Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

EditorialEditorials

Don't You Call Me Desiccated, J. Wellington Wimpy

V. Haughton
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2010, 31 (9) 1551; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2259
V. Haughton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

MR imaging of the lumbar spine often reveals disks with lower than normal signal intensity in the nucleus pulposus without decreased disk height or abnormal contours of the annulus fibrosus. Characterizing these disks as “dehydrated,” “desiccated,” or “dark” suggests that they need only a little more water to functional normally. Without evidence of herniation, protrusion, extrusion, or bulging, these disks meet the criteria for a stage III degenerated disk in the grading scale of Pfirrmann et al.1 Stage III is distinguished from stage I and II disks, which are normal disks, by consolidation of fibrous tissue in the nucleus pulposus, loss of annular-nuclear demarcation, and decreased T2 signal intensity in the nucleus pulposus.

The numerous studies in which diskography and MR imaging are correlated document the presence of a radial tear in dehydrated disks.2 Diskography in these disks consistently shows leakage of contrast medium from the nucleus pulposus into the epidural space and elicits “concordant pain”—that is the patient's typical back or leg pain. These observations show that the diminished T2 signal intensity in the disk reflects the presence of a radial tear in the annulus fibrosus.

MR imaging may show the presence of a radial tear in these dehydrated disks.3 The high-intensity zone or streak of higher signal intensity in the periphery of a dark disk corresponds to the radial tear. This sign reflects the presence of granulation tissue or liquid material in the radial tear. MR imaging has relatively poor sensitivity for the detection of the radial tear because many radial tears do not have sufficient tissue within them to produce the imaging sign.4 Incidentally, the radial tear should be distinguished from concentric and transverse tears of the annulus fibrosus, 2 types of tears that have no role in the pathogenesis of disk degeneration but occur often in an adult population.5 Radial tears may also be demonstrated as contrast enhancement in the disk.6

Chemically, dark disks differ from normal disks. They have reduced concentrations and altered structure of glycosaminoglycans, which explain the reduced water content in these disks.7 Disks with normal glycosaminoglycans concentration lose water reversibly, due to diurnal variations, but do not undergo the irreversible loss of water that is implied by the term “dehydrated disk.” The loss of T2 signal intensity occurs secondary to biochemical changes, specifically the loss of glycosaminoglycans.

Biomechanically, dark disks differ from normal disks.8 The radial tear, disrupting fibers in all layers of the annulus fibrosus, changes the physical properties of the disk. Biomechanical studies show that dark disks have diminished stiffness, especially to axial rotatory torques. In biomechanical terms, the dark disk is a failed disk, responding abnormally to forces and torsions applied to it.

Dehydrated disks may cause low back or radiating pain by multiple mechanisms without herniation of the nucleus pulposus or bulging of the annulus fibrosus. The ingrowth into the radial of granulation tissue containing blood vessels and nerve endings converts the intervertebral disk to an innervated structure.9 If the nerve endings are nociceptors, pain may result from the application of forces and torques to the disk. Pain resulting from stimulation of nerve endings in the disk may cause pain that is felt as originating in the low back or pain referred to a lower extremity, simulating the radicular pain resulting from nerve root compression. Second, the biomechanical properties of the dark disk may be the cause of pain. Due to the reduced stiffness of a disk with a radial tear, daily activities may result in excessive motion between 2 vertebrae joined by the disk.10 This motion may produce intermittent compression of a spinal nerve and/or put excessive strain on the anterior longitudinal ligaments and facet joint capsules. Third, the radial tear may allow leakage of liquid glycosaminoglycans solutions into the epidural space where they may cause inflammation and pain. Disks with reduced T2 signal intensity have the potential to produce pain.

Intervertebral disks that have diminished T2 signal intensity without evidence of disk collapse or herniation differ from normal disks not only in water content but also in gross morphology, biochemistry, and biomechanics. Disks demonstrating lowered signal intensity but no evidence of herniation or bulging, meet the criteria for stage III degenerated disks in the Pfirrmann system and have the potential to cause low back or leg pain. The term “early disk degeneration” better characterizes these disks than terms like “dehydration” or “desiccation.”

Footnotes

  • J. Wellington Wimpy, a comic strip character featured in the “Popeye” series, was intellectual, soft-spoken, and generally lacking in fortitude and determination.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Pfirrmann CW,
    2. Metzdorf A,
    3. Zanetti M,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001; 26: 1873– 78
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. O'Neill C,
    2. Kurgansky M,
    3. Kaiser J,
    4. et al
    . Accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of discogenic pain. Pain Physician 2008; 11: 311– 26
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Aprill C,
    2. Bogduk N
    . High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1992; 65: 361– 69
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Yu SW,
    2. Haughton VM,
    3. Sether LA,
    4. et al.
    Comparison of MR and diskography in detecting radial tears of the anulus: a postmortem study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10: 1077– 81
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yu S,
    2. Sether LA,
    3. Ho PS,
    4. et al
    . Tears of the annulus fibrosus: correlation between MR and pathologic findings in cadavers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988; 9: 367– 70
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ross JS,
    2. Modic MT,
    3. Masaryk TJ
    . Tears of the anulus fibrosus: assessment with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10: 1251– 54
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Weidenbaum M,
    2. Foster RJ,
    3. Best BA,
    4. et al
    . Correlating magnetic resonance imaging with the biochemical content of the normal human intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 1992; 10: 552– 61
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Schmidt TA,
    2. An HS,
    3. Lim TH,
    4. et al
    . The stiffness of lumbar spinal motion segments with a high-intensity zone in the anulus fibrosus. Spine 1998; 23: 2167– 73
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Goldie I
    . Granulation tissue in the ruptured intervertebral disc. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1958; 42: 302– 04
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Haughton VM,
    2. Schmidt TA,
    3. Keele K,
    4. et al
    . Flexibility of lumbar spinal motion segments correlated to type of tears in the annulus fibrosus. J Neurosurg 2000; 92( 1 suppl): 81– 86
    PubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 31 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 31, Issue 9
1 Oct 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Don't You Call Me Desiccated, J. Wellington Wimpy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
V. Haughton
Don't You Call Me Desiccated, J. Wellington Wimpy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2010, 31 (9) 1551; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2259

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Don't You Call Me Desiccated, J. Wellington Wimpy
V. Haughton
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2010, 31 (9) 1551; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2259
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Teaching Lessons by MR CLEAN
  • Coffee Houses and Reading Rooms
  • Comeback Victory
Show more EDITORIALS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire