PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Mukherji, S K
AU  - Tart, R P
AU  - Fitzsimmons, J
AU  - Belden, C
AU  - McGorray, S
AU  - Guy, J
AU  - Mancuso, A A
TI  - Fat-suppressed MR of the orbit and cavernous sinus: comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo.
DP  - 1994 Oct 01
TA  - American Journal of Neuroradiology
PG  - 1707--1714
VI  - 15
IP  - 9
4099  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/15/9/1707.short
4100  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/15/9/1707.full
SO  - Am. J. Neuroradiol.1994 Oct 01; 15
AB  - PURPOSE To compare T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo imaging with fat-suppressed conventional spin-echo imaging in the detection of normal intraorbital and pericavernous anatomy and orbital disease, and to determine the efficacy of fat saturation with T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging of the cavernous sinus. METHODS Contrast-to-noise ratios of normal intraorbital anatomy were calculated and compared in 10 consecutive patients using fat-suppressed fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo T2-weighted images. Contrast-to-noise ratios of common intraorbital lesions were calculated and compared using fat-suppressed fast spin-echo and fat-suppressed conventional spin-echo. Qualitative evaluation was performed and compared for normal intraorbital anatomy using both fat-suppressed fast spin-echo and fat-suppressed conventional spin-echo in 16 patients. Qualitative evaluation for the detection of normal anatomic structures of the pericavernous region was performed and compared using fast spin-echo with and without fat suppression and fat-suppressed conventional spin-echo T2-weighted images in 16 patients. Fat saturation was performed using standard commercially available chemical saturation technique. RESULTS Reduced imaging time allowed more acquisitions for fat-suppressed fast spin-echo images, which significantly improved visibility of intraorbital and pericavernous anatomy over fat-suppressed conventional spin-echo. Anatomic visibility was also improved because of reduced motion, phase encoding, and susceptibility artifacts. There was no significant difference between contrast-to-noise ratios for fat-suppressed fast spin-echo and fat-suppressed conventional spin-echo imaging of the lateral and medial rectus muscles. Contrast-to-noise ratios of fat suppressed fast spin-echo of orbital disease was significantly greater than contrast-to-noise ratios of fat-suppressed conventional spin-echo. Detection of several normal anatomic structures of the pericavernous region was significantly improved with non-fat-suppressed fast spin-echo over fat-suppressed fast spin-echo because of significantly reduced magnetic susceptibility artifact. CONCLUSIONS Fat-suppressed fast spin-echo is superior to fat-suppressed conventional spin-echo for T2-weighted orbital imaging. Non-fat-suppressed fast spin-echo is the preferred pulse sequence for T2-weighted imaging of the cavernous sinus because of the minimal susceptibility artifact.