Table 2:

Comparative analysis of the spectrum of imaging findings across the 18q chromosome abnormalities

18q- Group (n = 23)Ring chromosome 18 Group (n = 4)Trisomy 18 Group (Trisomy 18 n = 7, Tetrasomy 18 n = 1)P Value
Number of MRIs (n = 49)34 (69)5 (10)10 (21)-
Age at MR imaging51.8 (17.8–114.4)18.1 (14.9–212.2)6.8 (0.17–43.7).06
Abnormal white matter25 (74)5 (100)5 (50).11
PMD-like pattern4 (12)1 (20)2 (20).37
Intermediate pattern7 (21)2 (40)2 (20)
Washed-out pattern14 (41)2 (40)1 (10)
Normal9 (26)05 (50)
Myelination lag17.2 (3.3–19.6)27.0 (19.2–33.0)9.0 (3.0–15.1).005 (18 ring vs 18 trisomy) .03 (18 ring vs 18q-)
Multifocal white matter hyperintensities03 (60)1 (10).001 (18 ring vs others)
APD pons (mm)18.5 (16.9–19.4)15.3 (15.2–19.5)13.0 (10.4–17.3).002 (18 trisomy vs 18q-)
Pons APD <3rd percentile3 (9)0 (0)7 (70)<.001 (18 trisomy vs others)
Pons/FOD ratio0.13 (0.12–0.14)0.13 (0.12–0.14)0.11 (0.10–0.12).002 (18 trisomy vs 18q-) .02 (18 trisomy vs 18 ring)
CCD vermis (mm)41.8 (37.1–45.7)38.8 (36.8–43.5)27.6 (19.4–35.0)<.001 (18 trisomy vs 18q-)
CCD vermis <3rd percentile7 (21)0 (0)7 (70).003 (18 trisomy vs others)
CCD vermis/FOD ratio0.30 (0.27–0.33)0.31 (0.30–0.35)0.23 (0.19–0.25)<.001 (18 trisomy vs 18q-) .002 (18 trisomy vs 18 ring)
TCD (mm)88.4 (81.7–94.3)78.2 (72.2–87.9)63.9 (47.6–88.3).04
TCD/FOD ratio0.65 (0.59–0.68)0.63 (0.59–0.72)0.56 (0.49–0.63).06
  • Note:—Numbers in brackets indicate percentages and interquartile range as applicable.