Enhancing Annular Fissures and High-Intensity Zones: Pain, Internal Derangement, and Anesthetic Response at Provocation Lumbar Discography

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Weishaupt D,
   2. Zanetti M,
   3. Hodler J, et al

   . MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology 1998;209:661–66 doi:10.1148/radiology.209.3.9844656 pmid:9844656

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Stadnik TW,
   2. Lee RR,
   3. Coen HL, et al

   . Annular tears and disk herniation: prevalence and contrast enhancement on MR images in the absence of low back pain or sciatica. Radiology 1998;206:49–55 doi:10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423651 pmid:9423651

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Jarvik JJ,
   2. Hollingworth W,
   3. Heagerty P, et al

   . The Longitudinal Assessment of Imaging and Disability of the Back (LAIDBack) study: baseline data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1158–66 doi:10.1097/00007632-200105150-00014 pmid:11413431

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Aprill C,
   2. Bogduk N

   . High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1992;65:361–69 doi:10.1259/0007-1285-65-773-361 pmid:1535257

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Schellhas KP,
   2. Pollei SR,
   3. Gundry CR, et al

   . Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:79–86 doi:10.1097/00007632-199601010-00018 pmid:9122767

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Saifuddin A,
   2. Braithwaite I,
   3. White J, et al

   . The value of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in the demonstration of annular tears. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:453–57 doi:10.1097/00007632-199802150-00009 pmid:9516700

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Carragee EJ,
   2. Paragioudakis SJ,
   3. Khurana S

   . 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2987–92 doi:10.1097/00007632-200012010-00005 pmid:11145809

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Chen JY,
   2. Ding Y,
   3. Lv RY, et al

   . Correlation between MR imaging and discography with provocative concordant pain in patients with low back pain. Clin J Pain 2011;27:125–30 doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181fb2203 pmid:21268300

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Fang C,
   2. Zhang W,
   3. Chen L, et al

   . The correlation between the high-intensity zone on a T2-weighted MRI and positive outcomes of discography: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2017;12:26 doi:10.1186/s13018-017-0523-1 pmid:28178999

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Chelala L,
    2. Trent G,
    3. Waldrop G, et al

    . Positive predictive values of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging findings for provocative discography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019;43:568–71 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000885 pmid:31310594

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Peng B,
    2. Hou S,
    3. Wu W, et al

    . The pathogenesis and clinical significance of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) of lumbar intervertebral disc on MR imaging in the patient with discogenic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2006;15:583–87 doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0892-8 pmid:16047210

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Saifuddin A,
    2. Mitchell R,
    3. Taylor BA

    . Extradural inflammation associated with annular tears: demonstration with gadolinium-enhanced lumbar spine MRI. Eur Spine J 1999;8:34–39 doi:10.1007/s005860050124 pmid:10190852

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Ross JS,
    2. Modic MT,
    3. Masaryk TJ

    . Tears of the anulus fibrosus: assessment with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:159–62 doi:10.2214/ajr.154.1.2136783 pmid:2136783

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Pfirrmann CW,
    2. Metzdorf A,
    3. Zanetti M, et al

    . Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1873–78 doi:10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011 pmid:11568697

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Walsh TR,
    2. Weinstein JN,
    3. Spratt KF, et al

    . Lumbar discography in normal subjects: a controlled, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1081–88 doi:10.2106/00004623-199072070-00019 pmid:2384508

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Bartynski WS,
    2. Rothfus WE

    . Pain improvement after intradiskal lidocaine administration in provocation lumbar diskography: association with diskographic contrast leakage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1259–65 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0559 pmid:17698525

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Derby R,
    2. Lee SH,
    3. Lee JE, et al

    . Comparison of pressure-controlled provocation discography using automated versus manual syringe pump manometry in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain Med 2011;12:18–26 doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00990.x pmid:21040439

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Bartynski WS,
    2. Agarwal V,
    3. Khan AS, et al

    . Motion characteristics of the functional spinal unit during lumbar disc injection (discography) including comparison between normal and degenerative levels. Pain Med 2021;22:1735–42 doi:10.1093/pm/pnab121 pmid:33823017

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Bartynski WS,
    2. Rothfus WE,
    3. Kurs-Lasky M

    . Postdiskogram CT features of lidocaine-sensitive and lidocaine-insensitive severely painful disks at provocation lumbar diskography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1455–60 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1151 pmid:18599578

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Sachs BL,
    2. Vanharanta H,
    3. Spivey MA, et al

    . Dallas discogram description: a new classification of CT/discography in low-back disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:287–94 doi:10.1097/00007632-198704000-00018 pmid:2954226

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Bartynski WS,
    2. Rothfus WE

    . Peripheral disc margin shape and internal disc derangement: imaging correlation in significantly painful discs identified at provocation lumbar discography. Interv Neuroradiol 2012;18:227–41 doi:10.1177/159101991201800217 pmid:22681741

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Coppes MH,
    2. Marani E,
    3. Thomeer RT, et al

    . Innervation of “painful” lumbar discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:2342–49; discussion 2349–50 doi:10.1097/00007632-199710150-00005 pmid:9355214

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Fagan AB,
    2. Sarvestani G,
    3. Moore RJ, et al

    . Innervation of anulus tears: an experimental animal study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:1200–05 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c02812 pmid:20445481

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Munter FM,
    2. Wasserman BA,
    3. Wu HM, et al

    . Serial MR imaging of annular tears in lumbar intervertebral disks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1105–09 pmid:12169465

    PubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Derby R,
    2. Lee JE,
    3. Lee SH

    . Analgesic discography: effect of adding a local anesthetic to routine lumbar provocation discography. Pain Med 2010;11:1335–42 doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00930.x pmid:20735752

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Derby R,
    2. Aprill CN,
    3. Lee JE, et al

    . Comparison of four different analgesic discogram protocols comparing the incidence of reported pain relief following local anesthetic injection into concordantly painful lumbar intervertebral discs. Pain Med 2012;13:1547–53 doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01499.x pmid:23110310

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Hirsch C,
    2. Schajowicz F

    . Studies on structural changes in the lumbar annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand 1952;22:184–231 doi:10.3109/17453675208989006 pmid:13079741

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. McCarron RF,
    2. Wimpee MW,
    3. Hudkins PG, et al

    . The inflammatory effect of nucleus pulposus: a possible element in the pathogenesis of low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:760–64 doi:10.1097/00007632-198710000-00009 pmid:2961088

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Ross JS,
    2. Modic MT,
    3. Masaryk TJ, et al

    . Assessment of extradural degenerative disease with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:151–57 doi:10.2214/ajr.154.1.2104701 pmid:2104701

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Boos N,
    2. Semmer N,
    3. Elfering A, et al

    . Natural history of individuals with asymptomatic disc abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging: predictors of low back pain-related medical consultation and work incapacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1484–92 doi:10.1097/00007632-200006150-00006 pmid:10851096

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Avramov AI,
    2. Cavanaugh JM,
    3. Ozaktay CA, et al

    . The effects of controlled mechanical loading on group-II, III, and IV afferent units from the lumbar facet joint and surrounding tissue: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1464–71 pmid:1469006

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Yamashita T,
    2. Cavanaugh JM,
    3. Ozaktay AC, et al

    . Effect of substance P on mechanosensitive units of tissues around and in the lumbar facet joint. J Orthop Res 1993;11:205–14 doi:10.1002/jor.1100110208 pmid:7683334

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Ohtori S,
    2. Takahashi K,
    3. Chiba T, et al

    . Phenotypic inflammation switch in rats shown by calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactive dorsal root ganglion neurons innervating the lumbar facet joints. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1009–13 doi:10.1097/00007632-200105010-00005 pmid:11337618

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Cousins MJ,
    2. Horlocker TT,
    3. Bridenbaugh PO

    1. Siddall PJ,
    2. Cousins MJ

    . Introduction to pain mechanisms: implications for neural blockade. In: Cousins MJ, Horlocker TT, Bridenbaugh PO. Neural Blockade In Clinical Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Fourth Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009:661–692. https://aneskey.com/introduction-to-pain-mechanisms-implications-for-neural-blockade/. Accessed December 11, 2022
35. 35.↵
    1. Woolf CJ

    . Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain 2011;152:S2–15 doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030 pmid:20961685

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science