Table 1:

Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between patients treated with flow diversion and those treated with conventional coilinga

CharacteristicsFlow Diversion (n = 49)Conventional Coiling (n = 30)P Value
Radiologic outcomes
 Initial occlusion grade
  Not available49 (100%)<.001
  Complete13 (43.5%)
  Remnant neck8 (26.7%)
  Sac filling9 (30%)
 One-year follow-up occlusion grade (flow-diversion coiling).154
  OKM D/complete or near-complete28 (62.2%)13 (46.4%)
  OKM C/remnant neck12 (26.7%)7 (25%)
  OKM A and B/sac filling5 (11.1%)8 (28.6%)
 Recurrence during follow-up0 (0%)12 (40%)<.001
 Retreatment6 (12.2%)7 (23.3%).197
 Mean follow-up period (mo)30.3 (SD, 18.7)40.8 (SD, 25.6).111
Clinical outcomes
 Cranial nerve symptom change.046
  Improved15 (60%)3 (25%)
  Worsened or sustained10 (40%)9 (75%)
 mRS ≥2 at discharge2 (4.1%)0 (0%).262
 mRS ≥2 at last follow-up5 (10.2%)0 (0%).071
 Mean follow-up period (mo)33.0 (SD, 21.1)45.9 (SD, 35.8).073
  • a Data are mean or No. (%).