Table 4:

Statistical analyses of the Bland-Altman plots comparing all techniques against DSA rotation “near” images

Statistics/TechniqueArithmetic Mean Differences (95% CI)Lower Limit (95% CI)Upper Limit (95% CI)
FDCTA MPR−0.64 (−0.91 to −0.37)−3.14 (−3.60 to −2.68)1.86 (1.40–2.32)
FDCTA VRT−0.67 (−0.86 to −0.49)−2.37 (−2.68 to −2.06)1.02 (0.71–1.33)
MDCTA MPR−0.84 (−1.05 to −0.62)−2.89 (−3.27 to −2.52)1.22 (0.85–1.60)
MDCTA VRT−1.34 (−1.56 to −1.13)−3.37 (−3.74 to −2.99)0.68 (0.31–1.05)
DSA long−0.48 (−0.63 to −0.33)−1.90 (−2.16 to −1.64)0.94 (0.68–1.20)
DSA middle−0.51 (−0.67 to −0.36)−1.98 (−2.25 to −1.71)0.95 (0.68–1.22)
DSA near−0.58 (−0.75 to −0.41)−2.15 (−2.44 to −1.86)0.99 (0.70–1.28)
3D DSA MPR−0.72 (−0.98 to −0.46)−3.19 (−3.64 to −2.74)1.75 (1.30–2.20)
3D DSA VRT−0.86 (−1.03 to −0.69)−2.49 (−2.9 to −2.19)0.77 (0.47–1.07)
DSA rotation long0.89 (−0.04 to −0.21)−1.13 (−1.36 to −0.91)1.31 (1.09–1.54)
DSA rotation middle0.01 (−0.08 to −11)−0.89 (−1.05 to −0.71)0.91 (0.75–1.08)