Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurovascular/Stroke Imaging

Temporal Changes on Postgadolinium MR Vessel Wall Imaging Captures Enhancement Kinetics of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Plaques and Aneurysms

Abhinav Patel, Ramez N. Abdalla, Sammy Allaw, Donald R. Cantrell, Ali Shaibani, Frances Caprio, David M. Hasan, Ali Alaraj, Sean P. Polster, Timothy J. Carroll and Sameer A. Ansari
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2024, 45 (9) 1206-1213; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8370
Abhinav Patel
aFrom the Department of Radiology, (A.P., R.N.A., D.R.C., A.S., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramez N. Abdalla
aFrom the Department of Radiology, (A.P., R.N.A., D.R.C., A.S., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
bDepartment of Radiology (R.N.A.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ramez N. Abdalla
Sammy Allaw
cDepartment of Radiology (S.A., T.J.C.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald R. Cantrell
aFrom the Department of Radiology, (A.P., R.N.A., D.R.C., A.S., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
dDepartment of Neurology (D.R.C., A.S., F.C., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Shaibani
aFrom the Department of Radiology, (A.P., R.N.A., D.R.C., A.S., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
dDepartment of Neurology (D.R.C., A.S., F.C., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
eDepartment of Neurological Surgery (A.S., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ali Shaibani
Frances Caprio
dDepartment of Neurology (D.R.C., A.S., F.C., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Hasan
fDepartment of Neurological Surgery (D.M.H.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Alaraj
hDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine (A.A.), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ali Alaraj
Sean P. Polster
gDepartment of Neurological Surgery (S.P.P.), University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sean P. Polster
Timothy J. Carroll
cDepartment of Radiology (S.A., T.J.C.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Timothy J. Carroll
Sameer A. Ansari
aFrom the Department of Radiology, (A.P., R.N.A., D.R.C., A.S., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
dDepartment of Neurology (D.R.C., A.S., F.C., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
eDepartment of Neurological Surgery (A.S., S.A.A.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sameer A. Ansari
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Analysis of vessel wall contrast kinetics (ie, wash-in/washout) is a promising method for the diagnosis and risk-stratification of intracranial atherosclerotic disease plaque (ICAD-P) and the intracranial aneurysm walls (IA-W). We used black-blood MR imaging or MR vessel wall imaging to evaluate the temporal relationship of gadolinium contrast uptake kinetics in ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws compared with normal anatomic reference structures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with ICAD-Ps or IAs who underwent MR vessel wall imaging with precontrast, early postcontrast (5–15 minutes), and delayed postcontrast (20–30 minutes) 3D T1-weighted TSE sequences were retrospectively studied. ROIs of a standardized diameter (2 mm) were used to measure the signal intensities of the cavernous sinus, pituitary infundibulum, temporalis muscle, and choroid plexus. Point ROIs were used for ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws. All ROI signal intensities were normalized to white matter signal intensity obtained using ROIs of 10-mm diameter. Measurements were acquired on precontrast, early postcontrast, and delayed postcontrast 3D T1 TSE sequences for each patient.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

MR-VWI parameters for ICAD-Ps and IAs

RESULTS: Ten patients with 17 symptomatic ICAD-Ps and 30 patients with 34 IA-Ws were included and demonstrated persisting contrast uptake (P < .001) of 7.21% and 10.54% beyond the early phase (5–15 minutes postcontrast) and in the delayed phase (20–30 minutes postcontrast) on postcontrast MR vessel wall imaging. However, normal anatomic reference structures including the pituitary infundibulum and cavernous sinus demonstrated a paradoxical contrast washout in the delayed phase. In both ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws, the greatest percentage of quantitative enhancement (>70%–90%) occurred in the early phase of postcontrast imaging, consistent with the rapid contrast uptake kinetics of neurovascular pathology.

CONCLUSIONS: Using standard MR vessel wall imaging techniques, our results demonstrate the effects of gadolinium contrast uptake kinetics in ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws with extended accumulating enhancement into the delayed phase (> 15 minutes) as opposed to normal anatomic reference structures that conversely exhibit decreasing enhancement. Because these relative differences are used to assess qualitative patterns of ICAD-P and IA-W enhancement, our findings highlight the importance of standardizing acquisition time points and MR vessel wall imaging protocols to interpret pathologic enhancement for the risk stratification of cerebrovascular pathologies.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AWE
aneurysm wall enhancement
IA
intracranial aneurysm
IA-W
intracranial aneurysm wall
ICAD
intracranial atherosclerotic disease
ICAD-P
intracranial atherosclerotic disease plaque
Ktrans
volume transfer constant
SI
signal intensity
VWI
vessel wall imaging

Novel MRI techniques have been utilized to study the risk of cerebrovascular pathologies, including high resolution MR-VWI for lesion enhancement, functional MRI for contrast permeability/kinetics, and even molecular MRI for ferumoxytol uptake.1,2 Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a leading cause of acute ischemic stroke globally, with an incidence of 15%–30% in African Americans and 30%–50% in Asians. Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) have an incidence of approximately 2%–3%, with SAH secondary to aneurysm rupture, with a 35%–50% mortality rate.3⇓-5 There is evidence to suggest both ICAD6⇓-8 and IA9⇓⇓⇓⇓-14 development and symptomatology may be related to focal inflammatory pathways leading to vessel wall pathology and instability. Consequently, stratifying the risk of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke is imperative to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with each pathology and improve patient outcomes.

Conventional luminal imaging modalities such as CTA, MRA, and DSA have been used to evaluate neurovascular pathologies such as IAs, ICAD, and intracranial dissections. While these traditional imaging techniques resolve the size, shape, and changes in lumen diameter, these are nonspecific morphologic changes characteristic of many intracranial vasculopathies that cannot differentiate imaging features of ICAD plaque or aneurysm wall stability versus instability. Multiple studies have demonstrated the potential of high-resolution MR vessel wall imaging (VWI) modalities to provide additional physiologic information of vessel wall pathology.6 The use of MR VWI, in conjunction with luminal imaging techniques, has led to earlier detection and characterization of cerebrovascular pathologies and has aided in risk stratification.7,8

MR VWI with gadolinium contrast enhancement has been used as a biomarker of local ICAD plaques (ICAD-Ps) and intracranial aneurysm wall (IA-W) inflammation and permeability, associated with an increased likelihood of ischemic stroke and aneurysm rupture, respectively. Due to the interplay between inflammation and aneurysm remodeling,9 contrast enhancement of the IA-W has been identified as a surrogate for inflammation and subsequent aneurysm growth and rupture. Marchese et al,10 Pera et al,11 and Kurki et al12 have added to the growing body of evidence1,9 suggesting that the vascular biology of ruptured IAs is distinct from unruptured IAs—in all of these studies, inflammation has been identified as a key factor in the pathway to IA rupture. Gadolinium uptake into the wall and subsequent extravasation into the extraluminal space are associated with focal instability.2,13⇓-15 Moreover, a similar pattern of inflammation-linked instability has been observed in ICAD-Ps.16 Hence, MR VWI with gadolinium contrast has become an excellent tool for the quantitative evaluation of ICAD-Ps and IAs using enhancement as a biomarker of inflammation and/or increased permeability in high-risk lesions.

Traditionally, early contrast agent kinetics are evaluated with fast T1-weighted gradient-echo acquisitions. The rapid frame rates enable accurate quantification of arterial input functions and tissue curves, albeit at the expense of spatial resolution and bright blood signal. These evaluations typically require specialized acquisitions and post-processing software.2,16,18 With the wide availability of high-resolution 3D T1-weighted TSE, VWI protocols can be used to identify contrast uptake and even delayed kinetics in the arterial wall of normal and diseased vessels for risk stratification.

Despite the wide availability of high-quality 3D T1-weighted TSE scans and the prevalence of ICAD and IAs, no standardized protocol for VWI has been established, with imaging centers using different MR scanner settings, pulse sequence techniques, and timing of image acquisitions after contrast injection.6 Contrast timing is of particular importance because the utility of VWI is predicated on both precontrast and, more importantly, postcontrast T1-weighted sequences to characterize enhancement features associated with vessel wall inflammation.8,17 In this article, we aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively study the temporal changes of post-contrast enhancement intensity to better understand delayed contrast kinetics of pathologic-versus-physiologic enhancement in ICAD-Ps, IAs, and normal brain structures. We aimed to use these prospective kinetic studies to assess the optimal postcontrast image-acquisition timing and improve the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of black-blood 3D T1-weighted TSE imaging sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a single-center, institutional review board–approved, retrospective chart review of patients obtained from the PACS at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, a tertiary academic medical center. We included patients presenting with ischemic symptoms (acute or subacute ischemic stroke and/or TIA) with an attributable underlying intracranial stenosis (>50%) secondary to ICAD (patients, n = 16; plaques, n = 23) or patients with IAs (patients, n = 46; IAs, n = 67) who underwent MR VWI within 2 weeks of symptoms or presentation. Both patient populations were subjected to an interim MR VWI protocol used between August 2019 and September 2020, which included both early and delayed post-contrast enhancement scans. IAs adjacent to the cavernous sinus were excluded due to the limited ability to evaluate enhancement characteristics in proximity to intense enhancement (IAs, n = 4). Ruptured IAs or treated IAs (IAs, n = 7), IAs < 2mm (IAs, n = 17), and fusiform aneurysms were excluded (IAs, n = 2). Additionally, incomplete studies and studies with poor diagnostic value due to marked motion degradation were omitted (IAs, n = 3; plaques, n = 6).

MR VWI was performed using T1-weighted 3D black-blood TSE (sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using variable flip angle evolutions [SPACE; Siemens]) sequences and included a precontrast and 2 postcontrast acquisitions at different time points. These time points were defined as “early” (5–15 minutes) and “delayed” (20–30 minutes) after contrast administration (0.1 mmol/kg of Gadavist; Bayer Schering Pharma). All studies were performed on a 3T MR imaging scanner (Magnetom Skyra; Siemens). Additional MR VWI protocol parameters are summarized in Table 1.

Following identification of studies that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, qualitative and quantitative assessment of the presence and degree of contrast enhancement was performed on normal anatomic reference structures with varying physiologic enhancement and vascular characteristics (pituitary infundibulum, temporalis muscle midbelly fibrous band, cavernous sinus, and choroid plexus). Neurovascular pathology of interest (ICAD-P or IA-W) was also evaluated at both early and delayed postcontrast time points. Quantitative evaluation of the signal intensity (SI) of ICAD-P and IA-W enhancement was computed using ROIs at the site of maximum SI. For normal anatomic reference structures, the SIs of the aforementioned structures were evaluated using circular ROIs of a standardized diameter (2 mm) to serve as internal control values. For each postcontrast time point, 3 measurements were obtained for reference structures and neurovascular lesions, which were then averaged to obtain a mean SI. To account for the variances in the baseline SI of each MR imaging sequence, the mean SI of precontrast, early and delayed postcontrast images were normalized using mean precontrast, early and delayed postcontrast white matter SIs, respectively. The white matter SI was obtained using ROIs of 10 mm adjacent to the vascular lesion. In rare cases in which adjacent white matter could not be evaluated, white matter in the centrum semiovale with a ROI standardized diameter of 10 mm was used.

Normalized SI was defined as enhancement of neurovascular lesions relative to enhancement of adjacent white matter: Embedded Image

A neuroradiologist (R.N.A.) blinded to the clinical and imaging findings evaluated neurovascular lesions on MR VWI for subjective grading. Both ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws were assessed qualitatively, graded in binary form as “enhancing” or “nonenhancing” when comparing pre- versus postcontrast TI SPACE imaging. IAs were also measured for maximum aneurysm diameter size and graded for “regular” versus “irregular” saccular aneurysm morphology using both MR VWI and TOF-MRA imaging.

Following the descriptive statistical analysis of the data, normalized and unnormalized data were tabulated under 3 time points—precontrast, early, and delayed postcontrast—and repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the change in enhancement statistically. SPSS, Version 29 (IBM) was used to perform all statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Patient Demographics/Comorbidities

Seventeen ICAD-Ps in 10 patients and 34 IAs in 30 patients were evaluated after inclusion and exclusion criteria were fulfilled. The mean age of patients with ICAD-Ps was 71.3 (SD, 15.3) years (range, 46–90 years), and with IA, it was 63 (SD, 11.5) years (range, 32–81years). The mean size of IAs was 5 (SD, 3) mm (range, 2–18 mm). Six of 10 patients with ICAD-Ps had MR DWI findings of acute or subacute ischemic stroke, whereas the remaining 4 patients presented with TIAs with negative findings on DWI scans. Table 2 summarizes patient demographics and screened comorbidities/vascular risk factors obtained via retrospective chart review.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Normalized mean Embedded Image and enhancement at early-versus-delayed MR VWI scanning time points

Figures 1–2 show representative imaging of intracranial aneurysms and ICAD-Ps using 3D TOF-MRA and precontrast and early and/or delayed postcontrast 3D TSE sequences.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

This series includes TOF-MRA scans (A and B) and precontrast (C) and postcontrast (D) T1-weighted 3D TSE sequences showing a 7 × 6 mm unruptured aneurysm in the left anterior cerebral artery (arrows). The delayed postcontrast image (D) reveals circumferential enhancement of the dome of the aneurysm, indicating wall instability, denoted by opposing white arrows.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

This series include precontrast (A), early postcontrast (B), and delayed postcontrast (C) T1 3D TSE sequences that demonstrates progressive enhancement of an ICAD plaque located in the right M1 segment of the right MCA in a patient presenting with an ischemic stroke in the corresponding vascular territory, suggestive of plaque instability. Note the excellent arterial blood flow (black-blood) suppression that allows focal identification of eccentric ICAD plaque enhancement (Plaques are annotated by a white arrow and magnified in box to demonstrate degree of enhancement in all of the above images).

Statistical Analysis

ICAD-Ps, IA-Ws, and normal anatomic reference structures showed a statistically significant (P < .001) increase in normalized mean signal intensity (Embedded Image or enhancement from precontrast to early and delayed postcontrast scans on T1 SPACE sequences. There was also a statistically significant increase in Embedded Image or further contrast enhancement in ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws (P < .001) between early and delayed imaging. In contrast, there was a statistically significant decrease in Embedded Image or relative loss of contrast enhancement in the cavernous sinus (P < .001) and the pituitary infundibulum (P < .001) from early-to-delayed imaging. The temporalis muscle and choroid plexus tissue showed no significant change in enhancement between early and delayed contrast phases (P = .195 and P = .711, respectively). The normalized mean Embedded Image of both neurovascular lesions of interest (ICAD-P and IA-W) and anatomic reference structures are aggregated in Table 3. The unnormalized SI values are recorded in the Online Supplemental Data. The temporal evolution of gadolinium enhancement is plotted in Figs 3 and 4.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Temporal evolution of contrast enhancement of ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws, and normal anatomic reference structures. Double asterisks indicate P < .05 for early-to-delayed Δ(Embedded Image ).

FIG 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4.

Temporal evolution of contrast enhancement of ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws and normal anatomic reference structures. Precontrast-to-early and early-to-delayed phase Δ(Embedded Image ), representing raw normalized changes in SI between phases. Double asterisks indicate P < .05 for early-to-delayed Δ(Embedded Image ). All precontrast-to-early changes are statistically significant and therefore not labeled.

ICAD-Ps demonstrated a mean Embedded Image of 0.947 before contrast administration, which increased to 1.762 on early postcontrast imaging and further increased to 1.889 on delayed imaging, a 7.21% increase in enhancement between the early and delayed phases. Following a similar trend, IAs demonstrated a mean Embedded Image of 0.838 precontrast, increasing to 1.177 in the early phase and further increasing to 1.301 in delayed-phase imaging, indicating a 10.54% increase in Embedded Image between the early and delayed phases.

Conversely, Embedded Image of the pituitary infundibulum decreased from 1.925 to 1.752 (−8.99%) and that of the cavernous sinus decreased from 1.886 to 1.736 (−7.95%) between early and delayed phases, indicating contrast washout. The Embedded Image of the temporalis muscle and choroid plexus tissue minimally decreased from 0.787 to 0.756 and 1.522 to 1.484, respectively, neither of which decrease was statistically significant.

We qualitatively categorized high- versus low-risk IAs by the presence or absence of aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE), size > 5 or < 5 mm, and morphology (irregular or regular shape), respectively.19 Irrespective of high- or low-risk IA features, a significant increase in Embedded Image persisted from the early-to-delayed postcontrast imaging (Table 3), even in patients who qualitatively demonstrated no AWE (quantitative Embedded Image 0.969 early versus 1.036 delayed with a 6.91% increase; P = .048). After we further stratified contrast enhancement by IA size (Fig 5), IA size <5 mm demonstrated a significant increase in contrast enhancement from early (Embedded Image 1.141) to delayed (Embedded Image 1.239) imaging with an 8.6% increase. IA size is discussed in Fig 5. Aneurysms of >5 mm exhibited a larger increase in Embedded Image from pre- to early postcontrast imaging, consistent with a faster rate of contrast uptake/permeability. Although all aneurysms continue to demonstrate increasing Embedded Image from early to delayed postcontrast imaging, this increase is more prominent in smaller aneurysms (<5 mm), reaching steady-state levels after a relatively slower rate of contrast uptake, suggesting differential contrast uptake kinetics in high- versus low-risk aneurysms by size.

FIG 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5.

Kinetics of IA-Ws enhancement stratified by aneurysm size. Increase (Embedded Image ) in IA wall from pre- to early postcontrast imaging correlates with aneurysm size, though a continuous increase in (Embedded Image ) from early-to-delayed postcontrast imaging occurs in all aneurysms. Larger aneurysms (>5 mm) demonstrate a greater increase in (Embedded Image ) on both pre- to early postcontrast imaging and early-to-delayed imaging, accounting for differential rates of contrast uptake/permeability. Double asterisks indicate P < .05 for early-to-delayed Δ(Embedded Image ).

DISCUSSION

Our MR VWI study indicates that symptomatic ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws accumulate gadolinium contrast beyond the early-phase (5–15 minutes) imaging with contrast uptake/permeability continuing into the delayed phase (20–30 minutes). de Havenon et al20 reported similar findings in their study of enhancement of ICAD-Ps that demonstrated the highest degree of enhancement in the cohort correlated with the longest duration between contrast injection and image acquisition. However, this temporal enhancement pattern was not corroborated in the same patients across time and prompted us to transiently alter our MR VWI imaging protocols between August 2019 and September 2020. Because we studied this phenomenon for any clinical impact, we performed a retrospective institutional review board–approved study to quantitatively assess these temporal enhancement patterns of ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws in comparison with normal anatomic reference structures.

High-resolution black-blood MR VWI techniques are being increasingly adopted to clinically diagnose and stratify the risk of various neurovascular pathologies, notably ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws (cerebral aneurysm), without the need for functional MR imaging and specialized postprocessing software for dynamic contrast enhancement–based permeability techniques used in the research domain.15,16,18 By means of standard black-blood T1-weighted 3D TSE sequences, imaging findings of T1-hyperintense signal abnormality and/or contrast enhancement of ICAD-Ps or IA-Ws can suggest unstable neurovascular pathology. In fact, MR VWI postcontrast enhancement may provide an imaging biomarker of focal inflammation, neoangiogenesis, and/or increased permeability found in the pathogenesis of symptomatic ruptured ICAD-Ps or thin-walled IA-Ws. Previous studies have established the histologic correlation between macrophage-mediated inflammation of atherosclerotic plaques and early-phase (5–15 minutes) contrast absorption. More advanced functional MR imaging studies have examined the correlation between macrophage infiltration of carotid atherosclerotic plaques with the volume transfer constant (Ktrans),2,21 a quantitative measure of the permeability across the vascular wall, with Kerwin et al21 computing the correlation between Ktrans and macrophage concentration at r = 0.75.2 Because Ktrans determines a transfer rate of contrast from the intravascular lumen to the extravascular extracellular space, we hypothesize that the continued absorption into the delayed phase in ICAD-Ps and IAs is related to accumulation of contrast extraluminally. Vakil et al16,18 demonstrated that similar contrast uptake kinetic measurements of Ktrans can also be acquired from ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws and that increased Ktrans permeability was associated with symptomatic ICAD-Ps and high-risk cerebral aneurysms.16,18

It is unclear whether contrast enhancement is limited to the inflammatory state of symptomatic unstable ICAD-Ps or IA-Ws, because confounding mechanisms may include neoangiogenesis or endothelial dysfunction/permeability. Computational fluid dynamics studies maintain that hemodynamic conditions lead to altered wall shear stress, which, in turn, leads to recruitment of invading macrophages through monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression.22 However, regardless of the cause of IA inflammation, inflammation plays a central role in chronic endothelial dysfunction and intramural pathology, with both ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws demonstrating persistent leakage of gadolinium contrast into the delayed phase.

In this study, our goal was to explore the temporal enhancement of ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws in the early and delayed phases on postcontrast MR VWI sequences and derive insight into the optimal timing for image-acquisition postcontrast infusion and any diagnostic impact relative to normal anatomic reference structures. We discovered that >70%–90% of contrast enhancement of both neurovascular pathologies occurs in the early phase (5–15 minutes), but contrast uptake and accumulation indeed continue into the delayed phase (20–30 minutes). Furthermore, early contrast kinetics are integral to capturing the rate and variability of pathologic contrast enhancement as suggested even in our study when stratifying high-risk, >5 mm IAs, suggesting that optimum clinical MR VWI protocols should initiate postcontrast scanning immediately after gadolinium infusion in the early phase.

Finally, the pituitary infundibulum is the most commonly used reference structure for the qualitative grading of enhancement in ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws.23,24 As shown in Fig 1, the Embedded Image increase in ICAD-Ps mimics the rise of the pituitary stalk between the precontrast and early-phase postcontrast imaging. However, unlike the pituitary stalk and other normal anatomic reference structures, ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws show a unique feature of gradual contrast uptake and continuous enhancement into the delayed phase. Because these reference structures exhibit paradoxical contrast washout (renal excretion) in the delayed phase with a drop in signal intensity, this can artificially elevate the qualitative enhancement grading of ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws relative to the pituitary stalk. Furthermore, smaller <5 -mm IAs may have decreased contrast uptake compared with high-risk, larger >5-mm IAs or symptomatic ICAD-Ps in the early phase (Fig 5) but then accumulate contrast in the delayed phase, limiting the diagnostic differentiation, qualitatively and quantitatively, in the delayed phase.

Our study had several limitations, including a small sample size of patients, especially with ICAD-Ps, that could affect the generalizability of the findings. Second, this was a single-center retrospective study with inherent bias of an MR VWI protocol that was transiently evaluated for a year, and it would be difficult to augment or reproduce these data without a formal prospective study. The lack of extended follow-up data and patient outcomes in our study limits the assessment of the frequency and impact of clinically relevant changes with time. Additionally, the data for both ICAD-Ps and IAs were restricted to mostly symptomatic lesions because patients were selected for follow-up MR VWI imaging on the basis of a symptomatic clinical picture or to guide conservative-versus-therapeutic interventions. Therefore, the asymptomatic ICAD-Ps were not evaluated and attempts at stratifying IAs into high-risk and low-risk groups on the basis of morphology and other factors may not yield demonstrable differences in contrast kinetics. Finally, our study was limited to postcontrast image acquisitions at 2 time intervals, early (5–15 minutes) and delayed (20–30 minutes), restricting the evaluation of contrast dynamics across a longer duration. Overall, a prospective multicenter study with both symptomatic and asymptomatic cerebrovascular pathologies preferably with a greater number of serial postcontrast T1-weighted 3D TSE sequences should be undertaken to minimize bias and enhance generalizability to better assess the peak time of enhancement and its correlation with clinical outcomes, and it would help with the issue of standardization in MR VWI protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws demonstrate continuous temporal enhancement on MR VWI by accumulating gadolinium contrast from the early into the delayed phases, probably related to pathologic leakage/permeability across time. The contrast kinetics of these neurovascular pathologies suggest that delayed-phase imaging (>15 minutes) could be misleading and demonstrate nonspecific enhancement in most ICAD-Ps and IA-Ws, especially relative to normal anatomic reference structures that exhibit paradoxical contrast washout on delayed imaging. MR VWI protocols should be standardized with postcontrast imaging acquired as soon as possible after gadolinium infusion to optimize the diagnostic accuracy in risk stratification of neurovascular pathology.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 2: Baseline patient demographics and comorbiditiesa

Footnotes

  • ↵‡ Abhinav Patel and Ramez N. Abdalla had equal contribution as co-first authors.

  • This study was funded by National Institutes of Health grants 1R21HL130969 (S.A.A.) and 1R01NS114632 (S.A.A., T.J.C.) of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hasan D,
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Jabbour P, et al
    . Early change in ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging signal suggests unstable human cerebral aneurysm: a pilot study. Stroke 2012;43:3258–65 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673400 pmid:23138441
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kerwin WS,
    2. O’Brien KD,
    3. Ferguson MS, et al
    . Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study. Radiology 2006;241:459–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.2412051336 pmid:16966482
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Meng R,
    3. Liu G, et al
    . Intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Neurobiol Dis 2019;124:118–32 doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2018.11.008 pmid:30439443
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Vlak MH,
    2. Algra A,
    3. Brandenburg R, et al
    . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:626–36 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 pmid:21641282
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wiebers DO,
    2. Whisnant JP,
    3. Huston J, 3rd., et al
    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Song JW,
    2. Moon BF,
    3. Burke MP, et al
    . MR intracranial vessel wall imaging: a systematic review. J Neuroimaging 2020;30:428–42 doi:10.1111/jon.12719 pmid:32391979
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Young CC,
    2. Bonow RH,
    3. Barros G, et al
    . Magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging in cerebrovascular diseases. Neurosurg Focus 2019;47:E4 doi:10.3171/2019.9.FOCUS19599 pmid:31846249
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Alexander MD,
    2. Yuan C,
    3. Rutman A, et al
    . High-resolution intracranial vessel wall imaging: imaging beyond the lumen. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016;87:589–97 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-312020 pmid:26746187
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Frösen J,
    2. Piippo A,
    3. Paetau A, et al
    . Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases. Stroke 2004;35:2287–93 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000140636.30204.da pmid:15322297
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Marchese E,
    2. Vignati A,
    3. Albanese A, et al
    . Comparative evaluation of genome-wide gene expression profiles in ruptured and unruptured human intracranial aneurysms. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2010;24:185–95 pmid:20487632
    PubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pera J,
    2. Korostynski M,
    3. Krzyszkowski T, et al
    . Gene expression profiles in human ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:224–31 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.562009 pmid:20044533
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kurki MI,
    2. Häkkinen SK,
    3. Frösen J, et al
    . Upregulated signaling pathways in ruptured human saccular intracranial aneurysm wall: an emerging regulative role of toll-like receptor signaling and nuclear factor-κB, hypoxia-inducible factor-1A, and ETS transcription factors. Neurosurgery 2011;68:1667–76 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318210f001 pmid:21336216
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Vergouwen MD,
    2. Backes D,
    3. van der Schaaf IC, et al
    . Gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall in unruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of aneurysm instability: a follow-up study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1112–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6105 pmid:31221634
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wang G,
    2. Xian Wen L,
    3. Lei S, et al
    . Wall enhancement ratio and partial wall enhancement on MRI associated with the rupture of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;10:566–70 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013308 pmid:28918385
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gariel F,
    2. Ben Hassen W,
    3. Boulouis G, et al
    . Increased wall enhancement during follow-up as a predictor of subsequent aneurysmal growth. Stroke 2020;51:1868–72 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028431 pmid:32397927
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Vakil P,
    2. Elmokadem AH,
    3. Syed FH, et al
    . Quantifying intracranial plaque permeability with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;38:243–49 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4998 pmid:27856437
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Matouk CC,
    2. Mandell DM,
    3. Günel M, et al
    . Vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging identifies the site of rupture in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2013;72:492–96; discussion 496 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827d1012 pmid:23151622
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Vakil P,
    2. Ansari SA,
    3. Cantrell CG, et al
    . Quantifying intracranial aneurysm wall permeability for risk assessment using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:953–59 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4225 pmid:25655875
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lindgren AE,
    2. Koivisto T,
    3. Björkman J, et al
    . Irregular shape of intracranial aneurysm indicates rupture risk irrespective of size in a population-based cohort. Stroke 2016;47:1219–26 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012404 pmid:27073241
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. de Havenon A,
    2. Muhina HJ,
    3. Parker DL, et al
    . Effect of time elapsed since gadolinium administration on atherosclerotic plaque enhancement in clinical vessel wall MR imaging studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1709–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6191 pmid:31515211
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kerwin WS,
    2. Oikawa M,
    3. Yuan C, et al
    . MR imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum in carotid atherosclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:507–14 doi:10.1002/mrm.21532 pmid:18306402
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Frösen J,
    2. Cebral J,
    3. Robertson AM, et al
    . Flow-induced, inflammation-mediated arterial wall remodeling in the formation and progression of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2019;47:E21 doi:10.3171/2019.5.FOCUS19234 pmid:31261126
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Qiao Y,
    2. Zeiler SR,
    3. Mirbagheri S, et al
    . Intracranial plaque enhancement in patients with cerebrovascular events on high-spatial-resolution MR images. Radiology 2014;271:534–42 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122812 pmid:24475850
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lindenholz A,
    2. van der Kolk AG,
    3. Zwanenburg JJ, et al
    . The use and pitfalls of intracranial vessel wall imaging: how we do it. Radiology 2018;286:12–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162096 pmid:29261469
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received December 5, 2023.
  • Accepted after revision March 5, 2024.
  • © 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 45 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 45, Issue 9
1 Sep 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Temporal Changes on Postgadolinium MR Vessel Wall Imaging Captures Enhancement Kinetics of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Plaques and Aneurysms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Abhinav Patel, Ramez N. Abdalla, Sammy Allaw, Donald R. Cantrell, Ali Shaibani, Frances Caprio, David M. Hasan, Ali Alaraj, Sean P. Polster, Timothy J. Carroll, Sameer A. Ansari
Temporal Changes on Postgadolinium MR Vessel Wall Imaging Captures Enhancement Kinetics of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Plaques and Aneurysms
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2024, 45 (9) 1206-1213; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8370

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
MR Vessel Wall Imaging of Intracranial Plaques
Abhinav Patel, Ramez N. Abdalla, Sammy Allaw, Donald R. Cantrell, Ali Shaibani, Frances Caprio, David M. Hasan, Ali Alaraj, Sean P. Polster, Timothy J. Carroll, Sameer A. Ansari
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2024, 45 (9) 1206-1213; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8370
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Review of Intracranial Aneurysm Imaging Modalities, from CT to State-of-the-Art MR
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The insula and malignant cerebral edema
  • ICH Shape & Density Predict Rebleeding after MICE
  • Circle of Willis Variants and Stroke Outcomes
Show more Neurovascular/Stroke Imaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire