Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Line Scan Diffusion Imaging of the Spine

Roland Bammer, Andreas M. Herneth, Stephan E. Maier, Kim Butts, Rupert W. Prokesch, Huy M. Do, Scott W. Atlas and Michael E. Moseley
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2003, 24 (1) 5-12;
Roland Bammer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas M. Herneth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan E. Maier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim Butts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rupert W. Prokesch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huy M. Do
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott W. Atlas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael E. Moseley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Sagittal line scan diffusion images of the spine of a 28-year-old female volunteer. Line scan diffusion image with diffusion coding (left, b = 650 s/mm2) and without diffusion coding (middle, b = 5 s/mm2) are shown together with the corresponding map of the mean diffusion coefficient (right). No ghosting artifacts or missing lines are apparent. Note the strong diffusion difference between the intervertebral disks and the vertebral bodies.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Contrast changes and corresponding signal intensities over the range of b values used for representative regions of interest for different levels of diffusion weighting.

    A, Three of 10 line scan diffusion images with different levels of diffusion weighting. From left to right: line scan diffusion images with a diffusion attenuation of b = 5672, and 3005 s/mm2 and corresponding map of the mean diffusion coefficients. Although the signal intensity in the intervertebral disks decays rapidly, the signal intensity in the vertebral bodies remains almost unchanged.

    B, Course of diffusion-weighted signal for region of interest measurements in an intervertebral disk and a vertebral body. The plot shows the mean values for the region of interest measurements at different b levels for vertebral body (asterisks), nucleus pulposus (squares), and annulus fibrosus (triangles) and the corresponding fitted models (continuous curves). The effect of the non-Gaussian noise distribution of magnitude MR images is best seen on the fit for nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus. Instead of continuous signal decay, the curve levels off asymptotically. A conventional least squares fit would be strongly biased toward lower values of diffusion if the high b-value data points had been used.

    C, Magnified view of the vertebral segment shown in A shows example regions that were considered for region of interest analyses of vertebral body (VB), nucleus pulposus (NP), and annulus fibrosus (AF). A, anterior; P, posterior; H, head; F, feet.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Line scan diffusion images of one of the female patients with multiple acute histologically proved benign compression fractures in the thoracic spine (T8 [arrow, mean diffusivity = (1376 ± 264) × 10−6 mm2/s]; T10 [curved arrow]; and the compression fracture of the end plate of T5 [arrowhead, mean diffusivity = (829 ± 59) × 10−6 mm2/s]). Two separate imaging sessions were required to cover the entire spine of this patient because of kyphosis. To image the upper part of the spine, the imaging plane had to be rotated around the left-right axis so that the readout dimension of the line scan diffusion image aligns with the spinal column.

    A, Isotropic diffusion-weighted image of the upper spine.

    B, Unweighted image of the upper spine.

    C, Map of the mean diffusion coefficient of the upper spine.

    D, Isotropic diffusion-weighted image of the lower spine.

    E, Unweighted image of the lower spine.

    F, Map of the mean diffusion coefficient of the lower spine.

    G, Corresponding conventional sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo image. The extent of pathologic signal alteration is consistent with that seen on the line scan diffusion images. Only faint signal intensity changes are seen in the fractured end plate of T5 (arrowhead), whereas on the map of the mean diffusion coefficient, the abnormalities in this vertebral body can be more clearly delineated. The signal intensity changes of the compression fracture in T8 (arrow) correspond with hyperintensities in the diffusion coefficient maps.

    H, Corresponding conventional sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo image with fat suppression. A biopsy specimen was obtained in the center of the lesion in T10 (curved arrow). The mean diffusivity was markedly higher [(1972 ± 145) × 10−6 mm2/s] than that of the anterior aspect [(1764 ρ 287) υ 10−6 mm2/s]. The extent of pathologic signal intensity alteration is consistent with that seen on the line scan diffusion images.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Line scan diffusion images (A–C) and fast spin-echo image (D) of an 85-year-old female patient with multiple hemangioma lesions at almost every level in the spine. The mean diffusivity measured in these lesions ranged from 1019 × 10−6 mm2/s to 1321 × 10−6 mm2/s. At the T12 level (arrows), vertebroplasty had been performed previously by injection of polymethylmethacrylate and, as expected, the diffusion coefficient was low (204 ± 123 × 10−6 mm2/s).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Sets of line scan diffusion images of a 48-year-old female volunteer. The images were used for comparison of off-resonance effects.

    A, Receiver bandwidth of ± 15.63 kHz.

    B, Bandwidth of ± 7.8 kHz. Despite the better signal-to-noise ratio, the quality of the images with lower signal-to-noise ratios clearly suffers from strong water-fat shift artifacts. In both sets, diffusion-weighted (left column) and unweighted (middle column) images are shown with their corresponding maps of mean diffusivity (right column).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 24 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 24, Issue 1
1 Jan 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Line Scan Diffusion Imaging of the Spine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Roland Bammer, Andreas M. Herneth, Stephan E. Maier, Kim Butts, Rupert W. Prokesch, Huy M. Do, Scott W. Atlas, Michael E. Moseley
Line Scan Diffusion Imaging of the Spine
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2003, 24 (1) 5-12;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Line Scan Diffusion Imaging of the Spine
Roland Bammer, Andreas M. Herneth, Stephan E. Maier, Kim Butts, Rupert W. Prokesch, Huy M. Do, Scott W. Atlas, Michael E. Moseley
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2003, 24 (1) 5-12;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion Imaging of the Human Spinal Cord: Comparison with Conventional Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging
  • Myelopathy but normal MRI: where next?
  • Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Spine: Is It Reliable?
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimization of Photon Counting CT Myelography
  • Characteristics of SIH Type I Culprit Lesions
  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire