Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Comprehensive Analysis of Neurologic Complications following Transradial Cerebral Angiography

Hoon Kim, Hyeong Jin Lee, Seon Woong Choi, Sunghan Kim, Seong-Rim Kim and Ik Seong Park
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8625
Hoon Kim
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hoon Kim
Hyeong Jin Lee
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hyeong Jin Lee
Seon Woong Choi
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sunghan Kim
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sunghan Kim
Seong-Rim Kim
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ik Seong Park
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Graphical Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transradial access (TRA) for cerebral angiography has become more popular due to fewer complications and greater patient comfort compared with transfemoral access. However, the frequency and nature of neurologic complications linked to TRA remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the incidence of symptomatic neurologic complications after transradial cerebral angiography, identify risk factors, and characterize clinical and imaging features of these complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1679 consecutive cases of transradial cerebral angiography from a single institution between January 2018 and December 2020. Neurologic complications were defined as any symptomatic changes confirmed by DWI revealing ischemic lesions. A case-control matching method was used to enhance the reliability of the results. Clinical, procedural, and anatomic factors were examined for predictors of neurologic complications.

RESULTS: Neurologic complications occurred in 1.0% (n = 19) of cases, with 85% occurring within 6 hours postprocedure. No significant predictors of neurologic complications could be identified among the clinical, procedural, or anatomic factors assessed. Overall, 58% of patients experienced transient or reversible complications. Patients with permanent symptoms had mild to moderate disability (mRS scores of 1 or 2), with no severe disability (mRS score ≥3). DWI commonly showed multifocal cortical or subcortical ischemic patterns, typically affecting the right middle cerebral artery territory or multiple territories, suggesting embolic mechanisms as a potential cause.

CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic complications following transradial cerebral angiography were rare but occurred early in the postprocedural period. The observed ischemic patterns, particularly the right-sided predominance, suggest embolic mechanisms as a potential cause. However, further large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are essential to identify risk factors more clearly and enhance patient safety in this increasingly utilized transradial approach.

ABBREVIATIONS:

ACA
anterior cerebral artery
ICAS
intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis
PCA
posterior cerebral artery
SCA
subclavian artery
TFA
transfemoral access
TRA
transradial access
VAO
vertebral artery orifice
VBA
vertebrobasilar artery

SUMMARY

PREVIOUS LITERATURE:

Previous studies have compared the safety and efficacy of transradial and transfemoral cerebral angiography, reporting lower overall complication rates in the transradial approach. However, data specific to neurologic complications associated with the transradial approach remain sparse, with inconsistent findings regarding their incidence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic implications. This gap highlights the need for dedicated research on neurologic outcomes associated with transradial cerebral angiography.

KEY FINDINGS:

Neurologic complications occurred in 1% (19/1902) of transradial cerebral angiography cases, with 85% manifesting within 6 hours postprocedure and 58% experiencing transient symptoms with no severe disabilities. DWI showed multifocal cortical/subcortical ischemic patterns, predominantly in the right MCA territory.

KNOWLEDGE ADVANCEMENT:

This study highlights the low incidence of neurologic complications in transradial cerebral angiography and provides detailed analyses of lesion patterns and clinical outcomes. These findings support safer procedural strategies and highlight the importance of future studies comparing the transradial and transfemoral approaches.

Transradial access (TRA) has emerged as a preferred technique for cerebral angiography due to its lower complication rates and greater patient comfort compared with transfemoral access (TFA).1⇓-3 While the benefits of TRA are well-established, the incidence and characteristics of neurologic complications that can impact outcomes following DSA remain unclear.

Previous studies on transradial cerebral angiography have primarily focused on procedural success rates and access site complications, such as radial artery occlusion and hematoma formation.4⇓⇓⇓-8 However, these studies often fall short in addressing neurologic complications, likely due to limitations in sample size and a secondary emphasis on such events. This gap in knowledge has left the nature, frequency, and risk factors associated with neurologic complications following transradial cerebral angiography largely unexplored.

To address this gap, we performed a large-scale retrospective study of transradial cerebral angiography cases, focusing specifically on symptomatic neurologic complications. Our primary objectives were to determine the incidence, identify risk factors, and comprehensively characterize clinical and DWI findings. We used a rigorous case-control matching method to improve the robustness of our conclusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient Demographics

We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single institution between January 2018 and December 2020. Excluding cases of transfemoral diagnostic cerebral angiography, a total of 1902 consecutive transradial diagnostic cerebral angiography cases were included. Neurologic complications occurred in 19 cases (1.0%). The exclusion criteria were 1) spinal angiography or venography, 2) transradial angiography with therapeutic procedures, and 3) emergency angiography for hemorrhagic stroke. For patients without neurologic complications, only their initial examination was considered. In cases in which multiple cerebral angiographies were performed before or after experiencing a neurologic complication, only the examination in which the first such complication occurred was included.

After applying the exclusion criteria, 1679 cases were eligible for inclusion and were categorized into 2 groups based on the occurrence of neurologic complications (1660 cases in the control group and 19 cases in the neurologic complication group). Clinical and radiologic data were collected from electronic medical records and a prospectively maintained transradial diagnostic cerebral angiography database. Our study on neurologic complications following transradial cerebral angiography encompassed 4 critical dimensions: quantifying their occurrence rate, exploring associated risk factors, detailing their clinical manifestations, and characterizing their distinct DWI patterns.

This observational cohort study adhered to the principles outlined in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement for observational studies (Supplemental Data).9 The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, approved by our institutional review board, and granted a waiver for informed consent (subject number: HC22RASI0094).

Definition of Predictive Factors Contributing to Neurologic Complications

Predictive factors for neurologic complications after transradial cerebral angiography were classified and analyzed based on clinical, angiographic, and anatomic criteria. The specific factors collected are outlined in the Table. Clinical factors included patient demographics (sex, age); procedure indications (aneurysm, atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease, Moyamoya disease, vascular malformation, dissection, tumor); medical history (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, cardiac disease, prior stroke, smoking); and laboratory parameters (hemoglobin, white blood cell count, platelet count, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, coagulation profiles—prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and lipid panels—total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein). Atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease includes transient ischemic attack, ischemic stroke, intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Laboratory data were taken from the most recent values available on the day of angiography or before the procedure. Abnormal values were defined as any result outside the reference range, regardless of whether above or below normal limits. The number of cases with abnormal values was recorded. Clinical factors also included prior interventions, such as a history of extracranial or intracranial stent placements, prior craniotomies, and the number of DSA procedures previously conducted.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Overview of predictive factors for neurologic complications following transradial cerebral angiography

Angiographic factors included the duration of the procedure, the number of vessels examined, the number of selective angiographies performed, and whether a 3D rotational angiography was conducted.

Anatomic factors covered the type of aortic arch, the angulation of the right subclavian artery (SCA), and stenosis in both extracranial arteries (including the right SCA, proximal ICA, and vertebral artery orifice [VAO]) and intracranial arteries. The definitions of anatomic factors are as follows: 1) the type of aortic arch was classified into 3 groups according to the classification by Casserly et al10; 2) the angulation of the right subclavian artery was categorized as normal, tortuosity, kinking, or looping according to the modified criteria of Weibel and Fields11 and Metz et al12 (angulation was defined as angle between vessel segment: tortuosity ≥60°, kinking 30°–60°, looping <30°); and 3) the degree of stenosis in both extracranial and intracranial arteries, excluding the proximal ICA, was measured by using the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease method,13 with stenosis defined as >50%. For the proximal ICA, stenosis was assessed by using the NASCET method,14 also defined as >50%. Anatomic data were collected from contrast-enhanced MRA or CTA performed within 3 months of the procedure.

Definition of Neurologic Complications and DWI Patterns

The study investigated the characteristics of neurologic complications following transradial cerebral angiography including frequency, onset timing, symptoms, duration, and prognosis. Neurologic complications were defined as any alteration in the patient’s neurologic status after cerebral angiography, confirmed by identifying cerebral infarction on DWI. DWI was conducted only when symptoms of neurologic complications emerged to confirm the presence of lesions. Complications were classified as transient, reversible, or persistent based on symptom duration. Transient complications were those that resolved within 24 hours after the examination. Reversible complications persisted for more than 24 hours but resolved within 7 days. Persistent complications were those that extended beyond 7 days. Patients were admitted on a 2-night, 3-day schedule, allowing for structured preprocedural preparation and postprocedural monitoring. When neurologic complications occurred, the hospital stay was extended based on clinical need. For asymptomatic patients, a follow-up visit was conducted 1 month after the angiography to confirm the absence of delayed symptom onset. For symptomatic patients, the prognosis was evaluated by using the mRS score obtained 3 months after the onset of neurologic complications.

The study also analyzed the distribution and patterns of lesions on DWI in cerebral infarction cases following transradial cerebral angiography. DWI was categorized into cortical/subcortical, white matter/perforator, territorial, and mixed patterns based on anatomic and physiologic features. The distribution of DWI lesions was classified by the affected vascular territories, including the anterior cerebral artery (ACA), MCA, posterior cerebral artery (PCA), and vertebrobasilar artery (VBA). Lesions spanning 2 or more vascular territories were classified as “Multiple.” The study also investigated the multiplicity of lesions and their characteristics, defining multiplicity as the presence of multiple diffusion-restricted lesions on DWI, whether confined to a single vascular territory or spread across several. If multiple lesions were present, they were classified as bilateral or unilateral, depending on whether they involved 1 or both hemispheres. For unilateral lesions, dominance was examined to identify the predominant lateralization, indicating a preference for either the right or left hemisphere. Additionally, bicirculation involvement, defined as the simultaneous presence of lesions in both anterior and posterior circulations, was assessed.

Radial Angiography Technique

The angiographic method of TRA used in our study mirrored those in previous research.1,5 All patients scheduled for angiography were admitted to the hospital the day before the procedure for thorough preparation. To lower the risk of ischemic complications, aspirin 100 mg and Plavix 75 mg were administered daily for 1 week before the procedure at the discretion of the attending physician. The radial artery served as the access point for all transradial angiography cases. A 5F Glidesheath Slender (Terumo Interventional Systems) 7 cm introducer sheath, a 5F Radifocus Glidecath Simmons/Sidewinder type 2 catheter (Cook), and a 0.035-inch Radifocus guidewire (Terumo Interventional Systems) were the primary tools used. After local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine, the radial artery was punctured by using a 20-gauge needle with a modified Seldinger technique. Once the 5F introducer sheath was in place, a nitroglycerine solution (1 mg/mL; 1 mL mixed in 49 mL of normal saline) was infused through the side port of the introducer to prevent radial artery spasm. A dose of 2000 IU of IV heparin was administered systemically, unless contraindicated due to underlying medical conditions, to prevent thrombosis. Continuous catheter flushing with heparinized saline was routinely used in all cases to maintain patency and prevent thromboembolic events. Iodixanol 320 mg/mL (Visipaque, GE Healthcare), a nonionic, dimeric, water-soluble contrast medium, was used for angiography. The technique for folding the Simmons catheter curve was consistent with the conventional method, involving catheter placement in the descending thoracic aorta or folding the Simmons catheter curve within the ascending aorta.15 All cerebral angiography procedures were performed by attending physicians or by fellows under direct attending supervision.

Statistical Analysis

In line with findings observed in studies of transfemoral cerebral angiography,16,17 neurologic complications following transradial angiography are infrequent. To address potential bias stemming from the limited sample size, a case-control matching analysis was performed. Cases and controls were matched at a 1:4 ratio to ensure a well-balanced comparison by using the greedy algorithm and a macro developed by Kosanke and Bergstralh.18 The variables used for matching included demographic and clinical covariates such as age, sex, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, heart disease, ischemic stroke, smoking status, and antiplatelet medication use. For age, a match was defined as a difference of 5 years or less. Descriptive statistics for demographic characteristics were calculated both before and after matching. Before matching, comparative analyses of patient and angiographic characteristics were done by using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categoric variables and an independent t test for continuous variables. After matching, McNemar test was used for categoric variables, and paired t tests for continuous variables. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (first and third quartiles), and categoric variables as frequencies and percentages.

The association between neurologic complications following transradial cerebral angiography and predictive angiographic factors was evaluated by using conditional logistic regression, accounting for the matched design. ORs and their 95% CIs were calculated. Statistical tests were 2-sided, and P values < .05 were considered significant. All analyses, including matching analysis, were performed by using SAS Version 9.4 (SAS Institute).

RESULTS

Characteristics of Patient Demographics

The Supplemental Data summarize the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, categorized by the presence or absence of neurologic complication, both before and after matching. The analysis showed that patients without infarction were initially older than those with neurologic complication (67.29 ± 12.21 versus 58.74 ± 11.42 years, P = .0024). However, this age difference was minimized after matching (P = .9398), indicating effective age-based pairing. There was no significant difference in the distribution of male sex between groups before or after matching.

In terms of risk factors, medical histories such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, heart disease, and prior strokes showed no significant differences between the groups before matching. After matching, these variables were balanced between groups. Additionally, smoking habits and antiplatelet medication use showed minimal differences between groups, both before and after matching.

Regarding laboratory results, most parameters, including hemoglobin, white blood cell count, platelet count, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and prothrombin time, did not differ significantly between the groups. However, significant differences were observed between the groups after matching in the number of cases with abnormal values for activated partial thromboplastin time (P = .0339) and lipid profile components, including triglycerides (P = .0001), high-density lipoprotein (P = .0495), and low-density lipoprotein (P = .0201).

Summary of Transradial Cerebral Angiography and Risk Factors for Neurologic Complications

Our study examined clinical, procedural, and anatomic predictors of neurologic complications in transradial cerebral angiography, with logistic regression results summarized in the Supplemental Data. Clinically, neither stent placement history (OR = 1.881, P = .5501), prior craniotomies (insufficient data), nor the number of previous DSAs (OR = 1.459, P = .4126) showed a significant impact on complication rates.

Procedurally, the average procedure time was slightly longer for patients with infarction (20.31 minutes) compared with those without (17.74 minutes), but the increased risk per minute was not significant (OR = 1.060, P = .1966). Techniques such as the number of vessels examined (OR = 0.289, P = .3809), number of selective angiographies (OR = 0.947, P = .8343), and use of 3D rotational angiography (OR = 0.756, P = .6856) had no significant influence on complication rates.

Anatomically, variations in aortic arch type and stenosis in critical extracranial arteries—such as the right SCA, proximal ICA, VAO, and ICAS—did not significantly affect complication rates.

Characteristics of Neurologic Complications in Transradial Cerebral Angiography

The characteristics of neurologic complications in transradial cerebral angiography are summarized in the Supplemental Data.

The primary diagnoses leading to complications were aneurysms (47%), atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease (37%), Moyamoya disease (11%), and intracranial tumors (5%). Furthermore, hemiparesis was the most prevalent symptom of a neurologic complication, and occurred in 42% of affected patients, while aphasia, sensory disturbances, and visual disturbances each occurred in 16% of cases. Mental status changes were reported in 11%, all of which were transient. Notably, no cases of contrast-induced encephalopathy were observed in our cohort.

Neurologic symptoms emerged most frequently within the first 3 hours postprocedure (53% of cases), with 85% occurring within 6 hours. Although a few cases were presented later, all complications manifested within 24 hours, with none beyond that point. Among affected patients, 58% experienced transient or reversible symptoms, and 53% had mRS scores of 0, indicating no residual disability. In cases with permanent symptoms, mRS scores were 1 (16%) or 2 (26%), with no patient showing an mRS score of 3 or higher, suggesting that severe disability was not observed in this cohort.

Summary of Infarction and DWI Pattern

The distribution and pattern of lesions on DWI in cerebral infarction following transradial cerebral angiography were systematically analyzed (Supplemental Data). Most patients (79%) exhibited multiple lesions. Cortical/subcortical lesions were the most common DWI pattern (58%), while white matter/perforator patterns were observed in 11%. Mixed patterns involving both cortical/subcortical and white matter/perforator lesions were noted in 32%. No territorial DWI patterns were seen.

Most neurologic complications were localized to the MCA region (53%). Complications involving multiple brain regions were common, affecting 42% of patients. No lesions were observed in the ACA or PCA regions, while VBA lesions were present in 5% of cases.

Further DWI analysis showed that 63% of cases demonstrated bilateral abnormalities, indicating a tendency for bilateral brain involvement. There was also marked lesion lateralization, with right-sided dominance in 84% of cases compared with 16% on the left. Bicirculation, involving both anterior and posterior circulations, was identified in 42% of patients.

DISCUSSION

This study comprehensively analyzed neurologic complications in transradial cerebral angiography, focusing on incidence, risk factors, and clinical and imaging characteristics. Among 1902 consecutive cases enrolled initially, neurologic complications occurred in 19 cases, resulting in a 1.0% complication rate. Despite thorough analysis of clinical, procedural, and anatomic variables, no significant predictors of complications were identified. Notably, 85% of complications occurred within the first 6 hours postprocedure. A large proportion of patients (58%) experienced transient or reversible symptoms, with none exhibiting severe disability (mRS score ≥3), suggesting a generally favorable prognosis. DWI in patients with complications revealed a high prevalence of multiple lesions, typically presenting with a multifocal cortical/subcortical ischemic pattern, predominantly in the MCA region with right-sided dominance.

Incidence of Neurologic Complications

Conventional DSA remains the reference standard for diagnosing cerebrovascular disease, but its invasive nature and associated complications are significant concerns.19 Neurologic complications, while less common than other types, can lead to severe outcomes and require careful monitoring. Previous studies report the incidence of neurologic complications following transfemoral cerebral angiography ranges from 0%–3.56%, with permanent complications between 0% and 0.48%.17,20⇓⇓⇓⇓-25 In comparison, neurologic complication rates after transradial cerebral angiography are reported to be 0.08%–1.00%, with permanent complications from 0%–0.42%.6,7,26 In our study, the overall incidence of neurologic complications was 1.0%, with permanent complications occurring at a rate of 0.42%. Although comparing incidences across studies has limitations, considering the necessity of cerebral angiography and the benefits of TRA, the complication rates observed here appear acceptable. Thus, transradial angiography remains a feasible approach, given the low frequency of neurologic complications (Supplemental Data).

Risk Factors for Neurologic Complications

The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with ischemic complications after transradial cerebral angiography. Despite an extensive analysis of suspected risk factors, including patient history, procedure time, angiographic techniques, and anatomic variations, no significant predictors were found. Although there were significant differences in activated partial thromboplastin time and lipid profile components, such as triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein, the clinical relevance remains uncertain. The absence of significant predictors may be due to several factors. Statistically, the small sample size might have limited the detection of associations. Clinically, the results could suggest that the investigated factors do not strongly influence ischemic complications. Complications may also arise from complex interactions among multiple factors in clinical practice. Furthermore, factors not considered in this study, such as aortic atheroma, should be considered.27,28 Further studies are required to confirm these findings and evaluate their clinical importance.

Clinical Characteristics of Neurologic Complications

We identified several key characteristics of neurologic complications after transradial cerebral angiography. Hemiparesis was the most common symptom, affecting 42% of patients. However, the range of neurologic deficits was broad, including aphasia, sensory disturbances, visual impairments, and mental status changes. This diversity highlights the importance of thorough neurologic assessment in the postprocedural period. Our analysis also showed a distinct pattern in symptom onset, with 85% of complications occurring within 6 hours and 53% appearing in the first 3 hours. This underscores the need for close monitoring during the early postprocedural period, as most complications arise within this time. Prognostically, our data suggest a favorable outlook. Most patients (58%) had transient or reversible symptoms, indicating a strong potential for recovery. Even among those with permanent symptoms, outcomes were promising, with 53% achieving an mRS score of 0, meaning no residual disability. No patients had an mRS score over 2, suggesting that persistent complications typically resulted in only mild to moderate disability.

These findings highlight the pattern of neurologic complications in transradial cerebral angiography, emphasizing the importance of early detection and intervention. The predominance of recoverable complications and absence of severe disability suggest that focused care during the early postprocedural period can significantly improve patient outcomes.

Characteristics of DWI Findings

This study found that infarctions following transradial cerebral angiography were primarily characterized by a multifocal cortical/subcortical ischemic pattern, with a focus on the right MCA territory or multiple territories. The right-sided predominance and high occurrence of multiple and bilateral lesions provide insights into the pathophysiology and suggest possible unidentified risk factors.

The MCA territory was affected in 53% of cases, and multiterritory involvement occurred in 42% of patients. This distribution suggests that embolic mechanisms could play a significant role. The strong right-sided dominance, with 84% of DWI lesions on the right compared with 16% on the left, may be related to procedural techniques or anatomic factors, particularly catheter movement in the brachiocephalic trunk. The complexity of these complications is underscored by bilateral lesions in 63% of cases and involvement of both anterior and posterior circulations in 42%, indicating more intricate mechanisms than previously understood. Further studies examining catheter manipulation techniques and vascular anatomic variations may clarify these complications.

This study has some limitations. First, the retrospective design may introduce selection bias, despite the use of case-control matching. While this approach allowed us to analyze a larger number of cases, a prospective design would provide stronger evidence, especially given the rarity of neurologic complications in transradial cerebral angiography. Second, the single-center nature of our study limits the generalizability of the findings. Although our center performs a high volume of transradial cerebral angiographies, which provided a substantial sample size, the results may not be fully applicable to other institutions with different patient populations and practices.

Third, the small sample size of neurologic complication cases and the imbalance between cases and controls are limitations. With only 19 cases compared with 1660 controls, the 1:4 case-control matching was used to reduce confounding. However, the small number of complication cases may have restricted the ability to detect subtle risk factors, lowering the statistical power.

Fourth, our antiplatelet protocol, which involved administration of preventive antiplatelet medication at the physician’s discretion potentially contributed to the study outcomes. Although our data indicate similar antiplatelet medication usage rates between groups with and without complications (57.89% versus 65.78%, P = .4714), this protocol may have influenced to the overall low incidence of neurologic complications observed in our study.

Additionally, our DWI protocol was only performed in symptomatic patients; thus, the true incidence of cerebral infarctions may have been underestimated, as asymptomatic lesions could have gone undetected. Last, the study focused mainly on acute complications and short-term outcomes, leaving the long-term effects of these complications unexplored.

Despite these limitations, our study provides important insights into the characteristics of neurologic complications in transradial cerebral angiography. The detailed analysis of clinical features and DWI patterns, combined with case-control matching, strengthens the validity of our findings. While this study did not include a comparison group of patients undergoing transfemoral diagnostic cerebral angiography, such analyses would undoubtedly provide valuable insights into the relative advantages and risks of the transradial approach.

Future large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are essential to confirm these results and improve patient safety in transradial cerebral angiography. Comparative analyses between transradial and transfemoral approaches would provide valuable insights into their relative advantages and technical nuances, ultimately contributing to advancing the safety and efficacy of cerebral angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Our large-scale retrospective analysis of transradial cerebral angiography demonstrates that neurologic complications were rare but tended to occur early, predominantly within the first 6 hours postprocedure. The observed ischemic patterns, notably the right-sided predominance, suggest embolic mechanisms as a potential etiology. Although no significant predictors of neurologic complications were identified, the complexity of these events, possibly influenced by procedural techniques and anatomic factors, warrants further investigation. Large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are essential to better elucidate risk factors and enhance patient safety in this increasingly utilized transradial approach.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ha Yan Kim from Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine for statistical analysis.

Footnotes

  • This research has been supported by the Catholic Medical Center Research Foundation made in the program year of 2022.

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Park JH,
    2. Kim DY,
    3. Kim JW, et al
    . Efficacy of transradial cerebral angiography in the elderly. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013;53:213–17 doi:10.3340/jkns.2013.53.4.213 pmid:23826476
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Patel P,
    2. Haussen DC,
    3. Nogueira RG, et al
    . The neuro radialist. Interv Cardiol Clin 2020;9:75–86 doi:10.1016/j.iccl.2019.08.008 pmid:31733743
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Stone JG,
    2. Zussman BM,
    3. Tonetti DA, et al
    . Transradial versus transfemoral approaches for diagnostic cerebral angiography: a prospective, single-center, non-inferiority comparative effectiveness study. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:993–98 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015642 pmid:31974282
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Shi M,
    2. He S
    . Transradial and transfemoral accesses for cerebral angiography: a retrospective comparative study. Neurol Res 2023;45:1063–68 doi:10.1080/01616412.2023.2257410 pmid:37751776
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Zhou WJ,
    2. Jin X,
    3. Xu C, et al
    . Trans-radial versus trans-femoral approach for cerebral angiography: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2023;18:235–43 doi:10.5114/wiitm.2022.123309 pmid:37680739
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jo KW,
    2. Park SM,
    3. Kim SD, et al
    . Is transradial cerebral angiography feasible and safe? A single center’s experience. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010;47:332–37 doi:10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.332 pmid:20539791
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tso MK,
    2. Rajah GB,
    3. Dossani RH, et al
    . Learning curves for transradial access versus transfemoral access in diagnostic cerebral angiography: a case series. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:174–78 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017460 pmid:34078647
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Almallouhi E,
    2. Al Kasab S,
    3. Sattur MG, et al
    . Incorporation of transradial approach in neuroendovascular procedures: defining benchmarks for rates of complications and conversion to femoral access. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:1122–26 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015893 pmid:32217626
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. von Elm E,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Egger M
    ; STROBE Initiative, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344–49 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 pmid:18313558
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Casserly IP,
    2. Sachar R,
    3. Yadav JS
    . Manual of Peripheral Vascular Intervention. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005
  11. 11.↵
    1. Weibel J,
    2. Fields WS
    . Tortuosity, coiling, and kinking of the internal carotid artery. I. etiology and radiographic anatomy. Neurology 1965;15:7–18 doi:10.1212/wnl.15.1.7 pmid:14257832
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Metz H,
    2. Bannister R,
    3. Murray-Leslie R, et al
    . Kinking of the internal carotid artery: in relation to cerebrovascular disease. Lancet 1961;1:424–26 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(61)90004-6 pmid:13769898
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Samuels OB,
    2. Joseph GJ,
    3. Lynn MJ, et al
    . A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:643–46
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Barnett HJM,
    2. Taylor DW,
    3. Haynes RB, et al
    ; North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53 doi:10.1056/NEJM199108153250701 pmid:1852179
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lee DH,
    2. Ahn JH,
    3. Jeong SS, et al
    . Routine transradial access for conventional cerebral angiography: a single operator’s experience of its feasibility and safety. Br J Radiol 2004;77:831–38 doi:10.1259/bjr/89933527 pmid:15482994
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Leffers AM,
    2. Wagner A
    . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiology 2000;41:204–10 doi:10.1080/028418500127345299 pmid:10866072
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kaufmann TJ,
    2. Huston J,
    3. Mandrekar JN, et al
    . Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:812–19 doi:10.1148/radiol.2433060536 pmid:17517935
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kosanke J,
    2. Bergstralh E
    . Match One or More Controls to Cases Using the GREEDY Algorithm. Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; 2004.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Shaban S,
    2. Huasen B,
    3. Haridas A, et al
    . Digital subtraction angiography in cerebrovascular disease: current practice and perspectives on diagnosis, acute treatment and prognosis. Acta Neurol Belg 2022;122:763–80 doi:10.1007/s13760-021-01805-z pmid:34553337
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fifi JT,
    2. Meyers PM,
    3. Lavine SD, et al
    . Complications of modern diagnostic cerebral angiography in an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:442–47 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.01.012 pmid:19246211
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Tafelmeier S,
    2. Kesseler E,
    3. Iancu AM, et al
    . Spectrum of complications and complication rates after diagnostic catheter angiography in neuroradiology. Clin Neuroradiol 2023;33:763–68 doi:10.1007/s00062-023-01273-3 pmid:36894748
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Thiex R,
    2. Norbash AM,
    3. Frerichs KU
    . The safety of dedicated-team catheter-based diagnostic cerebral angiography in the era of advanced noninvasive imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:230–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1803 pmid:19779004
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Willinsky RA,
    2. Taylor SM,
    3. TerBrugge K, et al
    . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2272012071 pmid:12637677
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Shen J,
    2. Karki M,
    3. Jiang T, et al
    . Complications associated with diagnostic cerebral angiography: a retrospective analysis of 644 consecutive cerebral angiographic cases. Neurol India 2018;66:1154–58 doi:10.4103/0028-3886.237018 pmid:30038108
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Dawkins AA,
    2. Evans AL,
    3. Wattam J, et al
    . Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology 2007;49:753–59 doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0252-y pmid:17594083
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ge B,
    2. Wei Y
    . Comparison of transfemoral cerebral angiography and transradial cerebral angiography following a shift in practice during four years at a single center in China. Med Sci Monit 2020;26:e921631 doi:10.12659/MSM.921631 pmid:32210222
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Carraro do Nascimento V,
    2. de Villiers L,
    3. Hughes I, et al
    . Transradial versus transfemoral arterial approach for cerebral angiography and the frequency of embolic events on diffusion weighted MRI. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:723–27 doi:10.1136/jnis-2022-019009 pmid:35868855
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Keeley EC,
    2. Grines CL
    . Scraping of aortic debris by coronary guiding catheters: a prospective evaluation of 1,000 cases. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1861–65 doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00497-5 pmid:9857864
    FREE Full Text
  • Received October 22, 2024.
  • Accepted after revision December 4, 2024.
  • © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comprehensive Analysis of Neurologic Complications following Transradial Cerebral Angiography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Hoon Kim, Hyeong Jin Lee, Seon Woong Choi, Sunghan Kim, Seong-Rim Kim, Ik Seong Park
Comprehensive Analysis of Neurologic Complications following Transradial Cerebral Angiography
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8625

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Neurologic Complication in Transradial Angiography
Hoon Kim, Hyeong Jin Lee, Seon Woong Choi, Sunghan Kim, Seong-Rim Kim, Ik Seong Park
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8625
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Rescue Reentry in Carotid Near-Occlusion
  • Contour Neurovascular System: Five Year Follow Up
  • Effect of SARS-CoV2 on Endovascular Thrombectomy
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire