Impact of delay of MR imaging to predict neurologic evolution
MR Imaging Class | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | ||
No. of images | 10 | 15 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 64 |
Sensitivity (%) | 89 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 98 |
Specificity (%) | 100 | 75 | 33 | 20 | 0 | 35 |
False positive | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
False negative | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Positive predictive value (%) | 100 | 92 | 85 | 83 | 33 | 81 |
Negative predictive value (%) | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 86 |
Overall accuracy (%) | 90 | 93 | 86 | 79 | 33 | 81 |
Note.—A indicates MR imaging on days 1–3; B, MR imaging on days 4–7; C, MR imaging on days 8–15; D, MR imaging on days 16–50; E, MR imaging after day 50.