Artificial Intelligence Efficacy as a Function of Trainee Interpreter Proficiency: Lessons from a Randomized Controlled Trial

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Chartrand G,
   2. Cheng PM,
   3. Vorontsov E, et al

   . Deep learning: a primer for radiologists. Radiographics 2017;37:2113–31 doi:10.1148/rg.2017170077 pmid:29131760

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Heit JJ,
   2. Iv M,
   3. Wintermark M

   . Imaging of intracranial hemorrhage. J Stroke 2017;19:11–27 doi:10.5853/jos.2016.00563 pmid:28030895

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Fasen BA,
   2. Heijboer RJ,
   3. Hulsmans FJ, et al

   . CT angiography in evaluating large-vessel occlusion in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke: factors associated with diagnostic error in clinical practice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:607–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6469 pmid:32165362

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Matsoukas S,
   2. Scaggiante J,
   3. Schuldt BR, et al

   . Accuracy of artificial intelligence for the detection of intracranial hemorrhage and chronic cerebral microbleeds: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Radiol Med 2022;127:1106–23 doi:10.1007/s11547-022-01530-4 pmid:35962888

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Rava RA,
   2. Seymour SE,
   3. LaQue ME, et al

   . Assessment of an artificial intelligence algorithm for detection of intracranial hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 2021;150:e209–17 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.134 pmid:33684578

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Petry M,
   2. Lansky C,
   3. Chodakiewitz Y, et al

   . Decreased hospital length of stay for ICH and PE after adoption of an artificial intelligence-augmented radiological worklist triage system. Radiol Res Pract 2022;2022:2141839 doi:10.1155/2022/2141839 pmid:36034496

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Pinto Dos Santos D,
   2. Giese D,
   3. Brodehl S, et al

   . Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey. Eur Radiol 2019;29:1640–46 doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1 pmid:29980928

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Yang L,
   2. Ene IC,
   3. Arabi Belaghi R, et al

   . Stakeholders’ perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in radiology: a scoping review. Eur Radiol 2022;32:1477–95 doi:10.1007/s00330-021-08214-z pmid:34545445

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Juravle G,
   2. Boudouraki A,
   3. Terziyska M, et al

   . Trust in artificial intelligence for medical diagnoses. Prog Brain Res 2020;253:263–82 doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.06.006 pmid:32771128

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Wagner AR,
    2. Borenstein J,
    3. Howard A

    . Overtrust in the robotic age. Commun ACM 2018;61:22–24 doi:10.1145/3241365

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    1. Borracci RA,
    2. Arribalzaga EB

    . The incidence of overconfidence and underconfidence effects in medical student examinations. J Surg Educ 2018;75:1223–29 doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.01.015 pmid:29397355

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Martinez-Gutierrez JC,
    2. Kim Y,
    3. Salazar-Marioni S, et al

    . Automated large vessel occlusion detection software and thrombectomy treatment times: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2023;80:1182–90 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3206 pmid:37721738

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Skitka LJ,
    2. Mosier KL,
    3. Burdick M, et al

    . Automation bias and errors: are crews better than individuals? Int J Aviat Psychol 2000;10:85–97 doi:10.1207/S15327108IJAP1001_5 pmid:11543300

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Itoh M

    . Toward overtrust-free advanced driver assistance systems. Cogn Tech Work 2012;14:51–60 doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0195-2

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    1. Kapoor N,
    2. Gaviola G,
    3. Wang A, et al

    . Quantifying and characterizing trainee participation in a major academic radiology department. Curr Probl Diagn Radiology 2019;48:436–40 doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.07.004 pmid:30144966

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Arthur W Jr.,
    2. Bennett W Jr.,
    3. Stanush PL, et al

    . Factors that influence skill decay and retention: a quantitative review and analysis. Human Performance 1998;11:57–101 doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1101_3

    CrossRefWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Li D,
    2. Pehrson LM,
    3. Lauridsen CA, et al

    . The added effect of artificial intelligence on physicians’ performance in detecting thoracic pathologies on CT and chest X-ray: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11:2206 doi:10.3390/diagnostics11122206 pmid:34943442

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Yu F,
    2. Moehring A,
    3. Banerjee O, et al

    . Heterogeneity and predictors of the effects of AI assistance on radiologists. Nat Med 2024;30:837–49 doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02850-w pmid:38504016

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Jacques T,
    2. Cardot N,
    3. Ventre J, et al

    . Commercially-available AI algorithm improves radiologists’ sensitivity for wrist and hand fracture detection on X-ray, compared to a CT-based ground truth. Eur Radiol 2024;34:2885–94 doi:10.1007/s00330-023-10380-1 pmid:37919408

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Watanabe Y,
    2. Tanaka T,
    3. Nishida A, et al

    . Improvement of the diagnostic accuracy for intracranial haemorrhage using deep learning-based computer-assisted detection. Neuroradiology 2021;63:713–20 doi:10.1007/s00234-020-02566-x pmid:33025044

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Ewals LJ,
    2. van der Wulp K,
    3. van den Borne BE, et al

    . The effects of artificial intelligence assistance on the radiologists’ assessment of lung nodules on CT scans: a systematic review. J Clin Med 2023;12:3536 doi:10.3390/jcm12103536

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Busby LP,
    2. Courtier JL,
    3. Glastonbury CM

    . Bias in radiology: the how and why of misses and misinterpretations. Radiographics 2018;38:236–47 doi:10.1148/rg.2018170107 pmid:29194009

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Lee CS,
    2. Nagy PG,
    3. Weaver SJ, et al

    . Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:611–17 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10375 pmid:23971454

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Yacoub B,
    2. Varga-Szemes A,
    3. Schoepf UJ, et al

    . Impact of artificial intelligence assistance on chest CT interpretation times: a prospective randomized study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022;219:743–51 doi:10.2214/AJR.22.27598 pmid:35703413

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Gaube S,
    2. Suresh H,
    3. Raue M, et al

    . Non-task expert physicians benefit from correct explainable AI advice when reviewing x-rays. Sci Rep 2023;13:1383 doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28633-w pmid:36697450

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Kruger J,
    2. Dunning D

    . Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;77:1121–34 doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121 pmid:10626367

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science