Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Volumetric Changes of the Choroid Plexus Before and After Spinal CSF Leak Repair

Karen Buch, Aaron Paul, Neo Poyiadji and William A. Mehan
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8514
Karen Buch
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karen Buch
Aaron Paul
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neo Poyiadji
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Neo Poyiadji
William A. Mehan
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with intracranial hypotension from spinal CSF leaks have increased choroid plexus volumes in response to CSF leakage. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in choroid plexus volumes in patients before and after spinal CSF leak repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, institutional review board–approved study on patients with spinal CSF leak who had pre- and post-CSF leak repair MRI examinations. Brain MRIs with contrast were performed on a 1.5/3T scanner with acquisition of 3D T1 postcontrast (eg, Bravo, MPRAGE, and so forth). Choroid plexus volumes at the level of the trigonum ventriculi were calculated for the left and right sides on all pre- and posttreatment MRIs using Visage-7 segmentation tools. Basic demographic data, type of CSF leak, and choroid plexus volumes were recorded for all patients. Basic 2-tailed t tests were used to compare choroid plexus volumes between the pre- and posttreatment groups.

RESULTS: Twenty patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension from spinal CSF leaks were included. Eleven patients (55%) had a type 1a (ventral tear) spinal CSF leak, 5 patients (25%) had type 1b (lateral tear), and 4 patients (20%) had a type 3 spinal CSF leak. The mean age was 47.6 years (SD, 13.8 years). The mean choroid plexus volumes pretreatment were 0.82 cm3 (SD, 0.29 cm3) compared with 0.38 cm3 (SD, 0.19 cm3) posttreatment (P value 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Significantly decreased choroid plexus volumes were seen in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension following spinal CSF leak repair. This finding highlights the modulation and dynamic role of the choroid plexus in states of low CSF volumes.

ABBREVIATION:

SIH
spontaneous intracranial hypotension

The choroid plexus comprises specialized cells charged with modulating CSF production.1⇓-3 Prior studies have shown that the choroid plexus is a dynamic structure not only demonstrating changes during the life span but also playing a role in neuroinflammation and neuroimmune modulation.4⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓-15 Additionally, the modulation of CSF volume is also an important role of the choroid plexus, with prior studies demonstrating hyperplasia of the choroid plexus in the setting of hydrocephalus.16,17 A recent study also demonstrated increased volumes of the choroid plexus in patients with spinal CSF leaks compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls.18 This work reveals that volumetric changes of the choroid plexus occur in states of low CSF volume via compensatory modulation. Potentially, choroid plexus volumes may be used as an independent biomarker for CSF homeostasis and may potentially be added to the criteria assessing spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) such as the Bern score; however, additional investigations into this topic are needed.19⇓⇓-22 The purpose of this study was to evaluate intrapatient changes in choroid plexus volumes for individuals with spinal CSF leak before and after successful leak repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, institutional review board–approved study performed at a single institution. Patients were included in this study if they met the following conditions: 1) adult patients, 2) with clinical and imaging features of SIH on brain MRI, 3) who had a spinal CSF leak diagnosed on CT myelography, 4) who underwent surgical repair of the spinal CSF leak at our institution, and 5) who had a post-CSF leak treatment MRI. Patients were excluded from this cohort if they had MRI examinations that were severely degraded by artifacts and were not of diagnostic quality. Additionally, patients who underwent CSF leak treatment but achieved a suboptimal response (defined as incomplete symptom resolution, persistence of symptoms, and/or lack of resolution of intracranial imaging features of SIH on MRI) were excluded.

All brain MRI examinations in this study were performed with gadolinium contrast and included an isotropic 3D T1 sequence (such as Bravo [GE Healthcare], MPRAGE, and so forth). Pretreatment MRI brain studies were evaluated over a 7-year time period from 2017 to 2023 and were all performed immediately before identification of the spinal CSF leak on myelography. Posttreatment MRI brain studies were performed after surgical repair during an 8-year period from 2017 to 2024. Examinations were acquired across multiple MRI vendor platforms and included 1.5T and 3T magnet strengths (Signa Artist, Signa HX, and Signa Excite HDx; GE Healthcare; Magnetom Prisma Fit and Magnetom Skyra; Siemens).

Manual 3D T1-postcontrast choroid plexus contouring was performed in Visage-7 (Visage Imaging) using the 3D Freehand tool ROI under the segmentation toolkit (Visage, Version 7.1.18). From these manual contours, a 3D volume of the choroid plexus was calculated. This was performed for both the left and right sides at the trigonum ventriculi, using a technique previously published in the literature and shown in Fig 1.18,23-24 The choroid plexus volumes were independently calculated for the left and right sides in all patients on both the pretreatment and posttreatment scans and were counted as 4 independent and discrete data points (ie, 2 choroid plexus volumes on pretreatment MRI and 2 choroid plexus volumes on posttreatment MRI per patient). Using the methodology previously published, if present, we excluded choroid plexus cysts and xanthogranuloma from the volumetric contours.18 Choroid plexus contours were performed by 2 neuroradiologists with Certificates of Added Qualification.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

A 65-year-old woman with a type 3 CSF leak, status post surgical repair presenting for routine follow-up brain MRI. Axial T1 postcontrast MPRAGE sequences are shown demonstrating a manual segmentation of the left choroid plexus. A magnified view of the same patient; the same slice is shown on the right-hand panel.

Basic demographic data including patient age, sex, type of spinal CSF leak, pretreatment, and Bern score were recorded for all patients.22,25

Statistical analysis using a 2-tailed t test was used to compare choroid plexus volumes between pretreatment and posttreatment MRI examinations for the patients with SIH with spinal CSF leaks. Additionally, a correlation coefficient was calculated between the mean of the left and right choroid plexus volumes in each patient compared with the pretreatment Bern score. The methodology proposed in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist was followed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included in this study, with a total of 80 recorded choroid plexus volumes (2 pretreatment volumes and 2 posttreatment volumes for each patient). The mean patient age was 47.6 years (SD, 13.8 years; range, 25–65 years). There were 8 men and 12 women in this cohort.

There were 11 patients (55%) with type 1a (ventral tear) spinal CSF leak, 5 patients with type 1b (lateral tear) leaks, and 4 (20%) patients with a type 3 spinal CSF leak. Pretreatment MRI scans all demonstrated imaging features consistent with SIH with a mean Bern score of 7 (SD, 1.6; range, 5–9). Posttreatment MRI scans demonstrated complete resolution of intracranial imaging features of SIH and a Bern score of zero for all patients.

The mean choroid plexus volume on pretreatment examinations was 0.82 cm3 (SD, 0.3; interquartile range, 0.33), compared to posttreatment mean volumes of 0.38 cm3 (SD, 0.22; interquartile range, 0.28) (P value < .0001) (Fig 2). A summary of this demographic, clinical, and imaging data is shown in the Table, and a representative case is shown in Fig 2. There was no statistically significant correlation between the pretreatment Bern score and the mean choroid plexus volume for each patient (r = 0.02, P = .93). For the patients with types 1a and 1b spinal CSF leaks, the mean choroid plexus pretreatment volume was 0.8 cm3 with a mean choroid plexus posttreatment volume of 0.4 cm3, a 50% reduction. For the type 3 spinal CSF leaks, the mean pretreatment choroid plexus volume was 0.9 cm3 compared with 0.35 cm3 posttreatment, a 38% reduction.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Axial T1 postcontrast MPRAGE sequences at the level of the atria in the same 65-year-old woman with a type 3 spinal CSF leak shown in Fig 1. The upper image demonstrates the pretreatment brain MRI. The lower image shows the posttreatment brain MRI. By visual inspection, the volume of the choroid plexus on the pretreatment examination compared with the posttreatment MRI has markedly decreased.

The time between the pretreatment brain MRI and posttreatment brain MRI was somewhat variable with a mean follow-up interval of 25 months (range, 1–76 months).

DISCUSSION

A statistically significant decrease in the volumes of the choroid plexus was seen on the posttreatment MRI scans compared with pretreatment MRI scans for patients with spinal CSF leaks. In this group of patients who had successful treatment of known spinal CSF leaks, defined as complete resolution of symptoms and imaging findings suggestive of SIH, the choroid plexus demonstrates volumetric modulation based on changing states of CSF volumes. Prior research has shown that choroid plexus volumes in patients with spinal CSF leaks are significantly larger than those in healthy controls,18 this study builds off of that prior research suggesting that the enlargement of the choroid plexus may be transient and reversible if CSF leakage can be successfully stopped. This finding is thought to demonstrate the dynamic and compensatory ability of the choroid plexus to downregulate CSF production once the spinal CSF leak is treated.1,2,26,27 As postulated previously, both hyperplasia and vascular engorgement related to expansion of the intracranial blood pool in SIH may have contributed to higher pretreatment choroid plexus volumes in these patients. It is also possible that the compensatory increases in CSF production in patients with spinal CSF leak could be via other mechanisms, including the upregulation of transporter proteins in epithelial cells by the choroid plexus and changes in blood volume to the choroid stroma.28⇓⇓-31 There may be downregulation of choroid plexus membrane proteins as well as decreased perfusion and blood pool following successful CSF leak repair. Further work and investigations into the mechanisms of modulation by the choroid plexus in patients with spinal CSF leaks are needed.

This study has limitations. First, the sample size is relatively small. While spinal CSF leaks are becoming an increasingly recognized pathology, their overall incidence remains relatively low. Furthermore, posttreatment MRI scanning was variable in our spinal CSF study population, likely reflective of our institution being a tertiary referral center for the treatment of spinal CSF leaks, attracting patients from across the nation, as well as heterogeneity within our own providers with respect to standardized posttreatment follow-up imaging. The lack of a standardized diagnostic work-up and posttreatment imaging and assessment of these patients with spinal CSF leak results in data heterogeneity, reduces cohort numbers, and limits the ability for multi-institutional comparisons/studies. This sentiment has been previously echoed by others in the spinal CSF leak literature.32,33 As a result, the time between spinal CSF leak repair and posttreatment MRI was variable. Additionally, this study looked solely at choroid plexus volumes as the primary metric. For future direction, adding a functional component to the structural, volumetric component would help gain additional insights into the dynamic and modulating function of the choroid plexus.

Furthermore, potential confounders such as medication usage, body mass index, blood pressure, and hydration status were not considered in this study and may impact the generalizability of these results. Last, patients were scanned on a combination of 1T and 3T platforms. Some differences in scanner strengths on pretreatment and posttreatment imaging may contribute to potential differences in choroid plexus volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

Choroid plexus volumes significantly decreased in spinal CSF leaks following repair of the leaks compared with their pretreatment volumes. This finding reflects the dynamic nature of the choroid plexus likely aiding in the modulation of CSF production in SIH. Future investigations into these structural changes in various CSF volumetric states may aid in the determination of choroid plexus volumes as a potential biomarker.

 Pretreatment Patients with SIH (n = 20)Posttreatment Patients with SIH (n = 20)P Value
Age (mean, SD) (yr)47.6, 13.8
Sex (M/F)8:12 
Bern score (mean, SD)7.1, 1.60, 0<.0001
Type of spinal CSF leak   
 Type 1a11 
 Type 1b5
 Type 34 
CP volume (mean, SD) (cm3)0.82, 0.290.38, 0.22<.0001
  • Note:—CP indicates choroid plexus; M, male; F, female.

  • a Pretreatment spinal CSF choroid plexus volumes were compared with posttreatment spinal CSF choroid plexus volumes for a cohort of 20 patients.

Basic demographic, clinical, and imaging features of patients with SIHa

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.
    1. Neman J,
    2. Chen TC
    1. Hofman FM,
    2. Chen TC
    . Choroid plexus: structure and function. In: Neman J, Chen TC. (eds) The choroid plexus and cerebrospinal fluid London, UK: Elsevier, 2016, pp. 29–40
  2. 2.
    1. Lun MP,
    2. Monuki ES,
    3. Lehtinen MK
    . Development and functions of the choroid plexus-cerebrospinal fluid system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2015;16:445–57 doi:10.1038/nrn3921 pmid:26174708
  3. 3.
    1. Arnaud K,
    2. Di Nardo AA
    . Choroid plexus trophic factors in the developing and adult brain. Front Biol 2016;11:214–21 doi:10.1007/s11515-016-1401-7
  4. 4.
    1. May C,
    2. Kaye JA,
    3. Atack JR, et al
    . Cerebrospinal fluid production is reduced in healthy aging. Neurology 1990;40:500–03 doi:10.1212/wnl.40.3_part_1.500 pmid:2314595
  5. 5.
    1. Chiu C,
    2. Miller MC,
    3. Caralopoulos IN, et al
    . Temporal course of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and amyloid accumulation in the aging rat brain from three to thirty months. Fluids Barriers CNS 2012;9:3 doi:10.1186/2045-8118-9-3 pmid:22269091
  6. 6.
    1. Eisma JJ,
    2. McKnight CD,
    3. Hett K, et al
    . Choroid plexus perfusion and bulk cerebrospinal fluid flow across the adult lifespan. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2023;43:269–80 doi:10.1177/0271678X221129101 pmid:36200473
  7. 7.
    1. Choi JD,
    2. Moon Y,
    3. Kim HJ, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume and permeability at brain MRI within the Alzheimer disease clinical spectrum. Radiology 2022;304:635–45 doi:10.1148/radiol.212400 pmid:35579521
  8. 8.
    1. Bouhrara M,
    2. Walker KA,
    3. Alisch JS, et al
    . Association of plasma markers of Alzheimer’s disease, neurodegeneration, and neuroinflammation with the choroid plexus integrity in aging. Aging Dis 2024;15:2230–40 doi:10.14336/AD.2023.1226 pmid:38300640
  9. 9.
    1. Assogna M,
    2. Premi E,
    3. Gazzina S, et al
    . Association of choroid plexus volume with serum biomarkers, clinical features, and disease severity in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration spectrum. Neurology 2023;101:e1218–30 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207600 pmid:37500561
  10. 10.
    1. Jeong SH,
    2. Jeong HJ,
    3. Sunwoo MK, et al
    . Association between choroid plexus volume and cognition in Parkinson disease. Eur J Neurol 2023;30:3114–23 doi:10.1111/ene.15999 pmid:37498202
  11. 11.
    1. Klistorner S,
    2. Van der Walt A,
    3. Barnett MH, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume is enlarged in clinically isolated syndrome patients with optic neuritis. Mult Scler 2023;29:540–44 doi:10.1177/13524585231157206 pmid:36876595
  12. 12.
    1. Li Y,
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Zhong W, et al
    . Choroid plexus enlargement exacerbates white matter hyperintensity growth through glymphatic impairment. Ann Neurol 2023;94:182–95 doi:10.1002/ana.26648 pmid:36971336
  13. 13.
    1. Bravi B,
    2. Melloni EM,
    3. Paolini M, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume is increased in mood disorders and associates with circulating inflammatory cytokines. Brain Behav Immun 2024;116:52–61 doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2023.11.036 pmid:38030049
  14. 14.
    1. Bonifacio C,
    2. Savini G,
    3. Reca C, et al
    . The gut-brain axis: correlation of choroid plexus volume and permeability with inflammatory biomarkers in Crohn’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 2024;192:106416 doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106416 pmid:38272141
  15. 15.
    1. Raghib MF,
    2. Bao F,
    3. Elkhooly M, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume as a marker of retinal atrophy in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2024;457:122884 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2024.122884 pmid:38237367
  16. 16.
    1. Yamada S,
    2. Mase M
    . Cerebrospinal fluid production and absorption and ventricular enlargement mechanisms in hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2023;63:141–51 doi:10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0331 pmid:36858632
  17. 17.
    1. Rekate HL
    . Hydrocephalus in infants: the unique biomechanics and why they matter. Childs Nerv Syst 2020;36:1713–28 doi:10.1007/s00381-020-04683-7 pmid:32488353
  18. 18.
    1. Mehan WA,
    2. Poyiadji N,
    3. Paul AB, et al
    . Volumetric changes in the choroid plexus associated with spontaneous intracranial hypotension in patients with spinal CSF leak. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024;45:1162–65 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8291 pmid:39025635
  19. 19.
    1. Schuchardt FF,
    2. Krafft AJ,
    3. Miguel Telega L, et al
    . Interrelation between cerebrospinal fluid pressure, intracranial morphology and venous hemodynamics studied by 4D flow MRI. Clin Neuroradiol 2024;34:391–401 doi:10.1007/s00062-023-01381-0 pmid:38277058
  20. 20.
    1. Mehan WA Jr.,
    2. Buch K
    . Imaging, clinical, and demographic differences in patients with type 3 spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak (cerebrospinal venous fistulas) compared with patients with types 1 and 2 spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2022;46:986–90 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001369 pmid:36112050
  21. 21.
    1. Callen AL,
    2. Pattee J,
    3. Thaker AA, et al
    . Relationship of Bern score, spinal elastance, and opening pressure in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurology 2023;100:e2237–46 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207267 pmid:37015821
  22. 22.
    1. Dobrocky T,
    2. Grunder L,
    3. Breiding PS, et al
    . Assessing spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension with a scoring system based on brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:580–87 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4921 pmid:30776059
  23. 23.
    1. Curone M,
    2. Peccarisi C,
    3. Bussone G
    . Headache attributed to intracranial pressure alterations: applicability of the International Classification of Headache Disorders ICHD-3 beta version versus ICHD-2. Neurol Sci 2015;36(Suppl 1):137–39 doi:10.1007/s10072-015-2202-5 pmid:26017529
  24. 24.
    1. Senay O,
    2. Seethaler M,
    3. Makris N, et al
    . A preliminary choroid plexus volumetric study in individuals with psychosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2023;44:2465–78 doi:10.1002/hbm.26224 pmid:36744628
  25. 25.
    1. Kim DK,
    2. Carr CM,
    3. Benson JC, et al
    . Diagnostic yield of lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelogram stratified by brain MRI findings. Neurology 2021;96:e1312–18 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000011522 pmid:33472917
  26. 26.
    1. Cox JT,
    2. Gaglani SM,
    3. Jusué-Torres I, et al
    . Choroid plexus hyperplasia: a possible cause of hydrocephalus in adults. Neurology 2016;87:2058–60 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003303 pmid:27733567
  27. 27.
    1. Christensen J,
    2. Li C,
    3. Mychasiuk R
    . Choroid plexus function in neurological homeostasis and disorders: the awakening of the circadian clocks and orexins. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2022;42:1163–75 doi:10.1177/0271678X221082786 pmid:35296175
  28. 28.
    1. MacAulay N,
    2. Keep RF,
    3. Zeuthen T
    . Cerebrospinal fluid production by the choroid plexus: a century of barrier research revisited. Fluids Barriers CNS 2022;19:26 doi:10.1186/s12987-022-00323-1 pmid:35317823
  29. 29.
    1. Steffensen AB,
    2. Oernbo EK,
    3. Stoica A, et al
    . Cotransporter-mediated water transport underlying cerebrospinal fluid formation. Nat Commun 2018;9:2167 doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04677-9 pmid:29867199
  30. 30.
    1. Kaur C,
    2. Rathnasamy G,
    3. Ling EA
    . The choroid plexus in healthy and diseased brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2016;75:198–213 doi:10.1093/jnen/nlv030 pmid:26888305
  31. 31.
    1. Johnson SE,
    2. McKnight CD,
    3. Lants SK, et al
    . Choroid plexus perfusion and intracranial cerebrospinal fluid changes after angiogenesis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2020;40:1658–71 doi:10.1177/0271678X19872563 pmid:31500523
  32. 32.
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Madhavan A,
    3. Garza I, et al
    . Clinical and imaging outcomes of 100 patients with cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas treated by transvenous embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2024 Jun 27. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/jnis-2023-021012 pmid:37898553
  33. 33.
    1. Dobrocky T,
    2. Häni L,
    3. Rohner R, et al
    . Brain spontaneous intracranial hypotension score for treatment monitoring after surgical closure of the underlying spinal dural leak. Clin Neuroradiol 2022;32:231–38 doi:10.1007/s00062-021-01124-z pmid:35028683
  • Received August 3, 2024.
  • Accepted after revision August 28, 2024.
  • © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire