Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Prepontine Cistern Filling Independently Predicts Poor Neurologic Outcomes in Ruptured PICA Aneurysms

Etienne Lefevre, Paul Brugerolles, Kévin Premat, Stéphanie Lenck, Eimad Shotar, Alice Jacquens, Vincent Degos, Anne Laure Boch, Alexandre Carpentier, Frédéric Clarencon and Aurélien Nouet
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8615
Etienne Lefevre
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (E.L., P.B., A.L.B., A.C., A.N.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
bSorbonne Université (E.L., S.L., A.J., V.D., F.C.), UPMC, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Etienne Lefevre
Paul Brugerolles
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (E.L., P.B., A.L.B., A.C., A.N.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kévin Premat
cDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology (K.P., S.L., E.S., F.C.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stéphanie Lenck
bSorbonne Université (E.L., S.L., A.J., V.D., F.C.), UPMC, Paris, France
cDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology (K.P., S.L., E.S., F.C.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eimad Shotar
cDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology (K.P., S.L., E.S., F.C.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alice Jacquens
bSorbonne Université (E.L., S.L., A.J., V.D., F.C.), UPMC, Paris, France
dDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (A.J., V.D.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Degos
bSorbonne Université (E.L., S.L., A.J., V.D., F.C.), UPMC, Paris, France
dDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (A.J., V.D.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Laure Boch
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (E.L., P.B., A.L.B., A.C., A.N.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anne Laure Boch
Alexandre Carpentier
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (E.L., P.B., A.L.B., A.C., A.N.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frédéric Clarencon
bSorbonne Université (E.L., S.L., A.J., V.D., F.C.), UPMC, Paris, France
cDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology (K.P., S.L., E.S., F.C.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aurélien Nouet
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (E.L., P.B., A.L.B., A.C., A.N.), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aurélien Nouet
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ruptured PICA aneurysms present considerable treatment challenges due to their rarity and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. This study aims to report and critically analyze the long-term neurologic outcomes of patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms treated at our tertiary center and to evaluate the prognostic value of prepontine cistern filling grade on initial CT scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and radiologic data were retrospectively collected for consecutive patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms treated at our institution between January 2010 and December 2021. The prepontine cistern filling was graded from 0–3 on sagittal slices of the initial CT scan by 2 independent readers.

RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms were included. The mean aneurysm diameter was 7.2 mm (SD ± 4.9), with a mean radiologic follow-up of 40.2 months (SD ± 45.2). Endovascular treatment was the primary technique (96.5%), with a small number (3.5%) requiring microsurgical clipping. Parent vessel sacrifice was performed in 49% of cases. Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 79% of patients, with a recurrence rate of 19%. External ventricular drainage was necessary in 83% of patients, and 28% later required a permanent ventricular shunt. Symptomatic vasospasm occurred in 37% of patients. The in-hospital mortality rate was 11%, and 55% of survivors required a transient tracheostomy. At 1-year posthemorrhage, 60% had a good neurologic outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed that poor neurologic outcomes were significantly associated with higher grade of prepontine cistern filling (P < .05) and in those whose parent vessel had to be sacrificed (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Ruptured PICA aneurysms carry a grim prognosis and pose major management challenges. Both the grade of prepontine cistern filling on initial CT scan and the need for parent vessel sacrifice are important prognostic factors.

ABBREVIATIONS:

GCS
Glasgow Coma Scale
IQR
interquartile range
WFNS
World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies

SUMMARY

PREVIOUS LITERATURE:

Ruptured PICA aneurysms are rare and present considerable treatment challenges due to their anatomic complexity and high prevalence of fusiform shapes. Consequently, patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms generally have poorer prognosis compared with those with aneurysms located elsewhere. Although previous studies have identified predictive factors for poor neurologic outcomes in subarachnoid hemorrhage, the specific locoregional challenges associated with PICA aneurysms necessitate further investigation into particular predictive factors. These patients are at an elevated risk of brainstem compression, which may not be detected through standard supratentorial monitoring of intracranial pressure.

KEY FINDINGS:

Our retrospective monocentric study identified the grade of prepontine cistern blood filling as a strong and independent predictive factor of poor neurologic outcome in patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms. This underscores the importance of accurately assessing brainstem compression, which is related to the available space in the posterior fossa for this subgroup of patients.

KNOWLEDGE ADVANCEMENT:

We developed a prognostic classification for patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms, based on a simple grading system for prepontine cistern blood filling. This system independently predicts neurologic outcomes, providing valuable guidance for clinicians managing these complex cases.

PICA aneurysms account for approximately 0.5%–3% of all intracranial aneurysms.1,2 Patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms experience worse outcomes compared with those with ruptured aneurysms in other locations, irrespective of their Fisher grade, Hunt and Hess grade, or vasospasm rate at admission.3 The high incidence of poor neurologic outcomes in these patients is likely multifactorial, involving factors such as the higher prevalence of fusiform aneurysms, the proximity of these aneurysms to the brainstem and lower cranial nerves, and the presence of large infratentorial cisternal clots.3⇓-5 Despite advances in both endovascular and microsurgical techniques, treating these rare aneurysms remains a major challenge.3,5 Furthermore, the standardized clinical management of severe SAH is often limited to invasive intracranial pressure monitoring in the supratentorial compartment, despite well-documented differences in pressure between supra- and infratentorial compartments.6 Prognosis classifications for SAH primarily focus on anterior circulation aneurysms, highlighting the need for more robust and specific prognostic indicators for posterior circulation aneurysms. The presence of blood in the subarachnoid cisterns of the posterior fossa has been identified as a prognostic factor in traumatic brain injuries and SAH, potentially contributing to subsequent vasospasm.7 However, despite the frequent observation of blood in the prepontine cistern following ruptures of PICA aneurysms, its prognostic significance for neurologic outcomes has not been documented so far. Importantly, in the context of posterior fossa SAH, the prepontine cistern plays a crucial role in allowing anterior displacement of the brainstem by the compressive clot. Should this space become filled or obliterated, there is a substantial risk of severe brainstem compression.

This study aims to report the long-term neurologic outcomes of patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms and to evaluate the prognostic value of prepontine cistern filling in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Approval for this study was obtained from the institutional ethics board (IRB #00011687: 2024/17). In accordance with local regulations, patient consent was waived for this retrospective analysis of anonymized data. The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Data Collection

This monocentric retrospective study was conducted according with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.8 All consecutive adult patients referred to our tertiary center for a ruptured PICA aneurysm between January 2010 and December 2021 were retrospectively identified and included. Inclusion criteria were: patients aged ≥18 who presented with SAH associated with a ruptured PICA aneurysm. Exclusion criteria included patients with other potential causes for SAH, such as a concomitant arteriovenous shunt or recent head trauma, to avoid potential confounding factors. Clinical data were retrospectively collected through medical chart review. Functional neurologic status was evaluated by using the mRS at baseline and 1 year postrupture.9 The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) scale were used to assess clinical status on the day of rupture.10,11 Variables such as sex, age, clinical status on admission, and vascular comorbidities such as blood hypertension, history of stroke, or diabetes were recorded.

Radiologic Assessment

The severity of intracranial bleeding on the initial CT scan was assessed by 2 experienced physicians in cerebrovascular diseases; 1 interventional neuroradiologist (K.P.) and 1 neurosurgeon (E.L.), with 7 and 6 years of experience in brain aneurysm management, respectively. The readers evaluated the following criteria: exact location of the aneurysm on the segments of the PICA (Fig 1), Fisher grade, presence of blood in the fourth ventricle, intracerebellar hemorrhage, blood filling of the cisterna magna, the fusiform or saccular shape of the aneurysm, and the prepontine cistern filling grade. The prepontine cistern filling grade was assessed on the initial CT scan on a sagittal slice as follows: grade 0 when the prepontine cistern was entirely free and only filled with CSF; grade 1 when it was partially filled with blood but some CSF remained visible; grade 2 when the prepontine cistern was entirely filled with blood and no CSF was visible; and grade 3 when the protuberance was directly in contact with the clivus (Fig 2). Discrepancies between raters were resolved by consensus through concomitant review of the CT scan.12

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Segments of the PICA. A, Illustration of the lateral view of the brainstem and cerebellum, highlighting the different segments of the PICA and its proximal segments’ close relationship with the lower cranial nerves. B, Graphic representation of good neurologic outcomes based on the location of the aneurysm along the PICA. Ant. = anterior; Lat. = lateral; Med. = medullary; Tel.Vel. = telo-velar; Tons. = tonsillar.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Classification of prepontine cistern filling, with graphic illustrations and examples of sagittal CT scans. Grade 0: The prepontine cistern is entirely filled with CSF, indicating no blood presence. Grade 1: The prepontine cistern is partially filled with blood but still contains CSF. Grade 2: The prepontine cistern is completely filled with blood, leaving no visible CSF. Grade 3: The prepontine cistern is not visible, indicating the brainstem is in direct contact with the clivus, representing severe hemorrhagic impact and brainstem compression.

Statistical Analysis

Data are reported as mean ± SD for continuous variables and median (interquartile ranges [IQRs]) for noncontinuous variables. Interrater reliability between 2 raters (K.P. and E.L.) for the prepontine cistern filling grade was assessed by using Cohen κ coefficient, with a k index ≤ 0.40 indicating poor agreement, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good, and 0.81–1 excellent.13 Univariate analyses and graphical representations were conducted with Prism (Version 9.0.0, GraphPad Software). Group comparisons were made by using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher exact test for binomial variables. Additional analyses were performed by using R (Version 4.3.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing) through the RStudio interface (Version 2022.07.2 + 576, RStudio, PBC). Data were examined to ensure no violation of the assumptions for logistic regression. A multivariate logistic regression model assessed the association between the presence of CSF in the prepontine cistern and poor neurologic outcome, adjusting for known predictors such as WFNS scale and parent vessel sacrifice. ORs, 95% CIs, and P values were derived to assess the strength and significance of associations. All tests were 2-sided, and P value of < .05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Study Population

Fifty-seven patients with SAH from ruptured PICA aneurysms were included, with a female-to-male ratio of 2:1 and a median age of 52 years (IQR 44–64). Vascular comorbidities were present in 27 patients (47%), and 7 patients (12%) were on antithrombotic therapies before the rupture. All patients were independent at baseline (mRS ≤2): 53 patients (93%) were asymptomatic (mRS = 0), 3 (5.3%) had mild symptoms (mRS = 1), and 1 (1.7%) had slight disability (mRS = 2). The GCS scores were 15 in 18 patients (31.6%), 13–14 in 8 patients (14%), 7–12 in 12 patients (21%), and 3–6 in 19 patients (33%). WFNS grades were: 1 in 18 patients (32%), 2 in 7 (12%), 3 in 1 (1.7%), 4 in 4 (7%), and grade 5 in 19 (33%). Fisher grades were: 1 in 2 patients (3.5%), 2 in 1 (1.7%), and 4 in 54 (95%). Blood in the fourth ventricle was seen in 51 patients (90%), intracerebral hemorrhage in 9 (16%), and associated hydrocephalus requiring external drainage in 47 (83%). Prepontine cistern filling was graded as 0 in 5 patients (8.8%), 1 in 28 patients (49%), 2 in 14 patients (25%), and 3 in 10 patients (18%). The calculated Cohen κ coefficient was 0.819, indicating excellent interrater reliability (P < .05). The characteristics and outcomes of patients in each prepontine cistern filling grade are summarized in Table 1. Nine patients had additional aneurysms. Aneurysms were located on the left PICA in 33 cases (58%) and were fusiform in 33 cases (58%) and saccular in 24 cases (42%). Thirty-three aneurysms (58%) were located on the left PICA and were distributed as follows: 32 aneurysms (56%) were located on the anterior medullary segment with 31.3% of them being fusiform, 9 aneurysms (16%) were located on the lateral medullary segment with 88.9% of them being fusiform, 5 aneurysms (8.8%) were located on the tonsillar medullary segment and were all fusiform (100%), 10 aneurysms (18%) were located on the telo-velar tonsillary segment and were all fusiform (100%), and 1 aneurysm (1.8%) was cortical and fusiform (Fig 1). The mean maximal diameter was 7.2 mm (±4.9). The median time from symptom onset to treatment was 22 hours (IQR 14–47), with 8 patients (14%) experiencing rebleeding before aneurysm exclusion. Fifty-five patients (97%) received endovascular treatment, while 2 patients (3.5%) underwent microsurgical clipping. Endovascular procedures included simple coiling in 28 cases (49%), parent vessel sacrifice by n-butyl cyanoacrylic glue (Glubran) in 15 cases (26%) or simple coiling in 11 cases (19%), and flow-diversion stent placement in 1 case (1.8%). Parent vessel sacrifice was necessary in 28 patients (49%), varying by aneurysm location: 22% in patients with anterior medullary segment aneurysm, 89% in those with lateral medullary segment aneurysm, 80% each in patients with tonsillar medullary segment and telo-velar tonsillar segment aneurysm, and 100% in those with cortical aneurysm. Parent vessel sacrifice was more common in fusiform than saccular aneurysms (77% versus 8.7%; P < .001). There was no statistically significant change in the frequency of parent vessel sacrifice over the duration of the study (P = .36). The characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without parent vessel sacrifice are summarized in Table 2. Four patients (7%) required posterior fossa craniectomy, with 2 also needing intracerebellar hematoma evacuation, on average 15.3 hours (SD ± 8.3) postsymptom onset.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Characteristics of the study population based on the prepontine cistern filling grade

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Characteristics of the study population based on the parent vessel status

Outcomes

Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 45 patients (79%) after the initial procedure. At last follow-up, 11 patients (19%) experienced aneurysm recurrence, with 5 requiring a second treatment. The final occlusion rate was 76%. Symptomatic vasospasm requiring active medical or endovascular treatment occurred in 21 patients (37%). An external ventricular drain was placed in 47 patients (83%), and 16 patients (28%) required further internal ventricular shunt surgery. The median hospital length of stay was 29 days (IQR 19–48.5). The mean follow-up was 40.2 months (SD ± 45.2), with an in-hospital mortality rate of 11%. Among survivors, 28 patients (55%) required transient tracheostomy. One year posthemorrhage, 34 patients (60%) had good neurologic outcomes, with only 7 (14%) having persistent lower cranial nerve palsy.

Prognosis Factors

One year posthemorrhage, poor neurologic outcomes varied with prepontine cistern filling grades: 10% in grade 0, 29% in grade 1, 46% in grade 2, and 100% in grade 3 (Fig 2). Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between prepontine cistern filling grade avec poor neurologic outcomes at 1 year (P < .05; Table 3 and 4). Patients who underwent parent vessel sacrifice exhibited worse neurologic outcomes compared with those who did not (61% versus 21%; P < .05). Higher WFNS grades were also associated with poorer neurologic outcomes compared with those with lower grades (P < .05). There was no significant difference in outcomes based on Fisher grades (P = .78), the need for external ventricular drain (P = .28), or aneurysm type (fusiform versus saccular; P = .13). Aneurysm location on PICA segments did not predict outcomes (Fig 1B), though there was a trend toward better outcomes in patients with anterior medullary segment aneurysms (P = .08).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Univariate analysis of suspected predicting factors for good neurologic outcomes at 1 year

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4:

Multivariate analysis of suspected predicting factors for good neurologic outcomes at 1 year

Variables for the multivariate logistic regression model were selected based on their association with clinical outcomes identified through univariate analysis. The final model incorporated the WFNS grade, the prepontine cistern filling grade and parent vessel sacrifice as predictors of outcomes. Among these, the prepontine cistern filling grade (OR 3.13; 95% CI, 1.3–9.1; P = .02) and parent vessel sacrifice (OR 5.3; 95% CI, 1.39–23.02; P = .02) were independently associated with poor neurologic outcome. These findings are summarized in Table 3 and 4 and Fig 3.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Graphic representation of neurologic outcomes based on the necessity of sacrificing the parent vessel or not, the presence of hydrocephalus requiring external ventricular drainage or not, and the shape of the aneurysm after univariate analysis. PV = parent vessel; **P < .01).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we report acceptable outcomes in patients treated for ruptured PICA aneurysm and identify predictive factors for subsequent neurologic outcomes.

Challenges in Prognosis

Although they represent only 0.5%–5% of all ruptured intracranial aneurysms, ruptured PICA aneurysms pose major treatment challenges.3,5,14 Their proximity to the brainstem and lower cranial nerves contributes to higher rates of poor neurologic outcomes compared with other intracranial aneurysms, despite similar grades of initial hemorrhage severity.3,14⇓⇓⇓-18 Additionally, the diverse locations of these aneurysms along the PICA leads to varying degrees of lower cranial nerve dysfunction and/or the need for tracheostomy, further complicating treatment strategies.3,15 Moreover, fusiform morphology, which is more common in PICA aneurysms, adds complexity to treatment.3,15,16,18 Furthermore, large clots within the posterior fossa can compress the brainstem, exacerbating the grim prognosis of these patients.

Treatment Modalities

Direct surgical manipulation of the lower cranial nerves to adequately expose and clip PICA aneurysms has repeatedly been implicated as the main cause for high rates of lower cranial nerve dysfunction in these patients.3,19,20 However, the predominance of endovascular treatment in our series, coupled with a substantial incidence of transient tracheostomies (55%), questions whether surgical intervention is the primary cause of this dysfunction. Presently, both endovascular and microsurgical treatments have demonstrated comparable outcomes, without strong evidence favoring one over the other (Supplemental Data).3,5,16,18,20 Yet the rarity of PICA aneurysms makes it difficult to conduct randomized trials to definitively compare these modalities.

In case of Fisher grade 4 subarachnoid hemorrhage that required the placement of an external ventricular drain, stent placement was intentionally avoided to minimize the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with antiplatelet therapy. Consequently, simple coiling was prioritized whenever feasible, with parent vessel sacrifice reserved for instances where vessel preservation was not possible, particularly in the case of fusiform aneurysms. Detailed anatomic considerations that influenced the decision to preserve or sacrifice the parent artery in each case are summarized in the Supplemental Data.

Prognostic Factors

The severity of bleeding, clinically assessed by the WFNS scale, correlates with subsequent neurologic outcome.5,17,20,21 Starnoni et al5 observed no significant influence of aneurysm morphology (fusiform versus saccular) on neurologic outcome. In our series, while a trend toward worse outcomes with fusiform aneurysms was observed, it did not reach statistical significance (P = .08). Similarly, Sejkorova et al17 reported no discernible difference in neurologic outcomes between proximal and distal PICA aneurysms.

Our findings also revealed that fusiform aneurysms were more likely to necessitate parent vessel sacrifice (P < .001). In our series, parent vessel sacrifice was associated with poorer outcomes (P < .05).

However, despite variable distribution of fusiform-shaped aneurysms along the PICA, long-term neurologic outcomes did not significantly correlate with the location of the aneurysm. Nevertheless, there was a trend suggesting better outcomes in patients with aneurysms located in the anterior medullary segment compared with those with more distal aneurysms (P = .08). Indeed, proximal PICA aneurysms may pose a higher risk of neurologic damage due to their close proximity to lower cranial nerves and the presence of vital brainstem perforators, which precludes safe parent vessel sacrifice. Conversely, it is noteworthy that 64% of proximal aneurysms were saccular, in contrast to only 4% of more distal aneurysms. Consequently, anterior medullary segment PICA aneurysms necessitated parent vessel sacrifice in merely 22% of cases, compared with 84% in more distal locations. This likely accounts for their similar outcomes to distal aneurysms, despite their deep and anatomically challenging intracranial location.

Additionally, while not previously highlighted as a prognostic factor, our series suggests that sacrificing the parent vessel may be associated with poorer outcomes (P < .05).3,5 The high rate of parent vessel sacrifice in our series (49%) and its strong association with subsequent poor neurologic outcomes raise questions about the feasibility of performing a surgical bypass to avoid deliberate endovascular occlusion of the damaged artery in these cases. In light of these results, and with the goal of improving patient’s outcomes, practices may need to shift toward higher rates of parent vessel preservation.

Prepontine Cistern Filling as a Prognostic Indicator

Our multivariate analysis identified a strong association between the filling of the prepontine cistern and poor neurologic outcomes (P < .05). In cases of severe intracranial hemorrhage, monitoring of intracranial pressure is routinely conducted in the supratentorial compartment.22 However, despite the recognized importance of brainstem compression in posterior fossa hemorrhage, infratentorial pressure monitoring remains underutilized.6 The presence of a thick and diffuse cisternal clot has been previously identified as an independent predictor of vasospasm-related morbidity and poor outcomes after SAH.7

The presence of prepontine CSF may indicate available space in the posterior fossa, while its absence suggests brainstem compression. Prepontine CSF may reflect loco-regional intracranial pressure and the potential for anterior displacement of the brainstem by large posterior compressive clots. Conversely, its absence, whether due to being filled with blood or compressed against the clivus, reflects a lack of space in the posterior fossa and an increased risk of further brainstem compression. These findings underscore the critical need to identify additional predictors of poor neurologic outcomes in this patient population.

Relevance and Limitations of the Study

This study presents a substantial series of patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms treated primarily with endovascular techniques, achieving acceptable outcomes. It is the first to suggest an association between persistent prepontine CSF and favorable neurologic outcomes in this context. However, the retrospective design and limited sample size restrict definitive conclusions, underscoring the necessity for further prospective studies. Additionally, the high rate of parent vessel sacrifice likely contributes to poor neurologic outcomes, although these are comparable to existing literature. The lack of multicollinearity between prepontine cistern filling and parent vessel sacrifice strengthens the multivariate analysis results. Additionally, while MRI could offer valuable insight into parenchymal damages related to prepontine CSF absence, it was not systematically available in this retrospective study as it was reserved for severe cases with delayed awakening. In the acute phase, CT remains the primary technique, and despite its lower sensitivity compared with MRI, CT grading is likely more practical and widely applicable in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ruptured PICA aneurysms present major challenges due to their rarity and intricate nature. Their close anatomic proximity with vital structures such as the lower cranial nerves and the brainstem, the high prevalence of fusiform dissecting aneurysms, and the subsequent frequent need for parent vessel sacrifices contribute to considerable morbidity following both surgical and endovascular treatments. Our study identifies prepontine cistern filling as a key prognostic indicator of neurologic outcomes. Additionally, the requirement for sacrificing the parent vessel emerges as a factor contributing to poorer neurologic prognoses. These findings highlight the importance of advancing our understanding of PICA aneurysms to refine treatment approaches and enhance patient care.

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere thanks to Hugues Pellerin for his valuable assistance in double-checking the statistical analysis of this article. His expertise ensured the accuracy and reliability of our results, contributing to the quality of our work.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hudgins RJ,
    2. Day AL,
    3. Quisling RG, et al
    . Aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. A clinical and anatomical analysis. J Neurosurg 1983;58:381–87 doi:10.3171/jns.1983.58.3.0381 pmid:6827323
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lewis SB,
    2. Chang DJ,
    3. Peace DA, et al
    . Distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: clinical features and management. J Neurosurg 2002;97:756–66 doi:10.3171/jns.2002.97.4.0756 pmid:12405360
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Williamson RW,
    2. Wilson DA,
    3. Abla AA, et al
    . Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes in patients with ruptured posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: a comparative analysis. J Neurosurg 2015;123:441–45 doi:10.3171/2014.10.JNS141079 pmid:25884260
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Peluso JP,
    2. Rooij WJ,
    3. van Sluzewski M, et al
    . Posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome of endovascular treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:86–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0758 pmid:17928380
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Starnoni D,
    2. Maduri R,
    3. Al Taha K, et al
    ; Swiss SOS Group. Ruptured PICA aneurysms: presentation and treatment outcomes compared to other posterior circulation aneurysms. A Swiss SOS study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2019;161:1325–34 doi:10.1007/s00701-019-03894-5 pmid:31025178
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Won SY,
    2. Dubinski D,
    3. Hagemeier J, et al
    . Intracranial pressure monitoring in posterior fossa lesions—systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45:1933–39 doi:10.1007/s10143-022-01746-y
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Aldrich EF,
    2. Higashida R,
    3. Hmissi A, et al
    . Thick and diffuse cisternal clot independently predicts vasospasm-related morbidity and poor outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2021;134:1553–61 doi:10.3171/2020.3.JNS193400 pmid:32442971
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. von Elm E,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Egger M, et al
    ; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344–49 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 pmid:18313558
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Broderick JP,
    2. Adeoye O,
    3. Elm J
    . Evolution of the modified Rankin scale and its use in future stroke trials. Stroke 2017;48:2007–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017866 pmid:28626052
    FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jennett B,
    2. Bond M
    . Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975;1:480–84 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92830-5 pmid:46957
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Teasdale G,
    2. Jennett B
    . Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–84 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 pmid:4136544
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fisher CM,
    2. Kistler JP,
    3. Davis JM
    . Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 1980;6:1–9 doi:10.1227/00006123-198001000-00001 pmid:7354892
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG
    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.2307/2529310
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ali ZS,
    2. Lang SS,
    3. Kamat AR, et al
    . Suprasellar pediatric craniopharyngioma resection via endonasal endoscopic approach. Childs Nerv Syst 2013;29:2065–70 doi:10.1007/s00381-013-2153-1 pmid:23702738
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Bohnstedt BN,
    2. Ziemba-Davis M,
    3. Edwards G, et al
    . Treatment and outcomes among 102 posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: a comparison of endovascular and microsurgical clip ligation. World Neurosurg 2015;83:784–93 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.035 pmid:25541085
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kanemoto Y,
    2. Michiwaki Y,
    3. Maeda K, et al
    . Multidisciplinary treatments of true posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: single-center retrospective study and treatment algorithm. World Neurosurg 2020;139:e45–51 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.037 pmid:32194274
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sejkorová A,
    2. Petr O,
    3. Mulino M, et al
    . Management of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: what factors play the most important role in outcome? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017;159:549–58 doi:10.1007/s00701-016-3058-z pmid:28066873
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lehto H,
    2. Harati A,
    3. Niemelä M, et al
    . Distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: clinical features and outcome of 80 patients. World Neurosurg 2014;82:702–13 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.012 pmid:24937594
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Mukonoweshuro W,
    2. Laitt RD,
    3. Hughes DG
    . Endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2003;45:188–92 doi:10.1007/s00234-002-0913-9 pmid:12684724
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Jabbour P,
    3. Starke RM, et al
    . Endovascular treatment of proximal and distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2013;118:991–99 doi:10.3171/2012.12.JNS121240 pmid:23350778
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Urasyanandana K,
    2. Withayasuk P,
    3. Songsaeng D, et al
    . Ruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: An evaluation of prognostic factors of treatment outcome. Interv Neuroradiol 2017;23:240–48 doi:10.1177/1591019917691252 pmid:28133987
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Robba C,
    2. Graziano F,
    3. Rebora P, et al
    ; SYNAPSE-ICU Investigators. Intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with acute brain injury in the intensive care unit (SYNAPSE-ICU): an international, prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2021;20:548–58 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00138-1 pmid:34146513
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received August 28, 2024.
  • Accepted after revision October 20, 2024.
  • © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prepontine Cistern Filling Independently Predicts Poor Neurologic Outcomes in Ruptured PICA Aneurysms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Etienne Lefevre, Paul Brugerolles, Kévin Premat, Stéphanie Lenck, Eimad Shotar, Alice Jacquens, Vincent Degos, Anne Laure Boch, Alexandre Carpentier, Frédéric Clarencon, Aurélien Nouet
Prepontine Cistern Filling Independently Predicts Poor Neurologic Outcomes in Ruptured PICA Aneurysms
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8615

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Prepontine Cistern Filling Predicts Stroke Outcome
Etienne Lefevre, Paul Brugerolles, Kévin Premat, Stéphanie Lenck, Eimad Shotar, Alice Jacquens, Vincent Degos, Anne Laure Boch, Alexandre Carpentier, Frédéric Clarencon, Aurélien Nouet
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8615
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Rescue Reentry in Carotid Near-Occlusion
  • Contour Neurovascular System: Five Year Follow Up
  • Effect of SARS-CoV2 on Endovascular Thrombectomy
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire