Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurovascular/Stroke Imaging

Absence of the Susceptibility Vessel Sign with Cancer-Associated Hypercoagulability-Related Stroke

Daiki Fukunaga, Jun Fujinami, Toru Kishitani, Naoki Tokuda, Soichiro Numa and Yoshinari Nagakane
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2024, 45 (10) 1427-1431; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8363
Daiki Fukunaga
aFrom the Department of Neurology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daiki Fukunaga
Jun Fujinami
aFrom the Department of Neurology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toru Kishitani
aFrom the Department of Neurology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Toru Kishitani
Naoki Tokuda
aFrom the Department of Neurology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soichiro Numa
aFrom the Department of Neurology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Soichiro Numa
Yoshinari Nagakane
aFrom the Department of Neurology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yoshinari Nagakane

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The susceptibility vessel sign, a hypointense signal on MR T2-weighted gradient-recalled echo images, is associated with erythrocyte-predominant thrombi, which are often present in cardioembolism. In contrast, cancer-associated hypercoagulability (CAH)-related stroke, which is presumably caused by fibrin-predominant thrombi, is associated with the absence of the susceptibility vessel sign. We hypothesized that the prevalence of the susceptibility vessel sign may be helpful in distinguishing CAH-related stroke from cardioembolism. This study attempted to validate this hypothesis and investigated the usefulness of the susceptibility vessel sign in differentiating CAH-related stroke from cardioembolism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients with both CAH-related stroke (CAH group) and cardioembolism (cardioembolism group) who had major cerebral artery occlusion on MRA that was performed within 6 hours of stroke onset. All patients visited our department from 2015 to 2021. CAH-related stroke was defined as the following: 1) complication of active cancer, 2) pretreatment D-dimer value of >3 μg/mL, 3) multiple vascular territory infarctions, and 4) lack of any other specifically identified causes of stroke. We compared susceptibility vessel sign positivity rates within each group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between the absence of the susceptibility vessel sign and CAH-related stroke.

RESULTS: Of 691 patients with CAH-related stroke or cardioembolism, major cerebral artery occlusion was observed in 10 patients in the CAH group and 198 patients in the cardioembolism group. The absence of the susceptibility vessel sign was identified in 55 of 208 patients and was significantly more frequent in the CAH group versus the cardioembolism group (90% versus 24%, P < .05). For predicting CAH-related stroke, the absence of the susceptibility vessel sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI, 59%–99%), specificity of 78% (95% CI, 71%–83%), a positive predictive value of 18% (95% CI, 10–31), a negative predictive value of 99% (95% CI, 96%–99%), and a likelihood ratio of 4.06. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the absence of the susceptibility vessel sign was independently associated with CAH-related stroke (OR, 43; 95% CI, 6.8–863; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS: The absence of the susceptibility vessel sign was more frequent in CAH-related stroke than in cardioembolism. These findings could potentially be helpful for clinical management and differentiating cardioembolism and CAH-related stroke.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CAH
cancer-associated hypercoagulability
CE
cardioembolism
GRE
gradient-recalled echo
SVS
susceptibility vessel sign

SUMMARY

PREVIOUS LITERATURE:

Susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) has been shown to be associated with the component of the thrombi. The SVS positivity rate is high in cardioembolism (CE)due to the erythrocyte-predominant thrombi, while in atherothrombotic brain infarction, the rate is low due to the fibrin-predominant thrombi. Moreover, it has been reported that a higher proportion of stroke patients with active cancer exhibit the absence of SVS as compared with those without. However, there are no reports focusing on cancer associated hypercoagulability (CAH)-related stroke in patients with active cancer.

KEY FINDINGS:

The absence of SVS was more frequent in CAH-related stroke compared with that for CE and it was independently associated with the CAH-related stroke. When differentiating between these two types of strokes, the absence of SVS indicates there is a higher likelihood of CAH-related stroke.

KNOWLEDGE ADVANCEMENT:

The difference in thrombopathology may attribute to the difference in the frequency of SVS in CE and CAH-related stroke. The absence of SVS is valuable in distinguishing between CE and CAH-related stroke in embolic stroke of undetermined source and may serve as a guide in making clinical decisions in these cases.

Patients with cancer face an elevated risk of ischemic stroke, with cancer-associated hypercoagulability (CAH) being the primary mechanism contributing to this risk.1⇓-3 CAH-related stroke is characterized by the presence of high D-dimer levels and multiple vascular territory infarctions.4⇓-6 In some cases, patients with CAH-related stroke experience major cerebral artery occlusion and have MR imaging findings similar to those observed for cardioembolism (CE).7⇓-9

CAH-related stroke and CE both require antithrombotic therapy to prevent recurrence, but the choice of the agent is specific for each mechanism. Typically, direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin is used in CE, while subcutaneous heparin is preferred in CAH-related stroke.2,10 Thus, it is crucial to distinguish between CAH-related stroke and CE to prevent stroke recurrence.

Furthermore, CE and CAH-related stroke contribute to the etiology of embolic stroke of undetermined source. Given the differing clinical management strategies for suspected CE and CAH-related stroke with the etiology of embolic stroke of undetermined source, the differentiation between the 2 conditions is crucial in determining the clinical management strategies.

The susceptibility vessel sign (SVS), which is detected as a hypointense signal on the T2* gradient-recalled echo (GRE) images, is associated with a high proportion of deoxyhemoglobin within the thrombus. Erythrocyte-rich thrombi, which are typically seen in CE, are likely to show the SVS, while fibrin-predominant thrombi, which are typically found in atherothrombotic brain infarction, are less likely to show this. It has been previously reported that the SVS can be useful in helping to distinguish atherothrombotic brain infarction from CE.11⇓⇓⇓-15 Although the thrombus found in CAH-related stroke has also been reported to be fibrin-predominant,8,16,17 the SVS has yet to be fully investigated in patients with CAH-related stroke; thus, the diagnostic role of the SVS in CAH-related stroke remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the SVS in distinguishing CAH-related stroke from CE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Design

This study was a retrospective observational study of patients who were diagnosed with ischemic stroke at a tertiary stroke center (Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan). The need to obtain informed consent for participation was waived due to the retrospective design and the minimal risk to patients.

Study Patients

Of the 2476 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were admitted to the Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital within 7 days after stroke onset between April 2015 and March 2021, we enrolled patients with both CAH-related stroke and CE with major cerebral artery occlusion. Acute ischemic stroke was defined as any new neurologic symptom with acute ischemic lesions confirmed by DWI. CAH-related stroke was defined using the following criteria: 1) complication of active cancer, 2) pretreatment D-dimer value of >3 μg/mL, 3) multiple vascular territory infarctions, and 4) lack of any other specifically identified causes of stroke.18 CE was classified according to the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria.19 Major cerebral artery occlusion was defined as carotid T occlusion (occlusion of the carotid artery, middle and anterior cerebral artery), M1 MCA occlusion, or M2 MCA occlusion. We excluded patients who did not undergo MR imaging within 6 hours of onset. Active cancer was defined as a diagnosis or treatment for any cancer within 6 months before ischemic stroke onset or known recurrent cancer or metastatic disease. Patients with focal nonmelanoma skin cancer and those treated with prophylactic hormone therapy for prior breast cancer were classified as not having active cancer.20

Measurements

Using previous medical records, we collected data regarding age, sex, cardioembolic source, type of cancer, time from onset to MR imaging, pretreatment D-dimer levels, DWI findings, and vascular imaging. The 3-territory sign was defined as the presence of lesions in the 3 vascular territories of the bilateral anterior and posterior circulation.21

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the positivity of the SVS. The SVS was defined as a hypointense signal on T2* GRE at a corresponding symptomatic occlusive vessel, for which the signal exceeded the estimated diameter of the artery (Fig 1).22 The SVS was assessed by 2 independent stroke-specialized neurologists (D.F. and J.F.). When the judgment of the 2 neurologists was inconsistent, a decision was made by discussion without the consideration of any information other than the T2* GRE images.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Assessment of the SVS. Complete occlusion of the right MCA on arterial TOF (A), with the presence of the SVS on the T2* GRE (B). Complete occlusion of the right MCA on arterial TOF (C), with the absence of the SVS on the T2* GRE (D). The arrowheads indicate the part of the vessel occlusion on the TOF and T2* GRE images.

MR Imaging Protocol

We used 2 MR imaging models: Ingenia 1.5T (Philips Healthcare) and Magnetom Avanto 1.5T (Siemens). The T2* GRE sequence was examined using the following parameters: TR/TE = 459/18 ms, flip angle = 20°, section thickness = 6 mm, section gap = 0.6 mm, acquisition time = 80 seconds, matrix = 208 × 209, and field of view = 220 mm.

Statistical Analysis

The Fisher exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used as appropriate to compare the clinical characteristics between the CAH and the CE groups. The κ coefficient was used to determine the interobserver agreement for the SVS on T2* GRE. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between the absence of SVS and CAH-related stroke. The level of significance was considered .05 in all tests. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, Version 9.4.1 (GraphPad Software).

RESULTS

A flow diagram of the patient selection is presented in Fig 2. The final cohort consisted of 208 patients with acute ischemic stroke with major cerebral artery occlusion, which included 10 in the CAH and 198 in the CE groups. The most prevalent cancer types were lung cancer (3 cases) and pancreatic cancer (3 cases). For CE, embolic sources included atrial fibrillation in 186 cases, symptomatic congestive heart failure in 5 cases, paradoxical embolism in 4 cases, and recent myocardial infarction, calcified aortic stenosis, and mechanical valve in 1 case each. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Study flow chart for the inclusion of subjects.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Baseline characteristicsa

The SVS was absent in 55 patients (26%), with 9 cases in the CAH group and 46 cases in the CE group. The absence of the SVS was more frequent in the CAH-versus-CE groups (P < .01) (Fig 3). The absence of the SVS was observed in 22% for the ICA, 11% for M1, and 29% for M2. The κ coefficients for interobserver agreement of the SVS by the 2 examiners were 0.87 and 0.98, while the κ coefficient was 0.92 for interobserver agreement of the SVS. The disagreement rate between the 2 examiners was 9%.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Proportion of the absence of the SVS in each group.

To assess the performance of the absence of the SVS with regard to differentiating CAH-related stroke from CE, we used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the association factor for the CAH-related stroke. Results revealed that the absence of the SVS was independently associated with CAH-related stroke (OR, 43; 95% CI, 6.8–860; P < .01) (Table 2). The absence of the SVS demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI, 59%–99%), specificity of 78% (95% CI, 71%–83%), a positive predictive value of 18% (95% CI, 10%–31%), a negative predictive value of 99% (95% CI, 96%–99%), and a likelihood ratio of 4.06 for predicting CAH-related stroke. The presence of the SVS demonstrated a sensitivity of 78% (95% CI, 71%–83%), specificity of 90% (95% CI, 59%–99%), a positive predictive value of 99% (95% CI, 96%–99%), a negative predictive value of 18% (95% CI, 9%–30%), and a likelihood ratio of 7.78 for predicting CE.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Multivariable logistic regression analysis for the absence of the SVS

DISCUSSION

The present results show that the absence of the SVS was more frequent in CAH-related stroke compared with CE. When one differentiates these 2 types of strokes, the absence of the SVS indicates that there is a higher likelihood of CAH-related stroke.

The high proportion of CAH-related stroke with the absence of the SVS may be attributed to the fibrin-predominant thrombi that were present. The SVS has been shown to be associated with the presence of deoxyhemoglobin, methemoglobin, and hemosiderin within the erythrocytes of the thrombi.11,23 In fact, the SVS positivity rate is high (56%–89%) in CE due to the erythrocyte-predominant thrombi, while in atherothrombotic brain infarction, the rate is low (19%–53%) due to the fibrin-predominant thrombi.12,14,24,25 Similarly, it has been reported that a higher proportion of patients with stroke with active cancer show the absence of the SVS compared with those without active cancer.20 This finding might be because fibrin-predominant thrombi are more frequently observed in patients with stroke with active cancer.26 Fibrin-predominant thrombi are more frequently observed in CAH-related stroke, which is the main subtype of stroke in patients with active cancer, compared with thrombi found in CE or atherothrombotic brain infarction.27 In the present study, we selected study subjects with CAH-related stroke from any of the stroke subtypes in patients with active cancer. Thus, the proportion of CAH-related stroke with the absence of the SVS was markedly high at 90%.

In recent years, mechanical thrombectomy has provided insight into the characteristics of retrieved thrombus. Case reports have shown the presence of fibrin-predominant thrombus pathology in CAH-related stroke.8,16,17 Thrombus formation in CAH-related stroke involves multiple mechanisms leading to hypercoagulability. First, when the vascular endothelium is damaged by high flow or inflammatory cytokines produced by cancer cells, platelets will then adhere to the exposed area of the endothelium. Subsequently, platelets aggregate through an interaction with the activated Von Willebrand factor. Cancer cells cause hypercoagulability through mechanisms such as activating the coagulation cascade with tissue factor, directly activating prothrombin with mucin, and directly activating factor X with cysteine protease. The hypercoagulability leads to the formation of a fibrin-predominant thrombus under high-flow arterial conditions, which then leads to less entrapment of the red blood cells.28

The findings of the present study have the potential for clinical impact in being able to distinguish between CE and CAH-related stroke within the context of embolic stroke of undetermined source. Embolic stroke of undetermined source represents a subset of cryptogenic strokes and accounts for approximately 25% of all ischemic strokes. The causes of embolic stroke of undetermined source include subclinical paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, aortogenic embolism, paradoxical embolism, and cancer-associated stroke.29 While these etiologies all have similar features such as embolic stroke, microvascular invasions, and elevated D-dimer levels, the aortogenic embolism and paradoxical embolism can be diagnosed through additional modalities such as contrast-enhanced angiography or transesophageal echocardiography. As in the present study, although CE is characterized by elderly age compared with CAH-related stroke, the differentiation between CE and CAH-related stroke remains challenging. When one tries to identify the specific causes, such as subclinical paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, the underlying malignancy remains elusive in these cases. In such cases, the absence of the SVS may serve as a guide in making clinical decisions. In summary, the SVS serves as a guide for clinical management strategies. These strategies may involve repeat Holter ECG monitoring or the use of an implantable loop recorder. Conversely, if the SVS is absent, vigilant monitoring will be necessary to detect these malignancies. This includes further investigations and early-stage re-examination of the cancer using CT scans or other diagnostic modalities.

However, there were several limitations for the present study. First, this was a single-center, retrospective study; thus, a selection bias may exist. Also, given the small number of study patients and low incidence of CAH-related stroke, the sample size was significantly unbalanced, reducing the power of statistical analysis. Thus, further studies with larger numbers of cases and multicenter studies are needed. Second, there were some disagreements with the SVS assessment between the 2 examiners. However, the interobserver agreement was high enough to be considered satisfactory. Third, the section thickness and section gap of the T2* GRE at our center were 6/0.6 mm, which is rather thick for assessing cerebral vessels; thus, these features may have affected the SVS evaluation. Moreover, because the SVS evaluation did not use SWI, which is more sensitive than T2* GRE, it is possible that the absence of the SVS may have been overestimated. Fourth, because the appearance and quality of T2*GRE can vary, the present findings may not be fully generalizable. Finally, the thrombus pathology was not assessed. Nevertheless, because in actual clinical practice the thrombopathology is not always confirmed, the results of the current study may be clinically valuable regarding future diagnostic and management strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of the SVS was more frequent in CAH-related stroke compared with CE. Thus, the absence of the SVS might be an important factor for the clinical management and the ability to differentiate CE and CAH-related stroke.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.
    1. Navi BB,
    2. Iadecola C
    . Ischemic stroke in cancer patients: a review of an underappreciated pathology. Ann Neurol 2018;83:873–83 doi:10.1002/ana.25227 pmid:29633334
  2. 2.
    1. Navi BB,
    2. Reiner AS,
    3. Kamel H, et al
    . Risk of arterial thromboembolism in patients with cancer. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:926–38 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.047 pmid:28818202
  3. 3.
    1. Navi BB,
    2. Reiner AS,
    3. Kamel H, et al
    . Association between incident cancer and subsequent stroke. Ann Neurol 2015;77:291–300 doi:10.1002/ana.24325 pmid:25472885
  4. 4.
    1. Bang OY,
    2. Chung JW,
    3. Lee MJ, et al
    ; OASIS-Cancer Study Investigators. Cancer-related stroke: an emerging subtype of ischemic stroke with unique pathomechanisms. J Stroke 2020;22:1–10 doi:10.5853/jos.2019.02278 pmid:32027788
  5. 5.
    1. Kim SG,
    2. Hong JM,
    3. Kim HY, et al
    . Ischemic stroke in cancer patients with and without conventional mechanisms: a multicenter study in Korea. Stroke 2010;41:798–801 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571356 pmid:20150545
  6. 6.
    1. Kwon HM,
    2. Kang BS,
    3. Yoon BW
    . Stroke as the first manifestation of concealed cancer. J Neurol Sci 2007;258:80–83 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2007.02.035 pmid:17408695
  7. 7.
    1. Pan KH,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Chung JW, et al
    . Significance of D-dimer in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion accompanied by active cancer. Front Neurol 2022;13:843871 doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.843871 pmid:35401408
  8. 8.
    1. Matsumoto N,
    2. Fukuda H,
    3. Handa A, et al
    . Histological examination of Trousseau syndrome-related thrombus retrieved through acute endovascular thrombectomy: report of 2 cases. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;25:e227–30 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.041 pmid:27720526
  9. 9.
    1. Lee D,
    2. Lee DH,
    3. Suh DC, et al
    . Intra-arterial thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke patients with active cancer. J Neurol 2019;266:2286–93 doi:10.1007/s00415-019-09416-8 pmid:31175434
  10. 10.
    1. Jang H,
    2. Lee JJ,
    3. Lee MJ, et al
    . Comparison of enoxaparin and warfarin for secondary prevention of cancer-associated stroke. J Oncol 2015;2015:502089 doi:10.1155/2015/502089 pmid:26064116
  11. 11.
    1. Cho KH,
    2. Kim JS,
    3. Kwon SU, et al
    . Significance of susceptibility vessel sign on T2*-weighted gradient echo imaging for identification of stroke subtypes. Stroke 2005;36:2379–83 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000185932.73486.7a pmid:16224077
  12. 12.
    1. Bourcier R,
    2. Derraz I,
    3. Delasalle B, et al
    ; THRACE Investigators. Susceptibility vessel sign and cardioembolic etiology in the THRACE trial. Clin Neuroradiol 2019;29:685–92 doi:10.1007/s00062-018-0699-8 pmid:29947813
  13. 13.
    1. Liu M,
    2. Li L,
    3. Li G
    . The different clinical value of susceptibility vessel sign in acute ischemic stroke patients under different interventional therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2019;62:72–79 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2019.01.002 pmid:30712778
  14. 14.
    1. Kim SK,
    2. Yoon W,
    3. Kim TS, et al
    . Histologic analysis of retrieved clots in acute ischemic stroke: correlation with stroke etiology and gradient-echo MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1756–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4402 pmid:26159515
  15. 15.
    1. Dillmann M,
    2. Bonnet L,
    3. Vuillier F, et al
    . Factors that influence susceptibility vessel sign in patients with acute stroke referred for mechanical thrombectomy. Front Neurol 2022;13:893060 doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.893060 pmid:35645960
  16. 16.
    1. Okada S,
    2. Miyagawa-Hayashino A,
    3. Fujinami J, et al
    . Trousseau’s syndrome associated with pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma exhibiting aggressive features: a case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2020;12:36–40 doi:10.3892/mco.2019.1947 pmid:31814975
  17. 17.
    1. Kuroda N,
    2. Hiramatsu H,
    3. Mori M, et al
    . Mechanical thrombectomy for Trousseau syndrome in a terminally ill cancer patient. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019;57:688–94 doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.327 pmid:30576713
  18. 18.
    1. Maezono-Kandori K,
    2. Ohara T,
    3. Fujinami J, et al
    . Elevated CA125 is related to stroke due to cancer-associated hypercoagulation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;30:106126 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106126 pmid:34592610
  19. 19.
    1. Adams HP,
    2. Bendixen BH,
    3. Kappelle L, et al
    . Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Stroke 1993;24:35–41 doi:10.1161/01.str.24.1.35 pmid:7678184
  20. 20.
    1. Beyeler M,
    2. Belachew NF,
    3. Kielkopf M, et al
    . Absence of susceptibility vessel sign in patients with malignancy-related acute ischemic stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Front Neurol 2022;13:930635 doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.930635 pmid:35911907
  21. 21.
    1. Finelli PF,
    2. Nouh A
    . Three-territory DWI acute infarcts: diagnostic value in cancer-associated hypercoagulation stroke (Trousseau syndrome). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2033–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4846 pmid:27365322
  22. 22.
    1. Rovira A,
    2. Orellana P,
    3. Alvarez-Sabín J, et al
    . Hyperacute ischemic stroke: middle cerebral artery susceptibility sign at echo-planar gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232:466–73 doi:10.1148/radiol.2322030273 pmid:15215546
  23. 23.
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Sanossian N,
    3. Yong WH, et al
    . CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke. Stroke 2011;42:1237–43 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605576 pmid:21393591
  24. 24.
    1. Sato Y,
    2. Ishibashi-Ueda H,
    3. Iwakiri T, et al
    . Thrombus components in cardioembolic and atherothrombotic strokes. Thromb Res 2012;130:278–80 doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2012.04.008 pmid:22542364
  25. 25.
    1. Ogata J,
    2. Yutani C,
    3. Otsubo R, et al
    . Heart and vessel pathology underlying brain infarction in 142 stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2008;63:770–81 doi:10.1002/ana.21401 pmid:18496843
  26. 26.
    1. Park H,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Ha J, et al
    . Histological features of intracranial thrombi in stroke patients with cancer. Ann Neurol 2019;86:143–49 doi:10.1002/ana.25495 pmid:31025392
  27. 27.
    1. Fu CH,
    2. Chen CH,
    3. Lin YH, et al
    . Fibrin and platelet-rich composition in retrieved thrombi hallmarks stroke with active cancer. Stroke 2020;51:3723–27 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032069 pmid:33138690
  28. 28.
    1. Varki A
    . Trousseau’s syndrome: multiple definitions and multiple mechanisms. Blood 2007;110:1723–29 doi:10.1182/blood-2006-10-053736 pmid:17496204
  29. 29.
    1. Hart RG,
    2. Diener HC,
    3. Coutts SB, et al
    . Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:429–38 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70310-7 pmid:24646875
  • Received February 16, 2024.
  • Accepted after revision May 27, 2024.
  • © 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire