Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

EditorialEDITORIAL

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: New Findings and Old Questions

Robert A. Fishman and William P. Dillon
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2001, 22 (9) 1640-1641;
Robert A. Fishman
M.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William P. Dillon
M.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), a form of communicating hydrocephalus, is characterized by normal mean CSF pressure. MR imaging is essential to establish the presence of ventricular dilatation and to exclude other conditions that also may be responsible for the clinical triad of gait disorder, mental slowing, and urinary incontinence. Clinical features that support the diagnosis of NPH include a recent or remote history of subarachnoid bleeding or meningitis and mental changes of a “subcortical dementia,” typified by slowness of responses (bradyphrenia), and dullness and apathy, different from early Alzheimer's disease. The gait is typically slow and unsteady with magnetic responses (as if the feet are stuck to the floor) and gait apraxia. The “CSF tap test,” with which some CSF is removed by means of lumbar puncture, may be of value despite false-negative and false-positive tests, but only if the test is well standardized (such as comparing the time required to walk a standard distance before and after large volume CSF drainage). Lumbar puncture is essential to establish that the CSF pressure is normal and to exclude a chronic meningitis that can be responsible for large ventricles and the clinical features of NPH. An elevated protein (≤3000 mg/dL) may be the sole indicator of a spinal neoplasm responsible for the syndrome of NPH.

The major diagnostic challenge is to differentiate NPH from cerebral atrophy and deep white matter ischemic, both far more common causes of the clinical triad than NPH. Although NPH and cerebral ischemic changes often concur, the clinician's major question for the neuroradiologist is whether the ventricular enlargement observed is consonant with the degree of enlargement of the cortical sulci (ie, is it hydrocephalus ex vacuo due to cerebral atrophy or is it communicating hydrocephalus?). Unfortunately, many radiologists fail to address this question in their clinical reports. Other MR imaging features of NPH that have been proposed include the “aqueductal flow void sign” and increased CSF stroke volume (1), but these remain controversial (2). Isotope cisternography has also been proposed for the evaluation of NPH. Despite the occurrence of ventricular reflux of isotope in NPH, its presence does not reliably predict which patients will have favorable outcomes after shunt surgery; similarly, its absence does not preclude a favorable response to shunt surgery.

MR imaging in cases of hydrocephalus also reveals thinning of the periventricular white matter associated with hyperintensities of the subependymal and deep white matter. Such findings, suggesting small vessel ischemia, are commonly associated with hypertension, diabetes, and aging, as well as with NPH. There has been much speculation regarding their pathogenesis. Unfortunately, there has been insufficient correlation of the imaging data and the neuropathologic findings. Although the degree of subcortical ischemia is inversely correlated with outcome from shunt surgery, this should not preclude the diagnosis of NPH.

New insight into the significance of the white matter changes in hydrocephalus is provided by Tullberg et al (page 1665) who describe two different changes in the white matter in NPH, “smooth periventricular hyperintensities” and “irregular deep white matter hyperintensities.” The authors observed that only the irregular deep white matter hyperintensities were improved after successful shunt surgery. They also conclude that the decision to perform shunt surgery should not be negatively influenced by the presence of diffuse white matter hyperintensities or lacunar infarctions, which concurs with findings of previous investigators (3). Moreover, they did not find any MR imaging features that were prospectively associated with the diagnosis of NPH. Thus, they support the opinion that the decision to perform shunt surgery should be based largely on clinical findings and MR imaging studies that indicate that brain atrophy is not responsible for the ventriculomegaly.

Unfortunately, many old questions regarding the cause and diagnosis of NPH remain unanswered (4). What are the rates of CSF formation and absorption in healthy volunteers and in patients with NPH? Is the transmural pressure gradient from the ventricles to the subarachnoid space responsible for the enlargement of the lateral ventricles? How does NPH bring about the clinical triad? How much CSF is formed within the cerebral hemispheres compared with the secretion of CSF by the choroid plexus in healthy volunteers versus in that of patients with hydrocephalus? What mechanism underlies the restoration of white matter thickness after successful shunt surgery? How reliable is CSF drainage in predicting the response to shunt surgery? NPH is an uncommon problem that is subject to over-diagnosis as well as under-diagnosis. We anticipate that diagnosis and patient care will become more coherent when the pathophysiology of NPH is better understood.

References

  1. ↵
    Bradley WG, Scalzo D, Queralt J, Nitz W, Atkinson DJ, Wong P. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523-529
    PubMed
  2. ↵
    Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, Jungling FD, Droste DW, Wakhloo AK. Flow void of cerebrospinal fluid in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: can it predict outcome after shunting? Neurosurgery 1997;40:67-74
    PubMed
  3. ↵
    Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, et al. The Dutch Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus Study: the role of cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg 1999;90:221-226
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Fishman RA. Cerebrospinal Fluid in Diseases of the Nervous System. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1992:106–116
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 22 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 22, Issue 9
1 Oct 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: New Findings and Old Questions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Robert A. Fishman, William P. Dillon
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: New Findings and Old Questions
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2001, 22 (9) 1640-1641;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: New Findings and Old Questions
Robert A. Fishman, William P. Dillon
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2001, 22 (9) 1640-1641;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Supporting Imaging Research: A Framework for Equity and Excellence in Neuroradiology
  • Neuroimaging within the Stroke Treatment Paradigm – An Update from the Brain Attack Coalition
  • Advancing Neuroradiology through Innovation and Member Engagement
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire