Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleHead and Neck Imaging

In Vivo 1H MR Spectroscopy of Human Head and Neck Lymph Node Metastasis and Comparison with Oxygen Tension Measurements

Josh M. Star-Lack, Eifar Adalsteinsson, Markus F. Adam, David J. Terris, Harlan A. Pinto, J. Martin Brown and Daniel M. Spielman
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2000, 21 (1) 183-193;
Josh M. Star-Lack
aFrom the Lucas MRS Imaging Center (J.S.L., E.A., D.M.S.), Department of Radiology, the Department of Radiation Oncology/Division of Radiation Biology (M.F.A., J.M.B.), the Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery (D.J.T.), and the Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Oncology Division Department of Medicine (H.A.P.), Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eifar Adalsteinsson
aFrom the Lucas MRS Imaging Center (J.S.L., E.A., D.M.S.), Department of Radiology, the Department of Radiation Oncology/Division of Radiation Biology (M.F.A., J.M.B.), the Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery (D.J.T.), and the Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Oncology Division Department of Medicine (H.A.P.), Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus F. Adam
aFrom the Lucas MRS Imaging Center (J.S.L., E.A., D.M.S.), Department of Radiology, the Department of Radiation Oncology/Division of Radiation Biology (M.F.A., J.M.B.), the Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery (D.J.T.), and the Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Oncology Division Department of Medicine (H.A.P.), Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Terris
aFrom the Lucas MRS Imaging Center (J.S.L., E.A., D.M.S.), Department of Radiology, the Department of Radiation Oncology/Division of Radiation Biology (M.F.A., J.M.B.), the Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery (D.J.T.), and the Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Oncology Division Department of Medicine (H.A.P.), Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harlan A. Pinto
aFrom the Lucas MRS Imaging Center (J.S.L., E.A., D.M.S.), Department of Radiology, the Department of Radiation Oncology/Division of Radiation Biology (M.F.A., J.M.B.), the Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery (D.J.T.), and the Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Oncology Division Department of Medicine (H.A.P.), Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Martin Brown
aFrom the Lucas MRS Imaging Center (J.S.L., E.A., D.M.S.), Department of Radiology, the Department of Radiation Oncology/Division of Radiation Biology (M.F.A., J.M.B.), the Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery (D.J.T.), and the Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Oncology Division Department of Medicine (H.A.P.), Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel M. Spielman
aFrom the Lucas MRS Imaging Center (J.S.L., E.A., D.M.S.), Department of Radiology, the Department of Radiation Oncology/Division of Radiation Biology (M.F.A., J.M.B.), the Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery (D.J.T.), and the Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Oncology Division Department of Medicine (H.A.P.), Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 1.

    Dual BASING with PRESS excitation. The two BASING pulses (RFB1 and RFB1) are separated in time by TE = 2 msec. For Cycle 1, the Lac methine quartet is included in the BASING inversion band, whereas for Cycle 2, the BASING center frequency is shifted downfield to exclude all metabolites of interest. The addition of Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 spectra yields the singlets, whereas the subtraction of Cycle 2 from Cycle 1 yields the Lac methyl doublet

  • fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 2.

    Data from a representative hypoxic node in patient 7.

    A, T2-weighted image (3000/85/2) shows the location of the PRESS box.

    B, Histogram of oxygenation measurements. The median pO2 value is 1.3 mm Hg, which is very suggestive of hypoxia.

    C, Uncoupled (Cycle 1 + Cycle 2).

    D, Coupled (Cycle 1—Cycle 2).

    E, Error spectra acquired with MRS parameters of 2000/144/256. The Cho:Cr ratio is 1.3.

  • fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 3.

    Data from a hypoxic node in patient 1.

    A, T2-weighted image (3000/85/2) shows the location of the PRESS box.

    B, Histogram of oxygen measurements. The median pO2 value is 0.7 mm Hg.

    C, Uncoupled (Cycle 1 + Cycle 2).

    D, Coupled (Cycle 1—Cycle 2).

    E, Error spectra acquired with MRS parameters of 2000/144/256. The Cho:Cr ratio is 4.3.

  • fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 4.

    Data from a more aerobic node in patient 2.

    A, T2-weighted image (3000/85/2) shows the location of the PRESS box.

    B, Histogram of oxygen measurements. The median pO2 value is 14.1 mm Hg, which is more aerobic than the median values for patients 1 and 7.

    C, Uncoupled (Cycle 1 + Cycle 2).

    D, Coupled (Cycle 1—Cycle 2).

    E, Error spectra acquired with MRS parameters of 2000/144/256. The Cho:Cr ratio is 3.9.

  • fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 5.

    Representative muscle spectrum.

    A, T1-weighted image (500/8/2) from a normal volunteer shows the location of the PRESS box enclosing muscle tissue.

    B, Uncoupled (Cycle 1 + Cycle 2).

    C, Coupled (Cycle 1—Cycle 2).

    D, Error spectra acquired with MRS parameters of 2000/144/256. The Cho:Cr ratio is 0.48, and the lipid suppression factor is greater than 3000.

  • fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 6.

    Accumulated Lac measurements.

    A, Scatter plot of Lac SI versus pO2. The error bars are the SD after including the computed error signal (see fig 2C). A linear fit yielded a Pearson's correlation coefficient of −0.74.

    B, Scatter plot of Lac/H2O versus pO2. The Pearson's coefficient is −0.76. The average water signal was used for normalizing the three samples with darkened boxes.

    C, Box and whiskers plot for three data groups: pO2 < 10 mm Hg, pO2 ≥ 10 mm Hg, and muscle. All three groups are statistically different (P < 0.05). The mean values for each group are annotated (0.60, 0.28, −0.05). The boxes span the range of Lac signal intensities from the 25th to 75th percentiles. The bars within the boxes denote the median value, whereas the vertical lines (“whiskers”) are reflective of the data range.

  • fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    fig 7.

    Accumulated Cho and Cr measurements.

    A, Scatter plots of Cho SI versus pO2.

    B, Scatter plots of Cho/H2O SI versus pO2. The correlation coefficients are −0.43 and−0.45, respectively. The average water signal was used for normalizing the three samples darkened black boxes.

    C, Box and whiskers plots of Cho SI for three data groups: pO2 < 10 mm Hg, pO2 ≥ 10 mm Hg, and muscle. The mean Cho values are annotated, and the data were not statistically different.

    D, Box and whiskers plots of Cho:Cr ratios show statistically significant differentiation between muscle and cancer. The mean values are annotated.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table1

    Clinical parameters

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 21, Issue 1
1 Jan 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vivo 1H MR Spectroscopy of Human Head and Neck Lymph Node Metastasis and Comparison with Oxygen Tension Measurements
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Josh M. Star-Lack, Eifar Adalsteinsson, Markus F. Adam, David J. Terris, Harlan A. Pinto, J. Martin Brown, Daniel M. Spielman
In Vivo 1H MR Spectroscopy of Human Head and Neck Lymph Node Metastasis and Comparison with Oxygen Tension Measurements
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2000, 21 (1) 183-193;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
In Vivo 1H MR Spectroscopy of Human Head and Neck Lymph Node Metastasis and Comparison with Oxygen Tension Measurements
Josh M. Star-Lack, Eifar Adalsteinsson, Markus F. Adam, David J. Terris, Harlan A. Pinto, J. Martin Brown, Daniel M. Spielman
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2000, 21 (1) 183-193;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Focal MR spectroscopy of hippocampal CA-1 lesions in transient global amnesia
  • Identification of Prognostic Markers in Bone Sarcomas Using Proton-Decoupled Phosphorus Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • MRI of the Parasellar Ligaments
  • ASL Sensitivity for Head and Neck Paraganglioma
  • Post SRS Peritumoral Hyperintense Signal of VSs
Show more Head and Neck Imaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire