Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Index by author

April 01, 2018; Volume 39,Issue 4
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

  1. Vanjare, H.A.

    1. Adult Brain
      You have access
      Brain Imaging in Cases with Positive Serology for Dengue with Neurologic Symptoms: A Clinicoradiologic Correlation
      H.A. Vanjare, P. Mannam, A.K. Mishra, R. Karuppusami, R.A.B. Carey, A.M. Abraham, W. Rose, R. Iyyadurai and S. Mani
      American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2018, 39 (4) 699-703; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5544
  2. Van Obberghen, E.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult Brain
      Open Access
      Evaluation of the Sensitivity of Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer (ihMT) MRI for Multiple Sclerosis
      E. Van Obberghen, S. Mchinda, A. le Troter, V.H. Prevost, P. Viout, M. Guye, G. Varma, D.C. Alsop, J.-P. Ranjeva, J. Pelletier, O. Girard and G. Duhamel
      American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2018, 39 (4) 634-641; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5563

      Twenty-five patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 20 healthy volunteers were enrolled in a prospective study with a protocol including anatomic imaging, standard magnetization transfer, and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer imaging. Magnetization transfer and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratios measured in normal-appearing brain tissue and in MS lesions of patients were compared with values measured in controls. The magnetization transfer ratio and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratio measured in the thalami and frontal, occipital, and temporal WM of patients with MS were lower compared with those of controls. The sensitivity of the inhomogeneous magnetization transfer technique for MS was highlighted by the reduction in the inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratio in MS lesions and in normal-appearing WM of patients compared with controls.

  3. Vargas, M.I.

    1. Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
      You have access
      Normal Values of Magnetic Relaxation Parameters of Spine Components with the Synthetic MRI Sequence
      M. Drake-Pérez, B.M.A. Delattre, J. Boto, A. Fitsiori, K.-O. Lovblad, S. Boudabbous and M.I. Vargas
      American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2018, 39 (4) 788-795; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5566
  4. Varma, G.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult Brain
      Open Access
      Evaluation of the Sensitivity of Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer (ihMT) MRI for Multiple Sclerosis
      E. Van Obberghen, S. Mchinda, A. le Troter, V.H. Prevost, P. Viout, M. Guye, G. Varma, D.C. Alsop, J.-P. Ranjeva, J. Pelletier, O. Girard and G. Duhamel
      American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2018, 39 (4) 634-641; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5563

      Twenty-five patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 20 healthy volunteers were enrolled in a prospective study with a protocol including anatomic imaging, standard magnetization transfer, and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer imaging. Magnetization transfer and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratios measured in normal-appearing brain tissue and in MS lesions of patients were compared with values measured in controls. The magnetization transfer ratio and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratio measured in the thalami and frontal, occipital, and temporal WM of patients with MS were lower compared with those of controls. The sensitivity of the inhomogeneous magnetization transfer technique for MS was highlighted by the reduction in the inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratio in MS lesions and in normal-appearing WM of patients compared with controls.

  5. Varzaneh, F.N.

    1. You have access
      Revenue Increase following 2017 Multiple Procedures Payment Reduction Modification: Differential Impact on Neuroradiology—Report from an Academic Medical Center
      B.B. Noveiry, F.N. Varzaneh and D.M. Yousem
      American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2018, 39 (4) 612-617; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5555
  6. Verweij, B.H.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEADULT BRAIN
      Open Access
      Quantification of Intracranial Aneurysm Volume Pulsation with 7T MRI
      R. Kleinloog, J.J.M. Zwanenburg, B. Schermers, E. Krikken, Y.M. Ruigrok, P.R. Luijten, F. Visser, L. Regli, G.J.E. Rinkel and B.H. Verweij
      American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2018, 39 (4) 713-719; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5546

      Tenunruptured aneurysms in 9 patients were studied using a high-resolution 3D gradient-echo sequence with cardiac gating. Semiautomatic segmentation was used to measure aneurysm volume per cardiac phase. Aneurysm pulsation was defined as the relative increase in volume between the phase with the smallest volume and the phase with the largest volume. The accuracy and precision of the measured volume pulsations were addressed by digital phantom simulations and a repeat image analysis. In Stage II, the imaging protocol was optimized and 9 patients with 9 aneurysms were studied with and without administration of a contrast agent. Mean aneurysm pulsation in Stage I was 8%, with a mean volume change of 15 mm3. The artifactual volume pulsations measured with the digital phantom simulations were of the same magnitude as the volume pulsations observed in the patient data. Volume pulsation quantification with the current imaging protocol on 7T MR imaging is not accurate due to multiple imaging artifacts.

  7. Viout, P.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult Brain
      Open Access
      Evaluation of the Sensitivity of Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer (ihMT) MRI for Multiple Sclerosis
      E. Van Obberghen, S. Mchinda, A. le Troter, V.H. Prevost, P. Viout, M. Guye, G. Varma, D.C. Alsop, J.-P. Ranjeva, J. Pelletier, O. Girard and G. Duhamel
      American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2018, 39 (4) 634-641; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5563

      Twenty-five patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 20 healthy volunteers were enrolled in a prospective study with a protocol including anatomic imaging, standard magnetization transfer, and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer imaging. Magnetization transfer and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratios measured in normal-appearing brain tissue and in MS lesions of patients were compared with values measured in controls. The magnetization transfer ratio and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratio measured in the thalami and frontal, occipital, and temporal WM of patients with MS were lower compared with those of controls. The sensitivity of the inhomogeneous magnetization transfer technique for MS was highlighted by the reduction in the inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratio in MS lesions and in normal-appearing WM of patients compared with controls.

  8. Visser, F.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEADULT BRAIN
      Open Access
      Quantification of Intracranial Aneurysm Volume Pulsation with 7T MRI
      R. Kleinloog, J.J.M. Zwanenburg, B. Schermers, E. Krikken, Y.M. Ruigrok, P.R. Luijten, F. Visser, L. Regli, G.J.E. Rinkel and B.H. Verweij
      American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2018, 39 (4) 713-719; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5546

      Tenunruptured aneurysms in 9 patients were studied using a high-resolution 3D gradient-echo sequence with cardiac gating. Semiautomatic segmentation was used to measure aneurysm volume per cardiac phase. Aneurysm pulsation was defined as the relative increase in volume between the phase with the smallest volume and the phase with the largest volume. The accuracy and precision of the measured volume pulsations were addressed by digital phantom simulations and a repeat image analysis. In Stage II, the imaging protocol was optimized and 9 patients with 9 aneurysms were studied with and without administration of a contrast agent. Mean aneurysm pulsation in Stage I was 8%, with a mean volume change of 15 mm3. The artifactual volume pulsations measured with the digital phantom simulations were of the same magnitude as the volume pulsations observed in the patient data. Volume pulsation quantification with the current imaging protocol on 7T MR imaging is not accurate due to multiple imaging artifacts.

Back to top
PreviousNext

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 39 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 39, Issue 4
1 Apr 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Sign up for alerts
Advertisement
  • Letters
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
Loading
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire