Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN TUMOR IMAGING

Noncontrast MRI Surveillance of Craniopharyngiomas Using a Balanced Steady-state Free Precession (bSSFP) Sequence

Kelly Trinh, Michael Tang, Claire White-Dzuro, Min Lang, Karen Buch and Sandra Rincon
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8439
Kelly Trinh
aFrom the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (K.T.), Lubbock, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Tang
bSchool of Public Health (M.T.), Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire White-Dzuro
cVanderbilt University School of Medicine (C.W.-D.), Nashville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Min Lang
dHarvard Medical School (M.L., K.B., S.R.), Boston, Massachusetts
eMassachusetts General Hospital (M.L., K.B., S.R.), Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Min Lang
Karen Buch
dHarvard Medical School (M.L., K.B., S.R.), Boston, Massachusetts
eMassachusetts General Hospital (M.L., K.B., S.R.), Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karen Buch
Sandra Rincon
dHarvard Medical School (M.L., K.B., S.R.), Boston, Massachusetts
eMassachusetts General Hospital (M.L., K.B., S.R.), Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sandra Rincon
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced MRI (CEMRI) is a commonly used imaging technique for craniopharyngioma surveillance; however, it carries risks such as allergic reaction and gadolinium deposition. This study evaluates the efficacy of non contrast–enhanced MRI (NCMRI) with a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence compared with CEMRI T1-weighted imaging for craniopharyngioma surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with craniopharyngioma (16 females/13 males, mean age =21.5 ± 4.3 years) with CEMRIs, including a bSSFP sequence, were evaluated. For each patient, 2 blinded neuroradiologists compared the dimensions of residual craniopharyngioma on non-contrast– and contrast-enhanced sequences. Tumor volume and solid/cystic component measurements were evaluated by using paired t-tests. Diagnostic confidence levels for non-contrast– and contrast-enhanced evaluations were measured by using a 3-point scale (2 = confident, 1 = adequate, 0 = unsure). Analyses of tumor involvement of cranial nerves (CNs) and adjacent vasculature and diagnostic confidence were performed by using Fisher exact and chi-square tests.

RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between residual tumor volumes in both studies (18.86 ± 21.67 cm3 versus 17.64 ± 23.85 cm3, P = .55) and measurements of dominant solid component volume, number of cystic components, and largest cystic component volume (2.71 ± 3.47 cm3 versus 3.95 ± 5.51 cm3, P = .10; 2.5 ± 1.5 versus 2.9 ± 1.5, P = .10; 7.61 ± 13.41 versus 6.84 ± 13.37 cm3, P = .22, respectively). Tumor involvement of CNs II (P = .64), III (P = .42), and adjacent vasculature (P = .05) showed no significant differences in detection. Diagnostic confidence was comparable in evaluating CN II, vascular structures, and third ventricle (P > .05) involvement. Higher levels of confidence were observed with bSSFP sequences for the detection of CN III involvement (P = .0001) and with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging for cavernous sinus involvement (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS: NCMRI techniques by using a bSSFP sequence provide similar characterization of craniopharyngiomas as contrast-enhanced techniques.

ABBREVIATIONS:

ACA
anterior cerebral artery
bSSFP
balanced steady-state free precession
CEMRI
contrast-enhanced MRI
ce-T1W
contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging
CN
cranial nerve
NCMRI
non-contrast–enhanced MRI
TR
total resection

SUMMARY

PREVIOUS LITERATURE:

Craniopharyngiomas are rare, benign brain tumors accounting for 1%-3% of all brain neoplasms. CEMRI is the standard imaging protocol for detecting and monitoring the tumor. Posttreatment, patients undergo frequent ce-T1W for tumor surveillance. Repeated exposure to gadolinium-based contrast can risk accumulation of free gadolinium in the brain parenchyma, which may have an impact on patients’ neurologic function. The use of a bSSFP sequence has shown promise as an alternative to standard brain tumor surveillance. To date, our study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of bSSFP in craniopharyngioma surveillance in comparison to the conventional ce-T1W.

KEY FINDINGS:

Our study found that the bSSFP sequence performed comparably to ce-T1W for assessing the presence of residual craniopharyngioma and for its involvement of surrounding structures. Similar diagnostic confidence was reported between the 2 sequences. bSSFP also provided higher diagnostic confidence for tumor involvement of CN III.

KNOWLEDGE ADVANCEMENT:

Our study suggests that bSSFP can serve as an alternative for craniopharyngioma surveillance because of its high diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and lack of gadolinium exposure. The sequence can be especially useful for monitoring craniopharyngioma in pediatric patients and patients with impaired renal function.

Craniopharyngiomas are rare, benign brain neoplasms that account for approximately 1%–3% of all brain tumors.1 They originate from residual embryonic tissue within the squamous epithelium of the primitive pharynx and are typically found in the sella and suprasellar regions of the brain.2 Contrast-enhanced MRI (CEMRI) is the standard protocol for imaging craniopharyngiomas at both baseline detection and for continued surveillance both during and after treatment.3 As such, patients with craniopharyngiomas undergo frequent contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (ce-T1W). The current protocol for imaging surveillance following the initiation of radiation therapy is a CEMRI every 3 months for the first year, followed by intervals of every 4–6 months up to 2 years, transitioning to annual scans thereafter.4

Recent studies have shown that free gadolinium can accumulate in the brain parenchyma, raising concerns about the safety of recurrent contrast use.5,6 These findings have prompted health care professionals to exercise increased caution when ordering contrasted studies, particularly since the long-term impact of gadolinium deposition remains unknown. This is especially relevant for pediatric patients who undergo repeated exposure to contrast for tumor surveillance.7

MR cisternographic imaging has emerged as an alternative approach for brain tumor surveillance. A balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence (also known as CISS, FIESTA, or 3D driven equilibrium) is a heavily fluid-weighted sequence with high spatial resolution that has been shown to be effective in evaluating cranial nerves (CNs) and cisterns.8,9 Previous work has demonstrated the effectiveness of bSSFP for evaluation and surveillance of various brain tumor types in comparison to conventional contrast-enhanced MRI.9⇓–11 A notable advantage of the bSSFP protocol is its independence from gadolinium-based contrast, thereby eliminating the risk of contrast deposition and making it more suitable for long-term surveillance.

In this study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of a non-contrast–enhanced MRI (NCMRI) protocol utilizing the bSSFP sequence for craniopharyngioma surveillance in comparison to conventional CEMRI examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient Cohort

This was a retrospective study performed at a single institution that was approved by the Institutional Review Board and was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. A total of 29 patients who had a pathology-proven sellar/suprasellar craniopharyngioma that underwent primary surgical resection between 2008 and 2018 were included in the study. Each patient underwent brain MRI examination with both bSSFP and conventional ce-T1W sequences between 3 to 6 months after surgery.

MRI Protocol

All patients underwent the same MRI protocol, consisting of axial T2-weighted imaging, axial FLAIR, axial susceptibility-weighted imaging, axial DWI (including ADC reconstruction from the DWI), precontrast T1-weighted imaging, ce-T1W, and bSSFP. All brain MR examinations were performed on 3T scanners at our institution (Magnetom Prisma Fit and Magnetom Skyra, Siemens Healthineers).

The ce-T1W and bSSFP sequences were used for image evaluation. The parameters of these sequences are as follows: ce-T1W – TR 14.764 ms, TE 6.364 ms, flip angle 13°, NEX 1, FOV 260 × 260, matrix 0\260\260\0; bSSFP – TR 5.832 ms, TE 2.192 ms, flip angle 65°, NEX 4, FOV 180 × 180, matrix 0\448\256\0. The duration of the bSSFP sequence was 7:29 minutes.

Image Evaluation

Two board-certified neuroradiologists, blinded to all other imaging and clinical information, evaluated each patient’s brain MRI examinations in 2 rounds separated by greater than 2 weeks. For the first-round evaluation, only NCMRI sequences, including the bSSFP sequence, were evaluated. The second-round evaluation utilized postcontrast sequences, excluding the bSSFP sequence. This technique of 2 rounds of imaging-based assessment is in line with techniques previously published in the literature.9,10 The neuroradiologists evaluated the images together to reach a consensus. The order of the patients was randomized for each evaluation session.

The axial, transverse, and craniocaudal dimensions of the residual craniopharyngioma were determined for both sequences. The neuroradiologists were asked to assess their diagnostic confidence for the tumoral involvement of the adjacent structures in each study by using a 3-point scale (2 = confident, 1 = adequate, 0 = unsure). This assessment was done for CN II, CN III, cavernous sinus, middle cerebral artery (MCA) anterior cerebral artery (ACA), basilar artery, internal carotid artery (ICA) and the third ventricle.

Statistical Analysis

Tumor volume, as well as solid and cystic component measurements, were evaluated by using paired t-tests. The analysis of diagnostic confidence for tumoral involvement of the adjacent structures was performed by using chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Patient Demographics

A total of 29 patients were included in this study (Table 1), with 13 (44.8%) males and 16 (55.2%) females. The mean age was 21.5 ± 4.3 years. Approximately 21 (72.4%) patients exhibited the adamantinomatous type of craniopharyngioma, while the remaining 8 (27.6%) patients had an unspecified type. Most of the patients (27, 93.1%) underwent subtotal resection; meanwhile, gross total resection was reported in 2 (6.9%) patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Demographics

Evaluation of Tumoral Size and Involvement

No statistically significant difference was observed between residual tumor volume measured on bSSFP and ce-T1W sequences (18.86 ± 21.67 cm3 versus 17.64 ± 23.85 cm3, P = .55; Table 2). Similarly, measurements of the dominant solid component volume, the number of cystic components, and the largest cystic component volume demonstrated no significant differences between the 2 sequences (2.71 ± 3.47 cm3 versus 3.95 ± 5.51 cm3, P = .10; 2.5 ± 1.5 cm3 versus 2.9 ± 1.5 cm3, P = .10; 7.61 ± 13.41 cm3 versus 6.84 ± 13.37 cm3, P = .22, respectively). Furthermore, the tumoral involvement of CN II (P = .64), CN III (P = .42), and the adjacent vasculature (P = .05) showed no significant differences. Figures 1 and 2 show 2 representative craniopharyngioma cases where ce-T1W and bSSFP sequences similarly evaluate the tumor and its surrounding structures.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Axial postcontrast T1-weighted (top left) and bSSFP (bottom left) images demonstrate a suprasellar predominantly cystic craniopharyngioma (star). Both sequences demonstrate abutment of the right internal carotid artery by the craniopharyngioma (white arrows). The left internal carotid artery (green arrow) is spared. In the coronal view, both postcontrast T1-weighted (top right) and bSSFP (bottom right) images adequately show the relationship between the craniopharyngioma and the optic tract (yellow arrows) and CN III (orange arrows), which are not in direct contact.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Axial postcontrast T1-weighted (top left) and bSSFP (bottom left) images demonstrate a suprasellar mixed cystic/solid craniopharyngioma (star). Both sequences demonstrate that the lesion abuts the optic chiasm anteriorly (yellow arrow), with splaying of the optic tracts (blue arrow) along the lateral aspects of the craniopharyngioma. Posteriorly, the craniopharyngioma abuts the mammillary bodies (green arrows). In the coronal view, both postcontrast T1-weighted (top right) and bSSFP images (bottom right) demonstrate how the craniopharyngioma is encroaching on, but not in direct contact with, the A1 segments of the anterior cerebral arteries (orange arrows).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Discrepancies in measurements between CEMRI and bSSFP

Interrater Reliability

The diagnostic confidence was comparable for evaluation of adjacent structures in both studies (Table 3). There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic confidence for tumor involvement of CN II, MCA, ACA, basilar artery, and the third ventricle between bSSFP and ce-T1W (93.1 versus 96.6, P = .55; 100 versus 96.6, P = .31; 100 versus 96.6, P = .31; 100 versus 96.6, P = .31; 93.1 versus 89.7, P = .64; 100 versus 93.1, P = .15, respectively). Interestingly, a significantly higher level of confidence was observed when bSSFP was used to detect CN III involvement (P = .0001) and ce-T1W for cavernous sinus involvement (P = .02).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Comparative assessment of diagnostic confidence for tumor involvement in adjacent structures

DISCUSSION

Although the diagnostic utility of bSSFP sequences for the evaluation and surveillance of skull base tumors has been well-established, its use in craniopharyngioma surveillance has yet to be described. The findings of our study suggest that bSSFP performs comparably to CEMRI for the assessment of craniopharyngiomas after treatment. Given its superior capability in distinguishing between soft tissue and CSF within the basal cisterns and ventricular system, along with its high signal-to-noise ratio, bSSFP was able to effectively differentiate residual craniopharyngioma from the surrounding CSF, particularly in the suprasellar region where craniopharyngiomas are commonly found.

Additionally, a bSSFP sequence provides better diagnostic confidence in detecting the involvement of CN III by residual craniopharyngioma. The improved confidence and accuracy in assessing tumor involvement can be important in optimizing treatment strategies and minimizing potential complications.12

Our observations align with the findings of a previous study that compared the diagnostic confidence in detecting residual germ cell tumors when bSSFP and ce-T1W sequences were used.9 With its improved contrast and high spatial resolution, bSSFP was able to provide better detection of the tumor in the pineal and suprasellar regions where there is a high volume of CSF.9 Moreover, this study indicated that the use of bSSFP can improve diagnostic confidence when assessing the presence of residual tumor.9 An improvement in interrater agreement was also reported with the use of bSSFP (0.872 with bSSFP and 0.128 without bSSFP). Interestingly, the study found that bSSFP can detect small tumor volumes that may be overlooked by ce-T1W.9 A bSSFP sequence has also been shown to have similar or increased effectiveness for surveillance of other types of brain tumors, such as for the detection of spinal drop metastases in pediatric patients.10

Cyst enlargement is a prevalent complication, which can present both during and after radiation therapy and surgical resection. It may potentially result in obstructive hydrocephalus and visual deficits secondary to optic nerve compression.13,14 Given the observed superiority of the bSSFP sequence in assessing the cystic component of tumors, bSSFP can facilitate the early recognition and detection of such complications, which allows proper and timely interventions that improve patient outcomes.

A bSSFP sequence offers additional advantages compared with traditional ce-T1W. These include improved cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and a reduced risk of potential negative health outcomes due to gadolinium deposition. A bSSFP sequence can be considered more cost-effective since intravenous contrast administration is not used. Furthermore, prolonged use of gadolinium-based contrast may risk free gadolinium deposition in brain tissue and increase the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, especially in patients with reduced renal function or pediatric patients.15 Additionally, bSSFP is considered more feasible for pediatric patients as obtaining intravenous access can be difficult.

Given the effectiveness and advantages of the bSSFP sequence with its superior spatial and contrast resolution, adopting a noncontrast protocol for craniopharyngioma surveillance is highly recommended, especially for pediatric patients and patients with impaired renal function. Because of the similar performance of bSSFP and ce-T1W for evaluating craniopharyngiomas, the use of both sequences may not be necessary for some patients. While some patients may benefit from the use of both imaging techniques for tumor surveillance, our results suggest that performing only 1 of the 2 sequences can be sufficient for tumor surveillance.

This study’s limitations include the small sample size, the lack of long-term follow-up, and the retrospective nature of the study. Patients included in this study were 3–6 months postsurgery, and thus, the follow-up window was relatively short. More information and a more detailed study are needed to fully investigate the use of the bSSFP sequence for long-term follow-up of recurrent or residual tumors. Furthermore, some cases were excluded because of missing information. A prospective study should be conducted in the future to better compare posttreatment tumor surveillance between the 2 imaging techniques. However, our results provide valuable insight into the optimization of imaging protocols for craniopharyngioma surveillance. Further research with a larger cohort is warranted to validate the efficacy of the bSSFP sequence in routine practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that NCMRI, by using a bSSFP sequence, is comparable to ce-T1W MRI for craniopharyngioma surveillance. The potential advantages include reduced contrast exposure and improved diagnostic confidence for CN III involvement.

Footnotes

  • Kelly Trinh and Michael Tang contributed equally to this article.

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fouda MA,
    2. Day EL,
    3. Staffa SJ, et al
    . Postoperative MR imaging surveillance of pediatric craniopharyngioma: new institutional guidelines. Childs Nerv Syst 2021;37:853–61 doi:10.1007/s00381-020-04901-2 pmid:33011870
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bunin GR,
    2. Surawicz TS,
    3. Witman PA, et al
    . The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 1998;89:547–51 doi:10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0547 pmid:9761047
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Müller HL
    . The diagnosis and treatment of craniopharyngioma. Neuroendocrinology 2020;110:753–66 doi:10.1159/000504512 pmid:31678973
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lara-Velazquez M,
    2. Mehkri Y,
    3. Panther E, et al
    . Current advances in the management of adult craniopharyngiomas. Curr Oncol 2022;29:1645–71 doi:10.3390/curroncol29030138 pmid:35323338
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Nakamura K,
    2. McGinley MP,
    3. Jones SE, et al
    . Gadolinium‐based contrast agent exposures and physical and cognitive disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2023;33:85–93 doi:10.1111/jon.13057 pmid:36181666
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rasschaert M,
    2. Weller RO,
    3. Schroeder JA, et al
    . Retention of gadolinium in brain parenchyma: pathways for speciation, access, and distribution. a critical review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020;52:1293–305 doi:10.1002/jmri.27124 pmid:32246802
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Buch K,
    2. Juliano A,
    3. Stankovic KM, et al
    . Noncontrast vestibular schwannoma surveillance imaging including an MR cisternographic sequence: is there a need for postcontrast imaging? J Neurosurg 2018;131:549–54 doi:10.3171/2018.3.JNS1866 pmid:30095338
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cavallaro M,
    2. Coglitore A,
    3. Tessitore A, et al
    . Three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state (3d CISS) imaging and clinical applications in brain pathology. Biomedicines 2022;10:2997doi:10.3390/biomedicines10112997
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mehan WA,
    2. Buch K,
    3. Brasz MF, et al
    . Balanced steady-state free precession techniques improve detection of residual germ cell tumor for treatment planning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:898–903 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6540 pmid:32354710
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Buch K,
    2. Caruso P,
    3. Ebb D, et al
    . Balanced steady-state free precession sequence (CISS/fiesta/3d driven equilibrium radiofrequency reset pulse) increases the diagnostic yield for spinal drop metastases in children with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1355–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5645 pmid:29773567
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ozgen B,
    2. Oguz B,
    3. Dolgun A
    . Diagnostic accuracy of the constructive interference in steady state sequence alone for follow-up imaging of vestibular schwannomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:985–91 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1472 pmid:19193761
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Zacharia BE,
    2. Bruce SS,
    3. Goldstein H, et al
    . Incidence, treatment and survival of patients with craniopharyngioma in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Neuro Oncol 2012;14:1070–78 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos142 pmid:22735773
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lamiman K,
    2. Wong KK,
    3. Tamrazi B, et al
    . A quantitative analysis of craniopharyngioma cyst expansion during and after radiation therapy and surgical implications. Neurosurg Focus 2016;41:E15 doi:10.3171/2016.9.FOCUS16298 pmid:27903114
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Winkfield KM,
    2. Linsenmeier C,
    3. Yock TI, et al
    . Surveillance of craniopharyngioma cyst growth in children treated with proton radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;73:716–21 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.010 pmid:18676089
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Holowka S,
    2. Shroff M,
    3. Chavhan GB
    . Use and safety of gadolinium based contrast agents in pediatric MR imaging. Indian J Pediatr 2019;86:961–66 doi:10.1007/s12098-019-02891-x pmid:30796704
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received April 27, 2024.
  • Accepted after revision July 19, 2024.
  • © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Noncontrast MRI Surveillance of Craniopharyngiomas Using a Balanced Steady-state Free Precession (bSSFP) Sequence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Kelly Trinh, Michael Tang, Claire White-Dzuro, Min Lang, Karen Buch, Sandra Rincon
Noncontrast MRI Surveillance of Craniopharyngiomas Using a Balanced Steady-state Free Precession (bSSFP) Sequence
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2024, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8439

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Noncontrast MRI Surveillance of Craniopharyngiomas Using a Balanced Steady-state Free Precession (bSSFP) Sequence
Kelly Trinh, Michael Tang, Claire White-Dzuro, Min Lang, Karen Buch, Sandra Rincon
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2024, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8439
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Brain Tumor Subtyping Image-Based search via MRI
  • Neuroimaging of Erdheim-Chester Disease
  • CE MRI for Brain Metastasis Detection
Show more Brain Tumor Imaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire