2 and 56 minutes for patients 3–6 and control subjects. Other parameters consisted were a TR/TE of 11500/93.3 ms, a FOV of 220 mm × 220 mm, a matrix of 256 × 256, 16 near-axial sections with 7-mm thickness for patients 1 and 2 or 18 sections with 6-mm thickness for patients 3–6 and control subjects, 100 phase encoding steps, and 256 frequency-encoding steps.

Postprocessing

DTI datasets were automatically corrected for imaging distortions and coregistered in reference to echo-planar T2-weighted image by using software (Statistical Parametric Mapping 2; Functional Imaging Laboratory, Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK). These were postprocessed by using image-analysis software (MRVison 1.6.5; MRVision Co., Winchester, MA). Fast and slow tensors were constituted from the respective ADC datasets. Mean diffusibility (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) DTI maps (27, 28) were estimated from the fast (for fast MD and FA) and slow (for slow MD and FA) tensor datasets.

Region-of-Interest Analysis

One author (A.S.) semiautomatically defined the polygonal regions of interest (ROIs) to dissect the target WM by using the region-growing method (automatic function) with local thresholding (manual function) on image-analysis software (Osiris 4.1.8; Unite d’Imagerie Numerique, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland). ROIs for the internal capsule and those for all of the unilateral WM at sections including the internal capsule (WM-IC), corona radiata (WM-CR), and centrum semiovale (WM-CS) were dissected in reference to fast FA and slow MD images. Each ROI value was quantified simultaneously on all DTIs.

Statistical Analysis

Absolute ROI values of the hemisphere ipsilateral to the arterial occlusion (affected hemisphere) were compared with those of the contralateral (unaffected) hemisphere by using paired t tests (Table 2). An asymmetry index (AI) was used for the numerical evaluation of relative changes in ROIs in the affected hemisphere. The AI was calculated by obtaining the ipsilateral-to-contralateral ratio of values in ROI symmetrically placed on axial images. Diffusion characteristics in the normal brain are somewhat asymmetrical (29). Therefore, when the affected hemisphere was on the left, the AI was standardized by being divided by the mean value of the left-to-right ratios of similar ROIs obtained from control subjects. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the standardized AIs were calculated and statistically analyzed (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2:

ROI statistics

We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the different DTI modalities in depicting the affected hemisphere by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (Fig 2). A true-positive finding was defined when the individual AI for the affected hemisphere exceeded the threshold for MD or when it was less than the threshold for FA. False-positive findings were similar results in the unaffected hemisphere.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

ROC curves for fast MD (green), slow MD (black), fast FA (red), and slow FA (blue) indicate estimated accuracies of 78.1%, 69.3%, 77.4%, and 89.8%, respectively. Accuracy of predicting the affected hemisphere was superior for MD on fast DTI and for FA on slow DTI.

Results

Comparison of absolute ROI values demonstrated significant declines in slow FA at the internal capsule of the affected hemisphere (0.74 ± 0.10 vs 0.67 ± 0.08, P = .045). We found no significant differences in other ROI values on the slow FA map or in any ROI value on the fast MD, slow MD, or fast FA maps (Table 2). Standardized AIs of the slow FA map showed significant decreases in the internal capsule (95% CI: 0.84, 0.98; P = .018) and WM-IC (95% CI: 0.92,1.00; P = .043). Standardized AIs on the fast MD maps also showed slight but significant elevations in the WM-IC (95% CI: 1.00, 1.09; P = .045) and WM-CR (95% CI: 1.01, 1.12; P = .034). ROC analysis showed that the accuracy of detecting the affected hemisphere was 78.1% for fast MD, 69.3% for slow MD, 77.4% for fast FA, and 89.8% for slow FA (Fig 2). Figure 3 shows three sections from the DTI maps in patient 3, who had occlusion of the right internal capsule, and Figure 4 shows sections in patient 4, who had severe stenosis of the left MCA.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

DTIs of patient 3 with right ICA occlusion: fast MD (3A), slow MD (3B), fast FA (3C), slow FA (3D), and color-scaled slow FA maps (3E) of MD (10−3 s/mm2) and FA. Arrows indicate affected hemispheres. In the absence of apparent T2 hyperintensities, the slow FA map of patient 3 demonstrated slight anisotropy declines at right internal capsule.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

DTIs of patient 4 with left MCA stenosis: fast MD (4A), slow MD (4B), fast FA (4C), slow FA (4D). Slow FA map shows broad anisotropy declines in the left hemisphere at all levels shown.

Discussion

Tissue diffusion properties can be assessed by means of two postprocessed indices: MD (or ADC) and FA (27, 28). MD represents the magnitude of the diffusion tensor (27, 28), whereas FA represents the shape of the diffusion tensor (28), where an FA of 0 indicates a globular tensor and an FA of 1 indicates a linear tensor. Elevated FA values are probably related to tight diffusion barriers orthogonal to directions of the neural fibers, such as increased attenuation, decreased diameter, and tighter myelination, among others. Declines in FA may indicate neuronal loss, gliosis, and demyelination found in association with various neurologic disorders in normal-appearing WM (10, 11, 13–19).

The proved sensitivity of DTI with conventional b values for the evaluation of various brain pathologies (10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20) cannot simply be applied to brain ischemia. Previous DTI studies (b ≤ 1000 s/mm2) of obstructive cerebrovascular disease (12, 15, 18, 21) have demonstrated MD elevation and anisotropy decline in areas with T2 hyperintensity (12, 15, 18, 21), MD elevation in the normal-appearing WM adjacent to T2 hyperintensity (12, 18), and MD elevation and FA declines in the pyramidal tracts with ipsilateral hemiplegia (15).

Increased diffusion weighting may improve this insensitivity. Clark et al advocated a theoretical framework for the assignment of fast and slow components to extracellular and intracellular fluid (30). Yoshiura et al demonstrated the usefulness of DWI with high b values for the detection of WM degeneration associated with Alzheimer disease (31). In light of these findings, DTI with a high b value might directly reveal the cellular structure, primarily with the slow component, and thereby enable resolution of subtle ischemic changes associated with unilateral cerebral arterial occlusive disease.

We observed changes in the diffusion characteristics of affected hemispheres with minimal abnormalities on fluid-attenuating inversion recovery images. These changes were characterized as elevations in fast rather than slow MD and declines in slow rather than fast FA. ROC analysis indicated that the slow FA map had the best diagnostic accuracy in the affected hemisphere. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to demonstrate changes in properties of the slow component during disease conditions.

Regarding the equation for the double exponential model—Sb/S0 = Ffast exp(−Dfast × b) + Fslow exp(−Dslow × b)—the overall diffusion components represented in the first and second term on the right reflect the fast MD and FA, and the second term represented slow MD and FA that predominantly reflects the slow diffusion component. A possible interpretation of the elevation in fast MD without changes in slow MD is water displacement from the slow to fast component. The changes in MD imply increased loss of the cellular component and its displacement to extracellular fluid, in light of the framework for assignment of fast and slow tensors to extracellular and intracellular fluid (30).

Fast FA can be regarded as a marker of anisotropy for overall diffusion components, including the isotropic and loosely diffusion-restricted extracellular fluid components. In contrast, slow FA is theoretically a marker of anisotropy that predominantly represents the more tightly diffusion-restricted water component. In our study, the slow FA decline independent of changes in fast FA might explain the decreases in the highly anisotropic and tightly diffusion-restricted components.

The histopathologic concept of selective neuronal death is defined as the loss of a limited number of neurons without coagulation necrosis or cavitation after ischemic insult (1–5); selective neuronal death has been observed in humans (5) and experimental animals (1–4). As in vivo radiologic evidence of selective neuronal loss, hypofixation of iodine-123 iomazenil, a surrogate marker of benzodiazepine receptor or neuronal attenuation, was observed in the reperfused gray matter lacking T2 hyperintensity in patients with acute ischemic stroke (6). Data from radiologic studies suggest that chronic but nonfatal brain ischemia may cause selective neuronal death. Yamauchi et al described similar hypofixation of 123I iomazenil in the apparently normal gray matter of chronic brain ischemia (7). As for the WM, Kado et al used magnetization transfer imaging to examine patients with ipsilateral brain ischemia but without apparent T2 hyperintensity; the results suggested changes in the amount and constitution of the myelin present and demonstrated declines in the magnetization transfer ratio and strong linear correlations between the ratio and the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen2 measured in PET studies (8). Results of these two studies suggest the existence of subtle changes that are broader than the extent of T2 hyperintensity in patients with chronic brain ischemia. Additional changes were inferred from the biophysiologic principles of the radiologic examinations, such as the loss of neurons or myelin content without an increase in the tissue free-water content. Our results indicate decreases in the highly anisotropic slow diffusing component and increases in the fast component. These findings can be interpreted as a loss of axons and myelin content, which contribute to tight diffusion barriers orthogonal to the direction of neural fibers. In light of these results, loss of neurons (axons) and myelination may occur in the WM ipsilateral to an arterial occlusion that is less severe than infarction. Studies in animal models of chronic brain ischemia (32, 33) indicated the WM pathologies, such as disruption of blood-brain barriers (32), axonal loss (33), and demyelination (33). However, similar pathologic changes in human WM are largely unknown.

A limitation of our study was the lack in histopathologic–radiologic correlation. Future pathologic verification in human studies larger than ours is required.

Conclusion

Slow component DTI with high b values may detect occult parenchymal changes in the WM ipsilateral to cerebral arterial occlusive disease.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yoshiaki Someya, Seishi Itoi, and Noriko Inoue for their technical support.

Footnotes

  • Supported in part by a Research Grant for Cardiovascular Diseases (15C-1) from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan.

References

  1. ↵
    Lassen NA. Incomplete cerebral infarction: focal incomplete ischemic tissue necrosis not leading to emollision. Stroke 1982;13:522–523
    FREE Full Text
  2. Kirino T, Tamura A, Sano K. Delayed neuronal death in rat hippocampus following transient forebrain ischemia. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1984;64:139–147
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Garcia JH, Lassen NA, Weiller C, Sperling B, Nakagawara J. Ischemic stroke and incomplete infarction. Stroke 1996;27:761–765
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Garcia JH, Liu KF, Ye ZR, Gutierrez JA. Incomplete infarct and delayed neuronal death after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Stroke 1997;28:2303–2323
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Lassen NA, Losen TS, Højgaard K, Skriver E. Incomplete infarction: a CT-negative irreversible ischemic brain lesion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983;3(suppl 1):S602–S603
  6. ↵
    Nakagawara J, Sperling B, Lassen NA. Incomplete brain infarction of reperfused cortex may be quantitated with iomazenil. Stroke 1997;28:124–132
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Yamauchi H, Fukuyama H, Dong Y, et al. Atrophy of the corpus callosum associated with a decrease in cortical benzodiazepine receptor in large cerebral arterial occlusive diseases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:317–322
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Kado H, Kimura H, Tsuchida T, et al. Abnormal magnetization transfer ratios in normal-appearing white matter on conventional MR images of patients with occlusive cerebrovascular disease. Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:922–927
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B 1994;103:247–254
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Buchsbaum MS, Tang CY, Peled S, et al. MRI white matter diffusion anisotropy and PET metabolic rate in schizophrenia. Neuroreport 1998;9:425–430
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Werring DJ, Clark CA, Barker GJ, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1999;52:1626–1632
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Chabriat H, Pappata S, Poupon C, et al. Clinical severity in CADASIL related to ultrastructural damage in white matter: in vivo study with diffusion tensor MRI. Stroke 1999;30:2637–2643
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Ellis CM, Simmons A, Jones DK, et al. Diffusion tensor MRI assesses corticospinal tract damage in ALS. Neurology 1999;53:1051–1058
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Rose SE, Chen F, Chalk JB, et al. Loss of connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease: an evaluation of white matter tract integrity with colour-coded MR diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:528–530
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Werring DJ, Toosy AT, Clark CA, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging can detect and quantify corticospinal tract degeneration after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:269–272
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Guo AC, Petrella JR, Kurtzberg J, Provenzale JM. Evaluation of white matter anisotropy in Krabbe disease with diffusion tensor MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2001;218:809–815
    PubMed
  17. ↵
    Pomara N, Crandall DT, Choi SJ, Johnson G, Lim KO. White matter abnormalities in HIV-1 infection: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Psychiatry Res 2001;106:15–24
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    O’Sullivan M, Summers PE, Jones DK, Jarosz JM, Williams SCR, Markus HS. Normal-appearing white matter in ischemic leukoaraiosis: a diffusion tensor MRI study. Neurology 2001;57:2307–2310
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    O’Sullivan M, Jones DK, Summers PE, Morris RG, Williams SCR, Markus HS. Evidence for cortical “disconnection” as a mechanism of age-related cognitive decline. Neurology 2001;57:632–638
    FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Inglese M, Salvi F, Iannucci G, Manacardi GL, Mascalchi M, Filippi M. Magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor MR imaging of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:267–272
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Jones DK, Lythgoe D, Horsfield MA, Simmons A, Williams SCR, Markus HS. Characterization of white matter damage in ischemic leukoaraiosis with diffusion tensor MRI. Stroke 1999;30:393–397
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Niendorf T, Dijkhuizen RM, Norris DG, van Lookeren Campagne M, Nicolay K. Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: implications for diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:847–857
    PubMed
  23. Assaf Y, Cohen Y. Non-mono-exponential attenuation of water and N-acetyl aspartate signals due to diffusion in brain tissue. J Magn Reson 1998;131:69–85
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Mulkern RV, Gudbjartsson H, Westin CF, et al. Multi-component apparent diffusion coefficients in human brain. NMR Biomed 1999;12:51–62
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351–356
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965;42:288–292
    CrossRef
  27. ↵
    Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401–407
    PubMed
  28. ↵
    Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ. Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy [erratum appears in Magn Reson Med 1997;37:972]. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:893–906
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Cao Y, Whalen S, Huang J, Berger KL, DeLano MC. Asymmetry of subinsular anisotropy by in vivo diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2003;20:82–90
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Clark CA, Le Bihan D. Water diffusion compartmentation and anisotropy at high b values in the human brain. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:852–859
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Yoshiura T, Mihara F, Tanaka A, et al. High b value diffusion-weighted imaging is more sensitive to white matter degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 2003;20:413–419
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Ueno M, Tomimoto H, Akiguchi I, Wakita H, Sakamoto H. Blood-brain barrier disruption in white matter lesions in a rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:97–104
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Wakita H, Tomimoto H, Akiguchi I, et al. Axonal damage and demyelination in the white matter after chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in the rat. Brain Res 2002;924:63–70
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received August 13, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision November 24, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 6
1 Jun 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Highly Diffusion-Sensitized Tensor Imaging of Unilateral Cerebral Arterial Occlusive Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Atsushi Shiraishi, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Shunichi Okada, Kazumi Kimura, Tohru Sawada, Hidehiro Mizusawa, Kazuo Minematsu
Highly Diffusion-Sensitized Tensor Imaging of Unilateral Cerebral Arterial Occlusive Disease
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2005, 26 (6) 1498-1504;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Highly Diffusion-Sensitized Tensor Imaging of Unilateral Cerebral Arterial Occlusive Disease
Atsushi Shiraishi, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Shunichi Okada, Kazumi Kimura, Tohru Sawada, Hidehiro Mizusawa, Kazuo Minematsu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2005, 26 (6) 1498-1504;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Extent of Microstructural Tissue Damage Correlates with Hemodynamic Failure in High-Grade Carotid Occlusive Disease: An MRI Study Using Quantitative T2 and DSC Perfusion
  • Changes in Integrity of Normal-Appearing White Matter in Patients with Moyamoya Disease: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire