Imaging Findings and MRI Patterns in a Cohort of 18q Chromosomal Abnormalities

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Cody JD,
   2. Heard PL,
   3. Crandall AC, et al

   . Narrowing critical regions and determining penetrance for selected 18q- phenotypes. Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A:1421–30 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32899 pmid:19533771

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Heard PL,
   2. Carter EM,
   3. Crandall AC, et al

   . High resolution genomic analysis of 18q− using oligo-microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A:1431–37 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32900 pmid:19533772

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Cody JD,
   2. Sebold C,
   3. Heard P, et al

   . Consequences of chromsome18q deletions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2015;169:265–80 doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31446 pmid:26235940

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Cody JD,
   2. Heard P,
   3. Rupert D, et al

   . Chromosome 18 gene dosage map 2.0. Hum Genet 2018;137:961–70 doi:10.1007/s00439-018-1960-6 pmid:30448861

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Cody JD,
   2. Hasi-Zogaj M,
   3. Heard P, et al

   . The chromosome 18 clinical resource center. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2018;6:416–21 doi:10.1002/mgg3.385 pmid:29603904

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Feenstra I,
   2. Vissers LELM,
   3. Orsel M, et al

   . Genotype–phenotype mapping of chromosome 18q deletions by high-resolution array CGH: an update of the phenotypic map. American J of Med Genetics Pt A 2007;143A:1858–67 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31850

   CrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. Lancaster JL,
   2. Cody JD,
   3. Andrews T, et al

   . Myelination in children with partial deletions of chromosome 18q. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:447

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Loevner LA,
   2. Shapiro RM,
   3. Grossman RI, et al

   . White matter changes associated with deletions of the long arm of chromosome 18 (18q- syndrome): a dysmyelinating disorder? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1843–48

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Inagaki M,
   2. Ando Y,
   3. Mito T, et al

   . Comparison of brain imaging and neuropathology in cases of trisomy 18 and 13. Neuroradiology 1987;29:474–79 doi:10.1007/BF00341747 pmid:3317111

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Norman RM

    . Neuropathological findings in trisomies 13–15 and 17–18 with special reference to the cerebellum. Develop Med Child Neuro 1966;8:170–77 doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1966.tb01723.x

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    1. Takano M,
    2. Hirata H,
    3. Kagawa Y, et al

    . Ratio of fetal anteroposterior to transverse cerebellar diameter for detection of the cerebellar hypoplasia in the second trimester and comparison with trisomy 18. J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;41:1757–61 doi:10.1111/jog.12795

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Fryns JP,
    2. Kleczkowska A,
    3. Jaeken J, et al

    . Mosaic 13 trisomy due to de novo 13/13 translocation with subsequent fission. Karyotype: 46,XX,-13, +t(13;13)(p11;q11)/46, XX, del(13)(p11). A second example. Ann Genet 1989;32:177–79 pmid:2486064

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Benini R,
    2. Saint-Martin C,
    3. Shevell MI, et al

    . Abnormal myelination in ring chromosome 18 syndrome. J Child Neurol 2012;27:1042–47 doi:10.1177/0883073811430268 pmid:22290857

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Anzai M,
    2. Arai-Ichinoi N,
    3. Takezawa Y, et al

    . Patchy white matter hyperintensity in ring chromosome 18 syndrome. Pediatr Int 2016;58:919–22 doi:10.1111/ped.13043 pmid:27577543

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Nakayama J,
    2. Hamano K,
    3. Shimakura Y, et al

    . Abnormal myelination in a patient with ring chromosome 18. Neuropediatrics 1997;28:335–37 doi:10.1055/s-2007-973727 pmid:9453033

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Ebrahimi-Fakhari D,
    2. Alecu JE,
    3. Ziegler M

    ; International AP-4-HSP Registry and Natural History Study, et al. Systematic analysis of brain MRI findings in adaptor protein complex 4-associated hereditary spastic paraplegia. Neurology 2021;97:e1942–54 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000012836 pmid:34544818

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Plecko B,
    2. Stöckler-Ipsiroglu S,
    3. Gruber S, et al

    . Degree of hypomyelination and magnetic resonance spectroscopy findings in patients with Pelizaeus Merzbacher phenotype. Neuropediatrics 2003;34:127–36 doi:10.1055/s-2003-41276 pmid:12910435

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Rutherford MA

    . MRI of the Neonatal Brain. W.B. Saunders; 2002
19. 19.↵
    1. Garel C,
    2. Cont I,
    3. Alberti C, et al

    . Biometry of the corpus callosum in children: MR imaging reference data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1436–43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2542 pmid:21799035

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Jandeaux C,
    2. Kuchcinski G,
    3. Ternynck C, et al

    . Biometry of the cerebellar vermis and brainstem in children: MR imaging reference data from measurements in 718 children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1835–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6257 pmid:31624120

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Tich SNT,
    2. Anderson PJ,
    3. Hunt RW, et al

    . Neurodevelopmental and perinatal correlates of simple brain metrics in very preterm infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:216–22 doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.9 pmid:21383271

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Lee S,
    2. Lee DK

    . What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test? Korean J Anesthesiol 2018;71:353–60 doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.00242 pmid:30157585

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. MacFarland TW,
    2. Yates JM

    1. MacFarland TW,
    2. Yates JM

    . Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test. In: MacFarland TW, Yates JM, eds. Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics for the Biological Sciences Using R. Springer-Verlag International Publishing; 2016:133–175
24. 24.↵
    1. Mayson TA,
    2. Ward V,
    3. Davies KR, et al

    . Reliability of retrospective assignment of gross motor function classification system scores. Dev Neurorehabil 2013;16:207–09 doi:10.3109/17518423.2012.755575 pmid:23323825

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Cayami FK,
    2. Bugiani M,
    3. Pouwels PJW, et al

    . 4H leukodystrophy: lessons from 3t imaging. Neuropediatrics 2018;49:112–17 doi:10.1055/s-0037-1608780 pmid:29179231

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Stricker T,
    2. Martin E,
    3. Boesch C

    . Development of the human cerebellum observed with high-field-strength MR imaging. Radiology 1990;177:431–35 doi:10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217780 pmid:2217780

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Kline AD,
    2. White ME,
    3. Wapner R, et al

    . Molecular analysis of the 18q- syndrome—and correlation with phenotype. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:895–906 pmid:8488839

    PubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Linnankivi T,
    2. Tienari P,
    3. Somer M, et al

    . 18q deletions: clinical, molecular, and brain MRI findings of 14 individuals. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140:331–39 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31072 pmid:16419126

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Gay CT,
    2. Hardies LJ,
    3. Rauch RA, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates incomplete myelination in 18q- syndrome: evidence for myelin basic protein haploinsufficiency. Am J Med Genet 1997;74:422–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Malik P,
    2. Muthusamy K,
    3. Mankad K, et al

    . Solving the hypomyelination conundrum—imaging perspectives. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2020;27:9–24 doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.04.007 pmid:32418752

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Kinoshita M,
    2. Nakamura Y,
    3. Nakano R, et al

    . Thirty-one autopsy cases of trisomy 18: clinical features and pathological findings. Pediatr Pathol 1989;9:445–57 doi:10.3109/15513818909022365 pmid:2798270

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Weber WW,
    2. Mamunes P,
    3. Day R, et al

    . Trisomy 17-18(e): studies in long-term survival with report of two autopsied cases. Pediatrics 1964;34:533–41 doi:10.1542/peds.34.4.533 pmid:14218053

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Kakulas BA,
    2. Trowell HR,
    3. Cullity GJ, et al

    . The neuropathology of the 17-18 trisomy syndrome. Proc Aust Assoc Neurol 1968;5:189–95 pmid:5709959

    PubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Vogel H,
    2. Urich H,
    3. Horoupian DS, et al

    . The Brain in the 18q‐ syndrome. Develop Med Child Neuro 1990;32:732–37 doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1990.tb08435.x

    CrossRef
35. 35.↵
    1. Felding I,
    2. Kristoffersson U,
    3. Sjöström H, et al

    . Contribution to the 18q- syndrome. A patient with del(18) (q22.3qter). Clin Genet 1987;31:206–10

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Whitehead MT,
    2. Raju A,
    3. Choudhri AF

    . Normal centrolineal myelination of the callosal splenium reflects the development of the cortical origin and size of its commissural fibers. Neuroradiology 2014;56:333–38 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1323-5 pmid:24463571

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Tyan AE,
    2. McKinney AM,
    3. Hanson T, et al

    . Comparison of spin-echo and gradient-echo T1-weighted and spin-echo T2-weighted images at 3T in evaluating term-neonatal myelination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:411–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4099 pmid:25213882

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Prenger EC,
    2. Beckett WW,
    3. Kollias SS, et al

    . Comparison of T2-weighted spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques in the evaluation of myelination. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:179–84 doi:10.1002/jmri.1880040215 pmid:8180458

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Guleria S,
    2. Kelly TG

    . Myelin, myelination, and corresponding magnetic resonance imaging changes. Radiology Clin North Am 2014;52:227–39 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2013.11.009 pmid:24582338

    CrossRefPubMed