Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Volumetric Changes in the Choroid Plexus Associated with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension in Patients with Spinal CSF Leak

William A. Mehan, Neo Poyiadji, Aaron B. Paul and Karen Buch
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8291
William A. Mehan
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for William A. Mehan
Neo Poyiadji
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Neo Poyiadji
Aaron B. Paul
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Buch
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karen Buch

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The choroid plexus contains specialized ependymal cells responsible for CSF production. Recent studies have demonstrated volumetric and perfusion changes in the choroid plexus with age and neurodegenerative disorders, however, volumetric changes in the choroid plexus in low pressure states is not known. The purpose of this study is to evaluate volumetric differences in choroid plexus size in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) resultant from spinal CSF leaks compared with healthy controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, institutional review board–approved study. Patients with MRI evidence of SIH and a spinal CSF leak diagnosed on myelography and subsequently confirmed at surgery were included in this study. All patients included in this study including age-matched healthy controls had a brain MRI performed on a either a 1.5 or 3T scanner with acquisition of 3D T1 postcontrast (eg, BRAVO, MPRAGE, etc). In all patients, the trigonum ventriculi volume, in the atria of the lateral ventricles, was contoured by using Visage-7 segmentation tools on the volumetric postcontrast T1 sequence. A basic 2-tailed t test was used to compare choroid plexus volumes between the 2 groups.

RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included with 17 patients with SIH with spinal CSF leak and 17 healthy control patients who were age- and sex-matched. The mean age of patients was 45 years, standard deviation 14 years. The mean volume of the choroid plexus for patients with SIH with spinal CSF leak was 1.2 cm3 (standard deviation = 0.26) compared with 0.63 cm3 (standard deviation = 0.31) in the control group (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study demonstrate a higher choroid plexus volume in patients with SIH with spinal CSF leak compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls. This likely reflects compensatory mechanisms to counteract intracranial hypotension by increasing CSF production as well as increased vascularity of the choroid plexus through expansion of the intracranial blood pool.

ABBREVIATIONS:

ICHD-3
International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition
SIH
spontaneous intracranial hypotension

The choroid plexus is a specialized structure within the ventricular system tasked with modulating CSF production and the expression of various proteins, neurotrophic factors, and neuroinflammatory cytokines.1⇓-3 The choroid plexus contains fenestrated capillaries and thus lacks a blood-brain barrier. Age-related changes within the choroid plexus affecting volumetric size and function have been previously described noting a reduction in CSF production and the accumulation of calcification with increasing age.4⇓-6 Recent interest in changes to function and size of the choroid plexus have grown due to its possible relationship to the glymphatic system with potential implications in neurodegenerative processes and other neuroinflammatory/immune-mediated disorders.7⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓-15

Before this recent resurgence of interest in the choroid plexus, earlier studies have focused on the role of the choroid plexus in hydrocephalus associated with hyperplasia.16,17 However, to date, the role of the choroid plexus in modulating states of relatively low or decreasing amounts of CSF has not been investigated. Numerous brain imaging markers associated with intracranial hypotension have been previously described including distention of the dural venous sinuses, engorgement of the pituitary gland, features of brain sagging, diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement, and presence of extra-axial fluid collections.18⇓-20 Many of these features have demonstrated a high validity in the prediction of a spinal CSF leak being detected on myelography, termed the Bern score.21 However, a description in size and volumetric differences in the choroid plexus in the setting of intracranial hypotension due to conditions such as a spinal CSF leak have yet to be investigated.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in choroid plexus volume in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) secondary to spinal CSF leaks compared with age-matched healthy controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, institutional review board–approved study performed at a single institution with a robust spinal CSF leak service with greater than 80 patient visits per year for evaluation of spinal CSF leak. Inclusion criteria for study patients included: 1) adult patients; 2) those with imaging features of SIH on MRI; and 3) those who had a spinal CSF leak diagnosed on CT myelography that was subsequently confirmed upon surgical repair. Inclusion criteria for control patients included: 1) adult patients; 2) those who had a brain MRI with contrast; 3) those who had no history of migraines or chronic headaches; and 4) those who also had no clinical features, imaging features, or symptoms of SIH. All patients with SIH with a confirmed spinal CSF leak met inclusion criteria for SIH based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria.22 All healthy control patients were those undergoing a brain MRI with contrast as a known healthy control participant in neuroimaging research or those undergoing a brain MRI with contrast for evaluation of a suspected pituitary microadenoma. Exclusion criteria for both the study patients and control patients were those with significant artifacts on MRI precluding a diagnostic assessment, those with incomplete medical records, any history of neurosurgery, hydrocephalus or any history of a ventricular shunt placement, malignancy, craniofacial radiation, history of vasculopathy/vasculitis, intracranial vascular malformation (including dural arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous malformations, Sturge Weber syndrome, etc), history of intracranial infection, multiple sclerosis, or suspicion for a neurodegenerative process.

All brain MRI examinations included in this study were performed with gadolinium contrast and included an isotropic 3D T1 sequence (such as BRAVO, MPRAGE, etc). All MRI studies were performed over a 3-year time period from 2020–2023. Examinations were performed across multiple MRI vendor platforms and included 1.5T and 3T magnet strengths. Before inclusion of this study, all MRI examinations were reviewed for quality by a single neuroradiologist (author K.B.).

3D volumetric contouring was manually performed in Visage 7 by using the structure segmentation toolkit (Visage version 7.1.18; Visage Imaging). Manual segmentation of the choroid plexus on the left and right side in each patient was performed independently and obtained from 2D axial images (Fig 1). The choroid plexus at the trigonum ventriculi was targeted for segmentation. The trigonum ventriculi is the triangular cavity of the lateral ventricle at the junction of the lateral ventricular body and the occipital and temporal horns. This methodology for choroid plexus segmentation was adapted from the work of Senay et al.23 The choroid plexus volumes were independently calculated for the left and right side in all patients and were counted as 2 independent and discrete data points (ie, 2 choroid plexus volumes per patient). Choroid plexus cysts and xanthogranulomas if present were excluded from the choroid plexus contours.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Forty-three-year old man with SIH who was found to have a type 3 spinal CSF leak. Axial T1 postcontrast MPRAGE sequences demonstrating manual segmentation of the right choroid plexus as described in the Materials and Methods section.

Basic demographic data including patient age, sex, type of CSF leak found in patients with SIH, and reason for MRI evaluation were obtained. The Bern score, a probabilistic scoring system for likelihood of spinal CSF leak based on brain MRI findings, was calculated for all patients with SIH with spinal CSF leaks as well as for control patients (for the purposes of this study).21,24 Control patients and patients with SIH with spinal CSF leaks were age- and sex-matched.

Statistical analysis by using a 2-tailed t test was used to compare choroid plexus volumes between patients with SIH with spinal CSF leak and age- and sex-matched healthy control patients.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients (for a total of 68 recorded choroid plexus volumes) were included in this study including 17 patients with SIH with confirmed spinal CSF leak and 17 healthy control patients. The mean age of patients with SIH with confirmed CSF leak was 45.1 years (standard deviation = 14.5 years). The mean age of the healthy control patients was 45.3 years (standard deviation = 14.3 years) with no significant difference found between the age of study patients and control patients (P = .86). There were 8 female and 11 male patients comprising both the patients with spinal CSF leak and the healthy control patients for sex matching of the cohort.

Of the 17 patients with a confirmed spinal CSF leak, 10 had a type 1 spinal CSF leak (dural tear from an osseous spicule), 2 had a type 2 spinal CSF leak (root sleeve diverticular defect), and 5 had a type 3 spinal CSF leak (CSF-venous fistula). Bern score calculations for each of the patients with SIH related to a spinal CSF leak ranged from 5–9 (mean = 7.8, standard deviation = 1.4), all in keeping with a high probability for a spinal CSF leak. While the healthy control patients had no clinical or imaging features to suggest SIH related to any cause, a Bern score was calculated for all healthy control patients. All healthy control patients had a Bern score of 0.

All patients with CSF leak had at least 1 MRI brain imaging feature of intracranial hypotension, while none of the controls had imaging features of intracranial hypotension. The mean volume of the choroid plexus for study patients with SIH from a spinal CSF leak was 1.2 cm3 (standard deviation = 0.26, interquartile range = 0.31) compared with 0.63 cm3 (standard deviation = 0.31, interquartile range = 0.42) (P < .0001) in healthy control patients (Fig 2). A summary of this demographic, clinical, and imaging data are displayed in the Table.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Axial T1 postcontrast MPRAGE sequences through the level of the atria of the lateral ventricles. A, (top) shows the caliber of the choroid plexus in a 34-year-old man with a type 1 CSF leak. Additionally shown in this image is diffuse thickening of the pachymeninges, a frequent finding in patients with intracranial hypotension. B, (bottom) shows the caliber of the choroid plexus at the same level in a 35-year-old male healthy control.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Basic demographic, clinical, and imaging features for patients with SIH with spinal CSF leaks compared with healthy control patients

DISCUSSION

The results of this study demonstrate a statistically significant difference in choroid plexus volumes in patients with spinal CSF leaks and brain MRI manifestations of intracranial hypotension compared with age-matched healthy control patients. Larger choroid plexus volumes were observed in patients with SIH related to spinal CSF leaks compared with healthy control patients. This finding may be resultant from compensatory mechanisms of the choroid plexus to increase CSF production to replace progressive CSF loss related to the spinal CSF leak.1-2,25,26 Furthermore, the larger choroid plexus volumes could reflect a response to CSF leakage through aquaporin-4-channel up-regulation or increased glymphatic system clearance.27 Interestingly, a prior study demonstrated larger choroid plexus volumes in multiple sclerosis compared with both neuromyelitis optica and healthy controls, which may further support aquaporin-4-channel up-regulation as a physiologic response.27 Additionally, both hyperplasia and vascular engorgement from expansion of the intracranial blood pool may contribute to higher choroid plexus volumes in patients with SIH with spinal CSF leaks. There may potentially be other unknown mechanisms at play in this setting.

There are several limitations to this study in that the sample size is relatively small. Future direction includes conducting this analysis on a large cohort of patients to investigate the generalizability of these results to a large population. This small sample size is in line with prior studies examining volumetric changes in the choroid plexus. Additionally, in this study only volumetric size was evaluated and more functional markers of the choroid plexus such as perfusion metrics were not investigated. Furthermore, additional potential confounders such as medication history (eg, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, among others), body mass index, and blood pressure were not taken into account in this study, which may have a potential impact on study results.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results from this pilot study demonstrate volumetric differences with larger choroid plexus volumes in patients with spinal CSF leaks compared with healthy controls likely reflecting underlying compensatory mechanisms. The results of this study may be potentially useful in the preprocedural evaluation of patients with suspected spinal CSF leak as an additional diagnostic predictor. Furthermore, choroid plexus volume measurements may potentially be used to evaluate the posttreatment efficacy of these patients, though larger and more robust studies need to be performed to validate the results herein.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.
    1. Hofman FM,
    2. Chen TC
    . Choroid plexus: structure and function. In: The Choroid Plexus and Cerebrospinal Fluid. 2016;29–40
  2. 2.
    1. Lun MP,
    2. Monuki ES,
    3. Lehtinen MK
    . Development and functions of the choroid plexus-erebrospinal fluid system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2015;16:445–57 doi:10.1038/nrn3921 pmid:26174708
  3. 3.
    1. Arnaud K,
    2. Di Nardo AA
    . Choroid plexus trophic factors in the developing and adult brain. Front Biol 2016;11:214–21 doi:10.1007/s11515-016-1401-7
  4. 4.
    1. May C,
    2. Kaye JA,
    3. Atack JR, et al
    . Cerebrospinal fluid production is reduced in healthy aging. Neurology 1990;40:500–3 doi:10.1212/wnl.40.3_part_1.500 pmid:2314595
  5. 5.
    1. Chiu C,
    2. Miller MC,
    3. Caralopoulos IN, et al
    . Temporal course of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and amyloid accumulation in the aging rat brain from three to thirty months. Fluids Barriers CNS 2012;9:3 doi:10.1186/2045-8118-9-3 pmid:22269091
  6. 6.
    1. Eisma JJ,
    2. McKnight CD,
    3. Hett K, et al
    . Choroid plexus perfusion and bulk cerebrospinal fluid flow across the adult lifespan. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2023;43:269–80 doi:10.1177/0271678X221129101 pmid:36200473
  7. 7.
    1. Choi JD,
    2. Moon Y,
    3. Kim HJ, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume and permeability at brain MRI within the Alzheimer disease clinical spectrum. Radiology 2022;304:635–45 doi:10.1148/radiol.212400 pmid:35579521
  8. 8.
    1. Bouhrara M,
    2. Walker KA,
    3. Alisch JSR, et al
    . Association of plasma markers of Alzheimer's disease, neurodegeneration, and neuroinflammation with the choroid plexus integrity in aging. Aging Dis Epub ahead of print January 8, 2024. doi:10.14336/AD.2023.1226
  9. 9.
    1. Assogna M,
    2. Premi E,
    3. Gazzina S, et al
    . Association of choroid plexus volume with serum biomarkers, clinical features, and disease severity in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration spectrum. Neurology 2023;101:e1218–e1230 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207600 pmid:37500561
  10. 10.
    1. Jeong SH,
    2. Jeong HJ,
    3. Sunwoo MK, et al
    . Association between choroid plexus volume and cognition in Parkinson disease. Eur J Neurol 2023;30:3114–23 doi:10.1111/ene.15999 pmid:37498202
  11. 11.
    1. Klistorner S,
    2. Van der Walt A,
    3. Barnett MH, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume is enlarged in clinically isolated syndrome patients with optic neuritis. Mult Scler 2023;29:540–48 doi:10.1177/13524585231157206 pmid:36876595
  12. 12.
    1. Li Y,
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Zhong W, et al
    . Choroid plexus enlargement exacerbates white matter hyperintensity growth through glymphatic impairment. Ann Neurol 2023;94:182–95 doi:10.1002/ana.26648 pmid:36971336
  13. 13.
    1. Bravi B,
    2. Melloni EMT,
    3. Paolini M, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume is increased in mood disorders and associates with circulating inflammatory cytokines. Brain Behav Immun 2024;116:52–61 doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2023.11.036 pmid:38030049
  14. 14.
    1. Bonifacio C,
    2. Savini G,
    3. Reca C, et al
    . The gut-brain axis: correlation of choroid plexus volume and permeability with inflammatory biomarkers in Crohn's disease. Neurobiol Dis 2024;192:106416 doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106416 pmid:38272141
  15. 15.
    1. Raghib MF,
    2. Bao F,
    3. Elkhooly M, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume as a marker of retinal atrophy in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2024;457:122884 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2024.122884 pmid:38237367
  16. 16.
    1. Yamada S,
    2. Mase M
    . Cerebrospinal fluid production and absorption and ventricular enlargement mechanisms in hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2023;63:141–51 doi:10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0331 pmid:36858632
  17. 17.
    1. Rekate HL
    . Hydrocephalus in infants: the unique biomechanics and why they matter. Childs Nerv Syst 2020;36:1713–28 doi:10.1007/s00381-020-04683-7 pmid:32488353
  18. 18.
    1. Schuchardt FF,
    2. Krafft AJ,
    3. Miguel Telega L, et al
    . Interrelation between cerebrospinal fluid pressure, intracranial morphology and venous hemodynamics studied by 4D flow MRI. Clin Neuroradiol 2024;34:391–401 doi:10.1007/s00062-023-01381-0
  19. 19.
    1. Mehan WA, Jr.,
    2. Buch K
    . Imaging, clinical, and demographic differences in patients with type III spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak (cerebrospinal venous fistulas) compared with patients with types I and II spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2022;46:986–90 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001369 pmid:36112050
  20. 20.
    1. Callen AL,
    2. Pattee J,
    3. Thaker AA, et al
    . Relationship of Bern score, spinal elastance, and opening pressure in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurology 2023;100:e2237–46 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207267 pmid:37015821
  21. 21.
    1. Dobrocky T,
    2. Grunder L,
    3. Breiding PS, et al
    . Assessing spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension with a scoring system based on brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:580–87 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4921 pmid:30776059
  22. 22.
    1. Curone M,
    2. Peccarisi C,
    3. Bussone G
    . Headache attributed to intracranial pressure alterations: applicability of the International Classification of Headache Disorders ICHD-3 beta version versus ICHD-2. Neurol Sci 2015;36(Suppl 1):137–39 doi:10.1007/s10072-015-2202-5 pmid:26017529
  23. 23.
    1. Senay O,
    2. Seethaler M,
    3. Makris N, et al
    . A preliminary choroid plexus volumetric study in individuals with psychosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2023;44:2465–78 doi:10.1002/hbm.26224 pmid:36744628
  24. 24.
    1. Kim DK,
    2. Carr CM,
    3. Benson JC, et al
    . Diagnostic yield of lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelogram stratified by brain MRI findings. Neurology 2021;96:e1312–18 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000011522 pmid:33472917
  25. 25.
    1. Cox JT,
    2. Gaglani SM,
    3. Jusué-Torres I, et al
    . Choroid plexus hyperplasia: a possible cause of hydrocephalus in adults. Neurology 2016;87:2058–60 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003303 pmid:27733567
  26. 26.
    1. Christensen J,
    2. Li C,
    3. Mychasiuk R
    . Choroid plexus function in neurological homeostasis and disorders: the awakening of the circadian clocks and orexins. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2022;42:1163–75 doi:10.1177/0271678X221082786 pmid:35296175
  27. 27.
    1. Müller J,
    2. Sinnecker T,
    3. Wendebourg MJ, et al
    . Choroid plexus volume in multiple sclerosis vs neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2022;9:e1147 doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000001147
  • Received February 12, 2024.
  • Accepted after revision March 8, 2024.
  • © 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire