Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Small-Vessel Stents for Intracranial Angioplasty: In Vitro Comparison of Different Stent Designs and Sizes by Using CT Angiography

Stefan Hähnel, Manuel Trossbach, Cora Braun, Sabine Heiland, Michael Knauth, Klaus Sartor and Marius Hartmann
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2003, 24 (8) 1512-1516;
Stefan Hähnel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Trossbach
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cora Braun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabine Heiland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Knauth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Sartor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marius Hartmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    (a) Imaging features of the stents. CT sag indicates sagittal CT image; CT ax, axial CT image; CM, stent filled with diluted contrast medium. The numbers separated by the slash indicate the window width and window level (in Hounsfield units).

    A, 2.0-mm stents.

    B, 3.0-mm stents.

    C, 4.0-mm stents.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Attenuation profile of the BOC3 stent. The difference between two vertical lines represents a distance of 0.5 mm.

    A, BOC3 filled with only NaCl solution only. PNHU<200(NaCl) = 3.

    B, BOC3 filled with diluted contrast medium. PNHU<200(CM) = 0.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    ALN of the stents and tubes when filled with diluted contrast medium. ALN1500/400 was 0% for T3, and ALN500/200 was 0% for T4.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    DIFFHU<200 of the stents. DIFFHU<200 was zero for all 2.0-mm stents.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Properties of the analyzed stents

    Stent or TubeTrade NameManufacturerMaterialStent DesignNominal Stent Length, mmDiameter, mmStrut Thickness, mmStrut Width, mmStent Free Area, %
    NominalDxray*
    2.0 mm
     AVE2AVE S660Medtronic, Minneapolis, MNSS 316 LModular92.52.170.1280.15380
     BSV2aBioDivYsio SVAbbott Vascular Devices, Mervue, UKSS 316 LModular102.01.960.0910.0885–90
     BSV2bBioDivYsio SVAbbott Vascular Devices, Mervue, UKSS 316 LModular102.52.340.0910.0885–90
     NLI2NeurolinkGuidant, Indianapolis, INSS 316 LMC82.02.140.0940.12785
     PSI2PSI-StentDendron, Bochum, GermanyNitinolSHCA202.01.910.060.0685
     TSU2TsunamiTerumo, Tokyo, JapanSS 316 LMC152.02.170.080.0975
     VFL2V-Flex PlusCook, Bloomington, INSS 316 LMC162.51.970.080.08>85
    3.0 mm
     AVE3AVE S670Medtronic, Minneapolis, MNSS 316 LModular93.02.980.1280.15477–83
     BAS3BioDivYsio ASAbbott Vascular Devices, Mervue, UKSS 316 LMC-modular153.03.040.0910.08NA
     BOC3BioDivYsio OCAbbott Vascular Devices, Mervue, UKSS 316 LMC-modular283.03.240.0910.0888–91
     NLI3NeurolinkGuidant, Indianapolis, INSS 316 LMC83.03.260.0940.12787
     PSI3PSI-StentDendron, Bochum, GermanyNitinolSHCA203.02.830.060.0685
     TSU3TsunamiTerumo, Tokyo, JapanSS 316 LMC153.03.040.080.0983
     VFL3V-Flex PlusCook Bloomington, INSS 316 LMC123.03.040.080.08>85
    4.0 mm
     AVE4AVE S670Medtronic, Minneapolis, MNSS 316 LMC-modular124.03.910.1280.15477–83
     BAS4aBioDivYsio ASAbbott Vascular Devices, Mervue, UKSS 316 LMC-modular154.04.130.0910.0875–81
     BAS4bBioDivYsio ASAbbott Vascular Devices, Mervue, UKSS 316 LMC-modular114.03.910.0910.0875–81
     BOC4aBioDivYsio OCAbbott Vascular Devices, Mervue, UKSS 316 LMC-modular283.54.100.0910.0888–91
     BOC4bBioDivYsio OCAbbott Vascular Devices, Mervue, UKSS 316 LMC-modular284.04.070.0910.0888–91
     NLI4NeurolinkGuidant, Indianapolis, INSS 316 LMC84.04.130.0940.12788
     PSI4PSI-StentDendron, Bochum, GermanyNitinolSHCA204.03.620.060.0685
     TSU4TsunamiTerumo, Tokyo, JapanSS 316 LMC154.03.910.080.0988
     VFL4V-Flex PlusCook, Bloomington, INSS 316 LMC123.54.130.080.08>85
    Tube
     T2Tube 2 mmNeoLab, Heidelberg, GermanySiliconeNANA2.0NANANANA
     T3Tube 3 mmNeoLab, Heidelberg, GermanySiliconeNANA3.0NANANANA
     T4Tube 4 mmNeoLab, Heidelberg, GermanySiliconeNANA4.0NANANANA
    • Note.—MC indicates multicellular; NA, not applicable; SHCA, semihelical coil array; and SS, stainless steel.

    • * The diameter of each stent after balloon inflation was calculated on the basis of a radiopaque reference scale that was simultaneously x-ray imaged with the stented tube.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 24 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 24, Issue 8
1 Sep 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Small-Vessel Stents for Intracranial Angioplasty: In Vitro Comparison of Different Stent Designs and Sizes by Using CT Angiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Stefan Hähnel, Manuel Trossbach, Cora Braun, Sabine Heiland, Michael Knauth, Klaus Sartor, Marius Hartmann
Small-Vessel Stents for Intracranial Angioplasty: In Vitro Comparison of Different Stent Designs and Sizes by Using CT Angiography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2003, 24 (8) 1512-1516;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Small-Vessel Stents for Intracranial Angioplasty: In Vitro Comparison of Different Stent Designs and Sizes by Using CT Angiography
Stefan Hähnel, Manuel Trossbach, Cora Braun, Sabine Heiland, Michael Knauth, Klaus Sartor, Marius Hartmann
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2003, 24 (8) 1512-1516;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Carotid Artery Stents: In Vitro Comparison of Different Stent Designs and Sizes Using CT Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 1.5T and 3T
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Rescue Reentry in Carotid Near-Occlusion
  • Contour Neurovascular System: Five Year Follow Up
  • Effect of SARS-CoV2 on Endovascular Thrombectomy
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire