Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleULTRA-HIGH-FIELD MRI/IMAGING OF EPILEPSY/DEMYELINATING DISEASES/INFLAMMATION/INFECTION

Different Glymphatic Kinetics in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

H. Urbach, I.E. Duman Kavus, C. Zander, L. Becker, E. Kellner, M. Reisert, A. El Rahal, F. Volz, K. Wolf, J. Beck, A. Rau and N. Lützen
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8365
H. Urbach
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.U., I.E.D.K., C.Z., L.B., E.K., A.R., N.L.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Urbach
I.E. Duman Kavus
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.U., I.E.D.K., C.Z., L.B., E.K., A.R., N.L.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Zander
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.U., I.E.D.K., C.Z., L.B., E.K., A.R., N.L.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Becker
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.U., I.E.D.K., C.Z., L.B., E.K., A.R., N.L.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Kellner
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.U., I.E.D.K., C.Z., L.B., E.K., A.R., N.L.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
cDepartment of Radiology (E.K., M.R.), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Kellner
M. Reisert
cDepartment of Radiology (E.K., M.R.), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Reisert
A. El Rahal
bDepartments of Neurosurgery (A.E.R., F.V., K.W., J.B.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. El Rahal
F. Volz
bDepartments of Neurosurgery (A.E.R., F.V., K.W., J.B.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F. Volz
K. Wolf
bDepartments of Neurosurgery (A.E.R., F.V., K.W., J.B.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Wolf
J. Beck
bDepartments of Neurosurgery (A.E.R., F.V., K.W., J.B.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Beck
A. Rau
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.U., I.E.D.K., C.Z., L.B., E.K., A.R., N.L.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Rau
N. Lützen
aFrom the Departments of Neuroradiology (H.U., I.E.D.K., C.Z., L.B., E.K., A.R., N.L.), Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The glymphatic (glia-lymphatic) system is a paravascular pathway for the clearance of waste metabolites including amyloid β from the brain. Serial T1 relaxation time measurements after the intrathecal injection of gadolinium-based contrast agents facilitate the analysis of the temporal dynamics that may be different in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) and those without SIH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D T1-weighted magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient echo sequences were acquired in 4 patients with SIH with proved CSF leaks and 12 patients without SIH before, 2–4, 6–8, and 24–48 hours after intrathecal gadobutrol injection. MR scans were warped to the Montreal Neurological Institute space and serial scans were coregistered. T1 relaxation times were measured in predefined ROIs including the subarachnoid space, cortex, white matter, and cervical lymph nodes.

RESULTS: In the subarachnoid space and cortex, T1 relaxation times decreased after 2–4 and 6–8 hours before they increased again. In contrast, in the white matter of the temporal lobe T1 relaxation time still decreased after 24–48 hours. There was a striking difference in patients with SIH who did not show a clear contrast distribution within the brain parenchyma.

CONCLUSIONS: T1 relaxation time curves are compatible with a convective flow driven by arterial pulsations via paravascular spaces surrounding penetrating arteries into the brain’s interstitial fluid in the deep white matter. Different curves in patients with SIH and those without SIH indicate that the CSF pressure also impacts the temporal kinetics of the glymphatic system.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AQP4
aquaporin-4
GBCA
gadolinium-based contrast agents
ISF
interstitial fluid
MP2RAGE
magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient echo
SIH
spontaneous intracranial hypotension

SUMMARY

PREVIOUS LITERATURE:

The glymphatic transport is a convective bulk flow driven by arterial pulsations around the main arterial trunks at the base of the skull.

KEY FINDINGS:

Serial T1 relaxation time measurements demonstrate a lower transport from the CSF, in the cortex, and deep white matter in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) compared with patients without SIH.

KNOWLEDGE ADVANCEMENT:

The CSF pressure also impacts the glymphatic transport, which contributes to the fact that glymphatic transport is larger during sleep.

In the early 2010s, Illif et al1,2 and Nedergaard3 introduced the glymphatic system consisting of 3 serial elements: a para-arterial CSF influx route, a paravenous interstitial fluid (ISF) clearance route, and an intracellular transastrocytic path that couples the 2 extracellular paravascular routes.1⇓-3 The exact route of glymphatic transport is still not clear and the terms para- and perivascular spaces are often mixed.4 Anatomically, the perforating arteries at the base of the brain are enveloped by 2 leptomeningeal membranes with the outer membrane connected to the pia mater and the inner membrane in close proximity to the arterial wall. Thus, the paravascular space at the base of the lenticulostriate arteries is in direct contact with the subarachnoid space. Next to the paravascular space, a perivascular space is located within the arterial tunica media itself.4 The perforating arteries penetrating the cortex from its convexity are different. Enveloped by only 1 leptomeningeal membrane closely applied to the vessel wall and no outer layer, the paravascular space is considered to communicate with the subpial rather than the subarachnoid space. Again, next to the paravascular space a perivascular space within the arterial tunica media exists.4 At the capillary level, the leptomeningeal basement membrane and the glia limitans merge, so that only a perivascular space remains. It is filled with an extracellular matrix and not connected to the subarachnoid space.5 From the capillary level, ISF flows toward perivenous spaces, enters the perivenous spaces, and flows along with veins toward brain meninges where it is collected in meningeal lymphatic vessels located next to major venous sinuses or nasal lymphatic vessels.6,7 At present, it remains unclear whether paravascular and perivascular compartments in humans are anatomically and functionally contiguous and whether interstitial clearance of solutes, neurotoxins and waste proteins including amyloid β occurs via a periarterial route, a paravenous route, or a combination of both.4

The glymphatic transport is considered to be mediated by arterial pulsations resulting in a convective bulk flow that is prominent in areas of the cerebral cortex adjacent to large artery trunks.6⇓-8 CSF-ISF exchange is highly dependent on aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channels in perivascular astrocytic end-feet.2,9 The glymphatic transport has a circadian rhythm with a higher “flow” during sleep and nonrapid eye movement sleep.10 It decreases with poor sleep11 and age, the latter has been suggested to be caused by reduced CSF interstitial influx secondary to decreased pulsatility of hardened arteries,12 reduced CSF production and pressures,13,14 and reduced AQP4 polarization of astrocytes.15 Age-related glymphatic function reduction may also be caused by a poorer meningeal lymphatic drainage to the deep cervical lymph nodes.16

Among several imaging modalities that have been evaluated to depict the glymphatic transport in humans, serial MR imaging cisternography remains the standard.6,8,17⇓-19 Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) are injected into the intrathecal space at a lumbar level and serial MR imaging scans depict the temporal dynamics of how the contrast agent “flows” from the subarachnoid space into the cortex, into the white matter, cerebral veins, and possibly into cervical lymph nodes.17⇓-19 Signal differences in the brain parenchyma however are subtle and quantitative sequences are needed to elaborate differences between patient groups. Here we applied T1 relaxation time measurements derived from magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient echo (MP2RAGE) sequences and compared patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) to patients who underwent MR imaging cisternography due to proven or suspected cranial CSF leaks (non-SIH group). We hypothesized that the T1 relaxation time curves differ in patients with SIH and those without SIH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

We prospectively enrolled 16 consecutive patients who underwent MR imaging cisternography as a part of their diagnostic work-up at the University of Freiburg Medical Center between February 2021 and October 2023 (mean age 55.6 ± 12 years; 9 women, 7 men) (Table 1). Indications for MR imaging cisternography were symptoms suggestive for SIH to localize a spinal CSF leak or suspected or proved CSF rhinorrhea.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Patient characteristics

MR Imaging Protocol

All patients received the simultaneous intrathecal application of 0.5 mL gadobutrol (Gadovist, Bayer) and 15 mL iopamidol (Solutrast 250 mol/L, Bracco) at a lumbar level. Patients were studied before, between 2–4, 6–8, and after 24–48 hours on a 3T scanner (Magnetom Prisma, Siemens) by using a 64-channel head and neck coil. To depict a cranial CSF leak, a highly resolved sagittal compressed sensing T1-weighted black-blood sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) sequence was acquired.20 Sequence parameters resulting in an almost isotropic resolution of 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.6 mm3 were TR/TE, 800/5.1 ms; field of view, 210 × 210 mm2; 256 slices; section thickness, 0.60 mm; matrix, 384 × 384; fat saturation; pixel bandwidth, 450 Hz/px; turbo factor, 50; total scan time, 6:50 min. To analyze the temporal dynamics of the GBCA distribution, a sagittal, isotropic 1 mm³ MP2RAGE sequence TR/TE, 5000/2.88 ms; TI1, 700, TI2, 2500 ms; field of view, 256 × 256 mm2; 160 slices; section thickness, 1 mm; matrix, 256 × 256; pixel bandwidth, 240 Hz/px turbo factor, 160; total scan time, 8:52 min), was acquired from which T1 relaxation time maps were generated.

Demographic and clinical findings including CSF opening pressure, Bern score, and CT myelography results were recorded from the patient charts.9⇓-11

Postprocessing

Using the toolbox NORA (www.nora-imaging.org), T1 relaxation time maps before, 2–4, 6–8, and 24–48 hours after injection were warped to the Montreal Neurological Institute space and coregistered by using SPM 12 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/). T1 relaxation times were measured in predefined ROIs of equal size and volume (0.63 cm2 and 0.095 mL, respectively) in the interpeduncular cistern, cortex (anterior insula), and white matter of the temporal and frontal lobes, respectively (Fig 1). For the subarachnoid CSF space, a single ROI was placed at interpeduncular cistern. For the brain parenchyma, an ROI was placed bilaterally in the cortex (anterior insula), in the white matter of the temporal and frontal lobes. In addition, T1 relaxation times were measured in ROIs manually identified in each patient in cervical lymph nodes. Because lymph nodes were of different size and location, these measurements were performed in the PACS.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

T1 relaxation time curves in a 69-year-old woman with rhinorrhea after prolactinoma surgery (non-SIH group). T1 relaxation times decrease in the interpeduncular cistern (A) and the anterior insula (B) before they increase again after 6–8 hours. In contrast, T1 relaxation times in the white matter of the frontal and temporal lobes (C and D) decrease between 6–8 and 24 to 48 hours. The right column shows curves averaged over SIH and non-SIH groups: In the SIH group (blue lines), a significant T1 relaxation time decrease only occurs in the subarachnoid space. (*P < .05, **P < .01).

Statistics

SPSS Statistics for Macintosh (version 28.0; IBM), R (version 4.3.0, https://www.R-project.org/), and the open-source statistical software Jamovi version 2.4.8.0 (https://www.jamovi.org) were used for statistical analysis. A 1-sample Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to check for the assumption of normal distribution. Quantitative variables were expressed as number (percentage), mean ± standard deviation, or median [interquartile range], as appropriate. Differences between categoric data were determined by using Pearson χ2 test, and differences between groups for continuous data were determined by using independent samples t tests accounting for unequal variances or a Mann-Whitney U test. Statistically significant changes in T1 relaxation times over time were determined by linear mixed model analysis. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics Statement

The study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Approval of our study protocol was granted (No. 21–1046) by the institutional review board of the University of Freiburg Medical Center, and all participants provided informed written consent before the inclusion.

RESULTS

Four patients with SIH (mean age 59 ± 8.4, 3 women and 1 man) with proved spinal CSF leaks were compared with 12 (1 patient had 2 examinations) patients (54.2 ± 13.5, 6 women and 6 men) who had either CSF rhinorrhea due to idiopathic intracranial hypertension, after surgery, or no SIH according to International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria (non-SIH group)21⇓-23 (Table 1). Sex and age distribution were similar in both groups: SIH group (59 [48–68] years, 3/4 women), non-SIH group (55 [32–76] years, 6/12 women).

T1 relaxation times decreased significantly over time in the interpeduncular cistern, cortex, and white matter of the non-SIH group, whereas in the SIH group a significant decrease was seen only in the interpeduncular cistern at 2–4 hours and 6–8 hours after contrast injection (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

T1 relaxation times (ms) in the interpeduncular cistern, gray matter (insular cortex), white matter of the temporal and frontal lobes, and cervical lymph nodes

Temporal dynamics showed the highest contrast (steepest T1 relaxation decrease) in the interpeduncular cistern after 2–4 hours, in the cortex after 6–8 hours, and in the white matter after 24–48 hours, respectively (Table 2) (Figs 1–3). There was no difference between groups at any time point in CSF. There were statistically significant differences between patients with SIH and those without SIH in insular gray matter at 2–4, 6–8, and 24–48 hours after contrast injection (P = .028, P = .018, and P = .042, respectively), in frontal white matter at 24–48 hours (P = .013), and in temporal white matter at 6–8 hours and 24–48 hours after contrast injection (P = .006 and P = .042).

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

T1 relaxation time difference maps in the 69-year-old woman reported in Fig 1. A, Pre; B, 2–4 hours; C, 6–8 hours; D, 24–48 hours after intrathecal gadobutrol injection. Brain-wide enhancement over time is shown as T1 relaxation time difference. The T1 relaxation time difference in milliseconds is indicated by the color scale. After 2–4 hours, gadobutrol is seen in the ventricles and subarachnoid space. After 6–8 hours, gadobutrol is seen especially in the subcortical area. After 24–48 hours, gadobutrol has progressed deep into the brain parenchyma and is beginning to be cleared from the ventricles.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

T1 relaxation time difference maps in a 68-year-old woman with SIH due to a CSF venous fistula at T10-11 of the left side. A, Pre; B, 2–4 hours; C, 6–8 hours; D, 24–48 hours after intrathecal gadobutrol injection. Tracer accumulation occurs primarily in brain regions adjacent to large arterial trunks at the surface (6–8 hours), but is sparse in the white matter (24–48 hours).

CSF

The mean T1 relaxation time before contrast administration differed significantly from the mean of the 3 time points after contrast agent injection in the no SIH group (P < .001, Table 2), while in the SIH group there was only a statistically significant difference in the pair-wise comparisons of the measurements before and after 2–4 hours (P < .001) and before and after 6–8 hours (P = .01).

Gray Matter

T1 relaxation times before contrast differed from the other 3 time points in the non-SIH group (P < .001), but not in the SIH group (Table 2).

Temporal White Matter

The mean T1 relaxation time before contrast injection differed from the measurements at 6–8 hours and 24–48 hours in the no SIH group (P = .002 and P < .001), but not in the SIH group.

Frontal White Matter

There was a statistically significant difference only in the no SIH group when pair-wise comparing T1 relaxation times before and after 24–48 hours (P < .005).

Cervical Lymph Nodes

When both groups were considered together, mean T1 relaxation time before differed from the mean time after 2–4 hours only (P = .039).

DISCUSSION

This study replicates earlier studies showing the temporal dynamics of intrathecally injected GBCA, which first opacify the subarachnoid space, then enter the cortex before they are finally visualized in the deep white matter. Imaging cannot resolve whether this “flow” takes place in the para- or perivascular spaces, thus we refer to the term paravascular spaces that Iliff et al1,2 and Nedergaard3 used in their pivotal publications. The serial time relaxation curves are compatible with a glymphatic transport and are considered to represent convective or bulk flow driven by arterial pulsations that are prominent close to large artery trunks at the brain surface.6⇓-8,24 However, the different temporal dynamics in patients with SIH indicates that not only arterial pulsations but also the CSF pressure or the CSF volume impacts on the glymphatic flow. One may speculate that the reduced alertness (“brain fog”) reported by approximately 1 in 3 patients with SIH is due to a lower glymphatic transport.25 A different CSF pressure may also explain why the glymphatic transport is stronger during sleep, when the intracranial pressure is higher than when standing upright. Accordingly, a higher CSF flow in supine compared with upright positions was recently shown in a phase-contrast MR imaging study.26 Also, continuous positive airway pressure increases the CSF flow and likely the glymphatic clearance of waste proteins.27 A different CSF flow pattern in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus also differs from those of healthy controls by means of an early and persisting ventricular regurgitation of GBCA, as well as by enhancement of periventricular tissue across the ependymal ventricular lining, which is particularly prominent on late MR imaging scans.28

The visualization of the glymphatic system via intrathecal gadolinium clearly differs from IV contrast injections in which GBCA enter the brain not only along para- or perivascular spaces of penetrating cortical arteries, but also via the choroid plexus, the ciliary bodies of the eyes, and along perineural sheaths of cranial nerves.29 In our series, we could not detect T1 relaxation time changes in the globes. A different route has also been described for opacification of the perilymph spaces of the cochlea favoring an intrathecal instead over an IV contrast injection.30

We were able to detect T1 shortening in cervical lymph nodes only 2–4 hours after intrathecal contrast injection, which is difficult to interpret and may be related to the fact that only a few scans were acquired after 48 hours, the time point when intrathecally injected gadobutrol has been found in cervical lymph nodes.31

Limitations

Because intrathecal gadolinium injection is off-label, we can report on a small sample size of 16 patients (17 examinations, 1 patient had 2 examinations) only.32,33 The sample size is however comparable to former studies with 8 and 17 patients, respectively.17,18,28 MRI scans after intrathecal GBCA injection reliably display a CSF loss via the cribriform plate but do not have the temporal and spatial resolution to detect ventral or lateral spinal dural tears in patients with SIH.20,22 Whether it can show CSF venous fistulas is a matter of debate.34 Dynamic digital subtraction and CT myelographic techniques have surpassed intrathecal gadolinium injections, so it is unlikely to significantly increase the number of patients with SIH.22 Patients with SIH may not have been studied at exactly the same time points and may behave differently, eg, they stay in the supine position longer than the patients without SIH. However, staying in the supine position longer should enhance glymphatic transport as described above.26

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal gadolinium-based contrast agent displays the glymphatic transport through the brain. This transport is not only driven by a convective flow but also dependent on the CSF volume and pressure.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Iliff JJ,
    2. Wang M,
    3. Liao Y, et al
    . A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid beta. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:147ra111 doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748 pmid:22896675
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Iliff JJ,
    2. Lee H,
    3. Yu MF, et al
    . Brain-wide pathway for waste clearance captured by contrast-enhanced MRI. J Clin Invest 2013;123:1299–309 doi:10.1172/JCI67677 pmid:23434588
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nedergaard M
    . Garbage truck of the brain. Science 2013;340:1529–30 doi:10.1126/science.1240514 pmid:23812703
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Parillo M,
    2. Vaccarino F,
    3. Di Gennaro G, et al
    . Overview of the current knowledge and conventional MRI characteristics of peri- and para-vascular spaces. BrainSci 2024;14:138 doi:10.3390/brainsci14020138
    CrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Agarwal N,
    2. Carare RO
    . Cerebral vessels: an overview of anatomy, physiology, and role in the drainage of fluids and solutes. Front Neurol 2020;11:611485 doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.611485 pmid:33519691
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Eide PK,
    2. Ringstad G
    . Functional analysis of the human perivascular subarachnoid space. Nat Commun 2024;15:2001 doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46329-1 pmid:38443374
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Absinta M,
    2. Ha SK,
    3. Nair G, et al
    . Human and nonhuman primate meninges harbor lymphatic vessels that can be visualized noninvasively by MRI. eLife 2017;6:e29738 doi:10.7554/eLife.29738
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. van Osch MJP,
    2. Wåhlin A,
    3. Scheyhing P, et al
    . Human brain clearance imaging: pathways taken by magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents after administration in cerebrospinal fluid and blood. NMR Biomed 2024;Apr 18:e5159 doi:10.1002/nbm.5159 pmid:38634301
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Nagelhus EA,
    2. Mathiisen TM,
    3. Ottersen OP
    . Aquaporin-4 in the central nervous system: cellular and subcellular distribution and coexpression with KIR4.1. Neuroscience 2004;129:905–13 doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.08.053 pmid:15561407
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Xie L,
    2. Kang H,
    3. Xu Q, et al
    . Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science 2013;342:373–77 doi:10.1126/science.1241224 pmid:24136970
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Eide PK,
    2. Vinje V,
    3. Pripp AH, et al
    . Sleep deprivation impairs molecular clearance from the human brain. Brain 2021;144:863–74 doi:10.1093/brain/awaa443 pmid:33829232
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Zieman SJ,
    2. Melenovsky V,
    3. Kass DA
    . Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and therapy of arterial stiffness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:932–43 doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000160548.78317.29 pmid:15731494
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chen RL,
    2. Kassem NA,
    3. Redzic ZB, et al
    . Age-related changes in choroid plexus and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier function in the sheep. Exp Gerontol 2009;44:289–96 doi:10.1016/j.exger.2008.12.004 pmid:19133323
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fleischman D,
    2. Berdahl JP,
    3. Zaydlarova J, et al
    . Cerebrospinal fluid pressure decreases with older age. PLoS One 2012;7:e52664 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052664 pmid:23300737
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kress BT,
    2. Iliff JJ,
    3. Xia M, et al
    . Impairment of paravascular clearance pathways in the aging brain. Ann Neurol 2014;76:845–61 doi:10.1002/ana.24271 pmid:25204284
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Cai J,
    3. Zhang W, et al
    . Impairment of the glymphatic pathway and putative meningeal lymphatic vessels in the aging human. Ann Neurol 2020;87:357–69 doi:10.1002/ana.25670 pmid:31916277
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ringstad G,
    2. Valnes LM,
    3. Dale AM, et al
    . Brain-wide glymphatic enhancement and clearance in humans assessed with MRI. JCI Insight 2018;3:e121537 doi:10.1172/jci.insight.121537
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Dyke JP,
    2. Xu HS,
    3. Verma A, et al
    . MRI characterization of early CNS transport kinetics post intrathecal gadolinium injection: trends of subarachnoid and parenchymal distribution in healthy volunteers. Clin Imaging 2020;68:1–6 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.043 pmid:32544736
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ringstad G,
    2. Valnes LM,
    3. Vatnehol SAS, et al
    . Prospective T1 mapping to assess gadolinium retention in brain after intrathecal gadobutrol. Neuroradiology 2023;65:1321–31 doi:10.1007/s00234-023-03198-7 pmid:37479768
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Duman IE,
    2. Demerath T,
    3. Stadler A, et al
    . High-resolution gadolinium-enhanced MR cisternography using compressed-sensing T1 SPACE technique for detection of intracranial CSF leaks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:116–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6852 pmid:33122210
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Dobrocky T,
    2. Grunder L,
    3. Breiding PS, et al
    . Assessing spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension with a scoring system based on brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:580–87 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4921 pmid:30776059
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Luetzen N,
    2. Dovi-Akue P,
    3. Fung C, et al
    . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: diagnostic and therapeutic workup. Neuroradiology 2021;63:1765–72 doi:10.1007/s00234-021-02766-z pmid:34297176
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018;38:1–211 doi:10.1177/0333102417738202 pmid:29368949
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Watts R,
    2. Steinklein JM,
    3. Waldman L, et al
    . Measuring glymphatic flow in man using quantitative contrast-enhanced MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:648–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5931 pmid:30679221
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Volz F,
    2. Wolf K,
    3. Fung C, et al
    . Impact of spinal CSF leaks on quality of life and mental health and long-term reversal by surgical closure. Neurol Clin Pract 2024;14:e200272 doi:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200272 pmid:38585435
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Muccio M,
    2. Chu D,
    3. Minkoff L, et al
    . Upright versus supine MRI: effects of body position on craniocervical CSF flow. Fluids Barriers CNS 2021;18:61 doi:10.1186/s12987-021-00296-7 pmid:34952607
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ozturk B,
    2. Koundal S,
    3. Al Bizri E, et al
    . Continuous positive airway pressure increases CSF flow and glymphatic transport. JCI Insight 2023;8:e170270 doi:10.1172/jci.insight.170270
    CrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ringstad G,
    2. Vatnehol SAS,
    3. Eide PK
    . Glymphatic MRI in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 2017;140:2691–705 doi:10.1093/brain/awx191 pmid:28969373
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Deike-Hofmann K,
    2. Reuter J,
    3. Haase R, et al
    . Glymphatic pathway of gadolinium-based contrast agents through the brain overlooked and misinterpreted. Invest Radiology 2019;54:229–37 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000533 pmid:30480554
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Totten DJ,
    2. Booth KTA,
    3. Mosier KM, et al
    . Human cochlear diffusion from the cerebrospinal fluid space with gadolinium contrast. Mol Ther 2023;31:2566–69 doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.08.001 pmid:37582360
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Eide PK,
    2. Vatnehol SAS,
    3. Emblem KE, et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging provides evidence of glymphatic drainage from human brain to cervical lymph nodes. Sci Rep 2018;8:7194 doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25666-4 pmid:29740121
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Halvorsen M,
    2. Edeklev CS,
    3. Fraser-Green J, et al
    . Off-label intrathecal use of gadobutrol: safety study and comparison of administration protocols. Neuroradiology 2021;63:51–61 doi:10.1007/s00234-020-02519-4 pmid:32803338
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Edeklev CS,
    2. Halvorsen M,
    3. Løvland G, et al
    . Intrathecal use of gadobutrol for glymphatic MR imaging: prospective safety study of 100 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1257–64 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6136 pmid:31320462
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Chazen JL,
    2. Robbins MS,
    3. Strauss SB, et al
    . MR myelography for the detection of CSF-venous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:938–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6521 pmid:32354709
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received March 22, 2024.
  • Accepted after revision May 19, 2024.
  • © 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Different Glymphatic Kinetics in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
H. Urbach, I.E. Duman Kavus, C. Zander, L. Becker, E. Kellner, M. Reisert, A. El Rahal, F. Volz, K. Wolf, J. Beck, A. Rau, N. Lützen
Different Glymphatic Kinetics in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2024, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8365

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Different Glymphatic Kinetics in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
H. Urbach, I.E. Duman Kavus, C. Zander, L. Becker, E. Kellner, M. Reisert, A. El Rahal, F. Volz, K. Wolf, J. Beck, A. Rau, N. Lützen
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2024, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8365
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Glymphatics in neurovascular diseases
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Automated Lesion Segmentation Software in MS
  • DL Image Reconstruction in T2-Weighted TSE at 7T
  • 7T MRI vasculitis imaging
Show more Ultra-High-Field MRI/Imaging of Epilepsy/Demyelinating Diseases/Inflammation/Infection

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire