RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Validation of a New Semiautomated Segmentation Pipeline Based on the Spinal Cord Toolbox DeepSeg Algorithm to Estimate the Cervical Canal Area
JF American Journal of Neuroradiology
JO Am. J. Neuroradiol.
FD American Society of Neuroradiology
SP 867
OP 872
DO 10.3174/ajnr.A7899
VO 44
IS 7
A1 Mongay-Ochoa, N.
A1 Pareto, D.
A1 Alberich, M.
A1 Tintore, M.
A1 Montalban, X.
A1 Rovira, À.
A1 Sastre-Garriga, J.
YR 2023
UL http://www.ajnr.org/content/44/7/867.abstract
AB BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As in the brain reserve concept, a larger cervical canal area may also protect against disability. In this context, a semiautomated pipeline has been developed to obtain quantitative estimations of the cervical canal area. The aim of the study was to validate the pipeline, to evaluate the consistency of the cervical canal area measurements during a 1-year period, and to compare cervical canal area estimations obtained from brain and cervical MRI acquisitions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight healthy controls and 18 patients with MS underwent baseline and follow-up 3T brain and cervical spine sagittal 3D MPRAGE. The cervical canal area was measured in all acquisitions, and estimations obtained with the proposed pipeline were compared with manual segmentations performed by 1 evaluator using the Dice similarity coefficient. The cervical canal area estimations obtained on baseline and follow-up T1WI were compared; brain and cervical cord acquisitions were also compared using the individual and average intraclass correlation coefficients.RESULTS: The agreement between the manual cervical canal area masks and the masks provided by the proposed pipeline was excellent, with a mean Dice similarity coefficient mean of 0.90 (range, 0.73–0.97). The cervical canal area estimations obtained from baseline and follow-up scans showed a good level of concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44–0.88); estimations obtained from brain and cervical MRIs also had good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45–0.90).CONCLUSIONS: The proposed pipeline is a reliable tool to estimate the cervical canal area. The cervical canal area is a stable measure across time; moreover, when cervical sequences are not available, the cervical canal area could be estimated using brain T1WI.CCaAcervical canal areaFAflip angleGTground truthHChealthy controlsICCintraclass correlation coefficientLoAlimits of agreementpwMSpatients with multiple sclerosisSCTSpinal Cord ToolboxSDstandard deviation