Normal Facial Nerve Enhancement on Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination MRI Sequence

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Kochhar A,
   2. Larian B,
   3. Azizzadeh B

   . Facial nerve and parotid gland anatomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2016;49:273–84 doi:10.1016/j.otc.2015.10.002 pmid:27040583

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Toulgoat F,
   2. Sarrazin JL,
   3. Benoudiba F, et al

   . Facial nerve: from anatomy to pathology. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013;94:1033–42 doi:10.1016/j.diii.2013.06.016 pmid:23891166

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Al-Noury K,
   2. Lotfy A

   . Normal and pathological findings for the facial nerve on magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 2011;66:701–07 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2011.02.012 pmid:21514926

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Hong HS,
   2. Yi BH,
   3. Cha JG, et al

   . Enhancement pattern of the normal facial nerve at 3.0 T temporal MRI. Br J Radiol 2010;83:118–21 doi:10.1259/bjr/70067143 pmid:19546177

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Dehkharghani S,
   2. Lubarsky M,
   3. Aiken AH, et al

   . Redefining normal facial nerve enhancement: healthy subject comparison of typical enhancement patterns—unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spin-echo versus 3D inversion recovery–prepared fast spoiled gradient-echo imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:1108–13 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11659 pmid:24758667

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Warne R,
   2. Carney OM,
   3. Wang G, et al

   . Enhancement patterns of the normal facial nerve on three-dimensional T1W fast spin echo MRI. Br J Radiol 2021;94:20201025 doi:10.1259/bjr.20201025 pmid:33502914

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Burmeister HP,
   2. Hause F,
   3. Baltzer PA, et al

   . Improvement of visualization of the intermediofacial nerve in the temporal bone using 3T magnetic resonance imaging: part 1: the facial nerve. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:782–88 doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e31818da6bb pmid:19820512

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Haneda J,
   2. Ishikawa K,
   3. Okamoto K

   . Better continuity of the facial nerve demonstrated in the temporal bone on three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging with volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition than that with fast field echo at 3.0 Tesla MRI. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019;63:745–50 doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12962 pmid:31587502

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Rofsky NM,
   2. Lee VS,
   3. Laub G, et al

   . Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999;212:876–84 doi:10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se34876 pmid:10478260

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Danieli L,
    2. Riccitelli GC,
    3. Distefano D, et al

    . Brain tumor-enhancement visualization and morphometric assessment: a comparison of MPRAGE, SPACE, and VIBE MRI techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1140–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6096 pmid:31221635

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Chang KJ,
    2. Kamel IR,
    3. Macura KJ, et al

    . 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiographics 2008;28:1983–98

    CrossRefPubMed